Delhi Court November 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Crowne Plaza Surya Hotel Vs. Peregrine Security P. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-06-2013
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:6. h November, 2013 % + RFA No.77/2005 CROWNE PLAZA SURYA HOTEL ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Ravi Kant Chadha, Sr. Adv. with Mr. R.K. Gautam, Adv. Versus PEREGRINE SECURITY P. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sankalp Goswami with Mr. Azhar Alam and Mr. Akshat Rehmani, Advs. CORAM :HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J1 This appeal impugns the judgment and decree dated 30.10.2004 (of the Court of Additional District Judge in Suit No.045/02/2002 filed by the respondent / plaintiff) of recovery of arrears on account of increase in wages as shown vide statement of account Ex.DW1/PX5 for the period from May, 1999 onwards from the appellant / defendant with interest pendente lite at 8% per annum and costs.2. The appeal was admitted for hearing and vide order dated 22.09.2005, subject to the appellant / defendant depositing the decretal amount in this Court, execution was stayed. Vide subsequent order dated 11.0...
Ram Naresh Vs. Fciand ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-06-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % W.P.(C) No.1516/1999 6th November, 2013 RAM NARESH Through: ......Petitioner Mr. K.C.Mittal and Ms. Anjali Nehra, Advocates. VERSUS FCI& ORS. ...... Respondents Through: CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. For the sake of convenience, the legal heirs of the petitioners are referred to as the petitioners for the purpose of this judgment. Petitioner, by this writ petition impugns the orders passed by the departmental authorities; of the disciplinary authority dated 12.8.1998 and the appellate authority dated 19.12.1998; whereby the petitioner has been imposed the penalty of dismissal from services.2. Petitioner was employed as an Assistant Manager (Quality Control) with Food Corporation of India (FCI)-respondent no.1. Petitioner was issued the charge-sheet dated 16.7.1996 making allegations against him of receiving sub-standard rice, and not giving the necessary qualit...
Mohd. Bashi Vs. State and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-06-2013
* HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + F.A.O. No.141 of 2012 & C.M. No.5828/2012 (for stay) Decided on :6. h November, 2013 MOHD. BASHI Through: Appellant Mr. Ajay Bahl, Advocate. Versus Respondents STATE & ORS. Through: None. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI V.K. SHALI, J.(ORAL) 1. This is an appeal filed by the appellant under Section 299 of the Indian Succession Act against the order dated 8.2.2012 by virtue of which the learned District Judge, North, dismissed the probate petition bearing No.115/2008 filed by the appellant for lack of evidence to have proved the Will dated 24.5.2001 to be last and final Will of the deceased/testatrix Akhtari Begum.2. I have heard the learned counsel for the appellant. The only contention of the learned counsel for the appellant for entertaining this appeal has been that the appellant be given one opportunity to produce the attesting witnesses.3. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that the present appellant filed a petition under Section 2...
Bhawarlal S. Kothari Vs. Registrar, Appellate Tribunal Foreign Exchang ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-06-2013
R-48 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 186/2007 Decided on 06.11.2013 IN THE MATTER OF : BHAWARLAL S. KOTHARI ..... Appellant Through : Mr. P. Ojha, Mr. Alok Singh and Mr. Suresh Kumar, Advocates versus REGISTRAR, APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOREIGN EXCHANGE & ANR. ..... Respondents Through Ms. Rajdipa Behura, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HIMA KOHLI, J.(Oral) 1. The present appeal has been filed by the appellant, a permanent resident of Mumbai, against an order dated 22.3.2006 passed by the Appellate Tribunal for Foreign Exchange (in short the Tribunal) in Appeal No.134/1996, preferred by him against the order dated 27.2.1996 passed by the adjudicatory authority holding inter alia that the appellant had contravened the provisions of Section 8(1) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 (in short the FERA) and imposing a penalty of Rs.87,000/- on him.2. At the outset, learned counsel for the respondents opposes the present appeal on twin grounds of maintain...
Nishan Singh Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-06-2013
$~25 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6602/2013 Date of Decision :06. h November, 2013 % NISHAN SINGH ..... Petitioner Through : Mr. Subhashish Mohanty, Adv. Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS Through : ..... Respondents Mr.Neeraj Chaudhari, CGSC and Mr.Ravjyot Singh, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA GITA MITTAL, J.(Oral) 1. The petitioner seeks in this case restoration of the first financial upgradation as per the Assured Career Progression Scheme (herein after referred to as ACP) w.e.f. 17th June 2003 when he completed 12 years of service with Central Industry Security Force (herein after referred as CISF) and became entitled for grant of first financial upgradation in the grade of Head Constable under the ACP Scheme and grant of second financial upgradation as per MACP Scheme w.e.f 17th June, 2011.2. The undisputed facts in the instant case necessary for adjudication of the writ petition are noticed hereafter. As per the ...
