Delhi Court November 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Motian Devi Lamba Vs. Chet Ram Gupta (Since Deceased) Through His Lrs ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-06-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:6. h November, 2013 + % # I.A. No.1025/2013 in CS(OS) 2818/1989 SH. CHET RAM GUPTA ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Ashok Gurnani, Advocate VERSUS $ SMT.MOTIAN DEVI LAMBA ..... Defendant Through: Mr. P. Choudhary, Adv. for D-1 Mr. Ashok Bhasin, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Nandini Sahni, Adv. for D-2-4. AND I.A. No.14116/2010 in CS(OS) 2147/2010 # MOTIAN DEVI LAMBA ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. P. Choudhary, Advocate VERSUS $ CHET RAM GUPTA (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH HIS LRs AND OTHERS ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Ashok Gurnani, Adv. for D-1 Mr. Ashok Bhasin, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Nandini Sahni, Adv. for D-2 to 5 * CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K.BHASIN ORDER P.K.BHASIN, J: This common order shall dispose of two separate applications filed by different parties in these two suits for appointment of a Receiver in respect of one property in Greater Kailash-II, New Delhi(to be referred as the suit property hereinafter).2. The facts relevant for ...
Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. Vs. Maj. (Retd) Sukesh Behl and a ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-06-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS (OS) No.2206 of 2012 KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS ELECTRONICS N.V. ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Sudhir Chandra, Senior Advocate with Mr. Pravin Anand, Ms. Vaishali Mittal, Mr. Gupreet Singh Kahlon and Ms. D. Neha Reddy, Advocates. Versus MAJ.(RETD) SUKESH BEHL & ANR ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Ajay Sahni, Mr. N.K. Bhardwaj, Mr. Bikash Ghorai and Ms. Kanika Bajaj, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR ORDER0611.2013 IA No.14921 of 2013 (Order XII Rule 6 CPC) 1. Mr. Sudhir Chandra, learned Senior counsel for the Plaintiff, states that the Plaintiff does not press this application at this point, i.e., IA No.14921 of 2013.2. The application is dismissed as not pressed. IA No.21411 of 2012 (Order XII Rule 6 CPC by Defendant) 3. The background to the present application filed by the Defendant under Order XII Rule 6 CPC is that the above suit has been filed by Plaintiff Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. against Maj. (Retd.) Sukesh Behl, proprietor M/s....
Krishan Kumar BhasIn and ors. Vs. M/S. Pritam Prakash Dawar and Sons ( ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-06-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment pronounced on: November 06, 2013 RC. Rev. No.222/2013 & C.M. No.9850/2013 (for stay) DAVINDER PAL SINGH & ORS ..... Petitioners Through Mr.Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Preet Pal Singh, Ms.Payal Juneja & Ms.Priyam Mehta, Advs. versus M/S PRITAM PRAKASH DAWAR & SONS (HUF) ..... Respondent Through Mr.Gurmeet Singh Narula, Adv. with Mrs.Kiran Bhardwaj, Adv. AND + RC. Rev. No.223/2013 & C.M. No.9853/2013 (for stay) KRISHAN KUMAR BHASIN & ORS ..... Petitioners Through Mr.Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Preet Pal Singh, Ms.Payal Juneja & Ms.Priyam Mehta, Advs. versus M/S PRITAM PRAKASH DAWAR & SONS (HUF) ..... Respondent Through Mr.Gurmeet Singh Narula, Adv. with Mrs.Kiran Bhardwaj, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. Both these revisions petitions have been filed by two set of tenants under Section 25-B of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as the DRC Act) against the order da...
Sonia Gandhi and ors. Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-06-2013
$~R-31A & 31B * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision: November 06, 2013 W.P.(C) 6798/2002 SONIA GANDHI & ORS. Represented by: ..... Petitioners Mr.G.D.Gupta, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Vikram Saini, Advocate versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.S.N.Gupta, Advocate W.P.(C) 8093-8102/2003 LINI JAMES & ORS. Represented by: ..... Petitioners Mr.G.D.Gupta, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Vikram Saini, Advocate versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.V.K.Tandon, Advocate with Mr.Yogesh Saini, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) 1. The record of this court would reveal that in the last 3 years it has decided at least 75 writ petitions concerning employees working under the Government of NCT of Delhi, the erstwhile Municipal Corporation of Delhi and now the three trifurcated Corporations as also the New Delhi Municipal Cou...
theni Kammavar Sangam College of Education Vs. National Council for Te ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-06-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:06. 11.2013 + WP(C) No.6933 of 2013 & CM No.15023 of 2013 THENI KAMMAVAR SANGAM COLLEGE OF EDUCATION ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. M.A. Chinasamy, Adv. versus NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION & ANR. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Chandra Shekhar for Mr. Amitesh Kumar, Adv. for NCTE CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(Oral) The petitioner before this Court applied to Southern Regional Committee (SRC) of NCTE, seeking recognition/ permission to conduct B.Ed. Course for 100 (one hundred) additional intake. The aforesaid application was submitted online on 31.12.2012. In terms of the rules of National Council for Teacher Education (NCTE), hard copy in triplicate of the online application was required to be dispatched within seven (7) days of the submission of online application and in the event of failure of the applicant to do so, the application was liable to be rejected. The case of the petitioner is...
National Investor Forum Regd. Vs. Golden Forests India Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-06-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:06. 11.2013 + W.P.(C) 1399/2010, C.M. APPL. 3279/2013, 3988/2013 & 5733/2013 NATIONAL INVESTOR FORUM REGD. ..... Petitioner versus GOLDEN FORESTS INDIA LTD. + W.P.(C) 1400/2010 NATIONAL INVESTORS FORUM ..... Respondents ..... Petitioner versus GOLDEN FORESTS INDIA LTD. ..... Respondents Through: Sh. Akshat Goel, Advocate, for Resp. No.1 in C.M. No.3279/2013 in W.P.(C) 1399/2010. Sh. Harpawan Kumar Arora, Advocate, for the Committee. Sh. Ajay Pal and Sh. Vishal Yadav, Advocates, for Resp. Nos. 1, 2 and 4. Sh. Rajeev Sharma, Sh. Sahil Bhalaik and Sh. Uddyam Mukherjee, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) % C.M. APPL. 5733/2013 1. This application has been filed by the Court-appointed W.P.(C) 1399/2010 & 1400/2010 Page 1 Committee in respect of Golden Forests (India) Limited. The Committee seeks confirmation of an order dated 17.04.2013 in respe...
Piyush Rastogi Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-06-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment pronounced on:06. 11.2013 CRIMINAL APPEAL No.436/2009 PIYUSH RASTOGI ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Rajesh Anand, Advocate with Mr. Akhand Pratap Singh, Advocate versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Mukesh Gupta, APP with Inspector Anand Lakra and Inspector Bhagwan Singh, PS Shastri Park Metro CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J.1. The present appeal is directed against the judgment dated 12.05.2009 whereby the Appellant has been convicted in Sessions Case No.80/09 under Sections 489C and 489D of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) for possessing and indulging in manufacture of counterfeit currency. By order of sentence dated 15.05.2009, for offence under Section 489C of IPC, the appellant is sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for seven years and a fine of Rs 1 lakh has also been imposed; in default of payment fine, the appellant is to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of six months. ...
Shail Sahni Vs. Valsa Sara Mathew and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-06-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:06. 11.2013 W.P.(C) 6944/2013 SHAIL SAHNI Through: ..... Petitioner Petitioner in person versus VALSA SARA MATHEW AND ORS ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sunil Satyarth, Adv. for R-1 to 3 JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(ORAL) The petitioner before this Court submitted an application to the CPIO of Delhi Cantonment Board on 25.11.2011 seeking certain information. According to the petitioner, no reply to the said application was received by him within the prescribed period and, therefore, he preferred an appeal before the First Appellate Authority on 26.12.2011. The grievance of the petitioner is that the aforesaid appeal is still pending with the First Appellate Authority, since 26.12.2011. The petitioner submitted yet another application to the CPIO, Delhi Cantonment Board on 5.1.2012, seeking information. Vide letter dated 7.2.2012, the petitioner was asked to collect the aforesaid information on payment of Rs.846/-. According to the ...
Davinder Pal Singh and ors. Vs. M/S Pritam Prakash Dawar and Sons (Huf ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-06-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment pronounced on: November 06, 2013 RC. Rev. No.222/2013 & C.M. No.9850/2013 (for stay) DAVINDER PAL SINGH & ORS ..... Petitioners Through Mr.Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Preet Pal Singh, Ms.Payal Juneja & Ms.Priyam Mehta, Advs. versus M/S PRITAM PRAKASH DAWAR & SONS (HUF) ..... Respondent Through Mr.Gurmeet Singh Narula, Adv. with Mrs.Kiran Bhardwaj, Adv. AND + RC. Rev. No.223/2013 & C.M. No.9853/2013 (for stay) KRISHAN KUMAR BHASIN & ORS ..... Petitioners Through Mr.Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Preet Pal Singh, Ms.Payal Juneja & Ms.Priyam Mehta, Advs. versus M/S PRITAM PRAKASH DAWAR & SONS (HUF) ..... Respondent Through Mr.Gurmeet Singh Narula, Adv. with Mrs.Kiran Bhardwaj, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. Both these revisions petitions have been filed by two set of tenants under Section 25-B of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as the DRC Act) against the order da...
Ravi Kumar @ Ranga Vs. State (Nct) of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-06-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of decision:06.11.2013 CRL.A. 296/2010 RAVI KUMAR @ RANGA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sunil Kumar, Adv. versus STATE (NCT) OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. O.P. Saxena, APP for State with SI Harish Chandra, P.S. Karol Bagh. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL JUDGMENT VEENA BIRBAL, J.(Oral) 1. This criminal appeal is directed against the judgment dated 5.10.2009 whereby the appellant has been held guilty for having committed the offence punishable under Section 304 Part I of IPC and the order of sentence dated 6.10.2009 whereby the appellant has been sentenced to undergo R.I. for 10 years and to pay fine of Rs.5000/- in default of payment of fine to undergo S.I. for 3 months. The benefit under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been given to him.2. The case of the prosecution is that on 9.3.2006 DD No.5A i.e. Ex.PW8/A was got recorded in P.S. Karol Bagh on the information given by Jagdish, PW2 that his brother Surender was lying dead a...
- ‹ Prev
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 48
- 50
- 51
- 52
- 53
- 54
- Next ›
- Last »