Hira Lal Vs. the State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-06-2013
$~R-6 to 9. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment dated 6th November, 2013 % + CRL.A. 33/2005 GHAN SHYAM Through : ..... Appellant Mr.H.L. Pandey, Adv. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI Through : + ..... Respondent Mr.Firoz Khan Ghazi, Adv. CRL.A. 395/2005 HIRA LAL Through : ..... Appellant Mr.H.L. Pandey, Adv. versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Firoz Khan Ghazi, Adv. + CRL.A. 434/2005 PRAVEEN KUMAR Through : ..... Appellant Mr.H.L. Pandey, Adv. versus STATE Through : + ..... Respondent Mr.Firoz Khan Ghazi, Adv. CRL.A. 516/2005 SHIV KUMAR @ SHIVA Through : ..... Appellant Mr.H.L. Pandey, Adv. versus THE STATE Through : ..... Respondent Mr.Firoz Khan Ghazi, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. The present appeals arise out of a common judgment dated 15.12.2004 and order on conviction dated 16.12.2004 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi, whereby the appellants have been directed to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment ...
Surjit Singh Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-06-2013
$~26 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6603/2013 % Date of Decision :06. h November, 2013 SURJIT SINGH ..... Petitioner Through : Mr. Subhashish Mohanty, Adv. Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents Through : Mr. Saqib, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA GITA MITTAL, J.(Oral) 1. The petitioner seeks in this case restoration of the first financial upgradation as per the Assured Career Progression Scheme (herein after referred to as ACP) w.e.f. 02.07.2004 when he completed 12 years of service with Central Industry Security Force (herein after referred as CISF) and became entitled for grant of first financial upgradation in the grade of Head Constable under the ACP Scheme and grant of second financial upgradation as per MACP Scheme w.e.f. 02nd July 2012.2. The undisputed facts in the instant case necessary for adjudication of the writ petition are noticed hereafter. As per the ACP scheme, in order to be eligible the emplo...
Munnilal Prasad Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-06-2013
$~24 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6600/2013 Date of Decision :06. h November, 2013 % MUNNILAL PRASAD ..... Petitioner Through : Mr. Subhashish Mohanty, Adv. Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ..... Respondent Through : Ms. Barkha Babbar, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA GITA MITTAL, J.(Oral) 1. The petitioner seeks in this case restoration of the first financial upgradation as per the Assured Career Progression Scheme (herein after referred to as ACP) w.e.f. 22nd March 2003 when he completed 12 years of service with Central Industry Security Force (herein after referred as CISF) and became entitled for grant of second financial upgradation as per MACP Scheme w.e.f. 22nd March, 2011.2. The undisputed facts in the instant case giving rise to the writ petition are enumerated that as per the ACP scheme other than completion of 12 years of continuous service in the post of Constable, an employee of the CISF is required to have c...
Ghansham Singh Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-06-2013
$~31 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6722/2013 Date of Decision :06. h November, 2013 % GHANSHAM SINGH ..... Petitioner Through : Mr. Subhashish Mohanty, Adv. Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondent Through : Ms. Barkha Babbar, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA GITA MITTAL, J (Oral) 1. The petitioner seeks in this case restoration of the first financial upgradation as per the Assured Career Progression Scheme (herein after referred to as ACP) w.e.f. 28th February 2004 when he completed 12 years of service with Central Industry Security Force (herein after referred as CISF) and became entitled for grant of second financial upgradation as per MACP Scheme w.e.f. 28th February 2012.2. The undisputed facts in the instant case giving rise to the writ petition are enumerated that as per the ACP scheme other than completion of 12 years of continuous service in the post of Constable, an employee of the CISF is required to hav...
Praveen Kumar Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-06-2013
$~R-6 to 9. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment dated 6th November, 2013 % + CRL.A. 33/2005 GHAN SHYAM Through : ..... Appellant Mr.H.L. Pandey, Adv. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI Through : + ..... Respondent Mr.Firoz Khan Ghazi, Adv. CRL.A. 395/2005 HIRA LAL Through : ..... Appellant Mr.H.L. Pandey, Adv. versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Firoz Khan Ghazi, Adv. + CRL.A. 434/2005 PRAVEEN KUMAR Through : ..... Appellant Mr.H.L. Pandey, Adv. versus STATE Through : + ..... Respondent Mr.Firoz Khan Ghazi, Adv. CRL.A. 516/2005 SHIV KUMAR @ SHIVA Through : ..... Appellant Mr.H.L. Pandey, Adv. versus THE STATE Through : ..... Respondent Mr.Firoz Khan Ghazi, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. The present appeals arise out of a common judgment dated 15.12.2004 and order on conviction dated 16.12.2004 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi, whereby the appellants have been directed to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment ...