Delhi Court November 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Manjeet Kaur and ors. Vs. Sukhdev Singh and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-08-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS (OS) No.1228 of 2008 Reserved on: October 24, 2013 Decision on: November 8, 2013 CS (OS) 1228 of 2008 & IA Nos. 7555 of 2008, 2376 of 2009 MANJEET KAUR & ORS. ..... Plaintiffs Through: Ms. Richa Kapoor & Ms. Karuna Chatwal, Advocates. versus SUKHDEV SINGH & ANR. ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Gaurav Sarin, Ms. Charul Sareen & Ms. Veera Angrish, Advocates for Defendant No.2. WITH CS (OS) 1230 of 2008 & IA Nos. 7557 of 2008, 2378 of 2009, 9886 of 2010 MANJEET KAUR & ORS. ..... Plaintiffs Through: Ms. Richa Kapoor & Ms. Karuna Chatwal, Advocates. Versus MANJIT SINGH & ANR. ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Gaurav Sarin, Ms. Charul Sareen & Ms. Veera Angrish, Advocates for Defendant No.2. WITH CS (OS) 1420 of 2008 & IA Nos. 8730 of 2008, 2377 of 2009, 9893 of 2010 MANJEET KAUR & ORS ..... Plaintiffs Through: Ms. Richa Kapoor & Ms. Karuna Chatwal, Advocates. versus SUKHDEV SINGH & ANR. ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Gaurav Sarin, Ms. Charul Sareen & Ms. ...
Pramod @ Pammi Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-08-2013
$~ 30 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Crl.A.No.1293/2012 & Crl.M.B.1992/2012 % Judgment dated 08 November, 2013 PRAMOD @ PAMMI Through: ..... Appellant Mr.A.J.Bhambhani and Mr.Apurv Chandola, Advocates versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Mr.Mahipal Malik, Adv. for State Appellant was produced in custody. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. Present appeal is directed against the impugned judgment dated 19.11.2011 and order on sentence dated 23.11.2011, by which the appellant has been sentenced to undergo SI for 5 years and to pay a fine of Rs.5000/-, in default of payment of fine appellant was to further undergo imprisonment for 6 months under section 307 IPC.2. It may be clarified that the order placed on record along with the appeal is dated 22.11.2011, but a corrigendum was issued on 23.11.2011, which reads as under:Corrigendum to ORDER ON SENTENCE2311.2011 Paragraph 4 of order on sentence dated 22.11.2011, Instead of Keeping in view the sub...
Kundan Lal Vs. Indian Red Cross Society and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-08-2013
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on October 09, 2013 Judgment Delivered on November 08, 2013 + LPA7062005 KUNDAN LAL ..... Appellant Represented by: Appellant in person versus INDIAN RED CROSS SOCIETY & ANR. ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.L.R.Khatana, Advocate with Mr.Sudhir Naagar and Mr.Rajesh Rexwal, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO V.KAMESWAR RAO, J.1. The instant appeal impugns the judgment and order dated March 16, 2005 passed by a learned Single Judge dismissing W.P.(C) No.7761/2003 filed by the appellant and as a result order dated June 24, 2002 transferring appellant as also the subsequent order dated September 03, 2002 passed by the Competent Authority of the first respondent terminating services of the appellant were upheld.2. Disciplinary proceedings of the employees of the first respondent are admittedly governed by CCS (CCA) Rules, 1965, being adopted by a resolution in the year 1980,...
M. R. A. Associates India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Seven Seas Hospitality Pvt. Lt ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-08-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:1. t November, 2013 Date of decision:8. h November, 2013 % + CO. PET. No.478/2011 M. R. A. ASSOCIATES INDIA PVT. LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Subhiksh Vasudev and Mr. Srivats Kaushal, Advocates. versus SEVEN SEAS HOSPITALITY PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. S. C. Singhal, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.V.EASWAR JUDGMENT R. V. EASWAR, J.:1. This is a petition filed under Section 433 (e) of the Companies Act, 1956 seeking winding-up of the respondent-company for non-payment of the dues of `21,20,232/-.2. The petitioner is a company engaged in rendering integrated services relating to infrastructure development. The respondent-company had planned to build a five star Hotel in Rohini, Delhi and sought the assistance of the petitioner to provide management services for the project. On 17.12.2010 a techno-commercial proposal was submitted by the petitioner which explained the scope of construction management services a...
Samsung India Electronics Pvt Ltd. Vs. Dy. Commissioner of Income-tax, ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-08-2013
$~4. *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WRIT PETITON (CIVIL) NO.2892/2013 Date of decision:8. h November, 2013 SAMSUNG INDIA ELECTRONICS PVT LTD. ..... Petitioner Through Mr. S.C. Dastur, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Satyen Sethi, Mr. Madhu Agarwal & Mr. Arta Trana Panda, Advocates. versus DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE-7 (I) & ORS. ..... Respondents Through Mr. Amol Sinha, Sr. Standing Counsel & Mr. Rahul Kochar, Advocate for respondent Nos. 1 to 3. Mr. Aditya Malhotra, Advocate for respondent No.4-UOI. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL): The present writ petition impugns re-assessment notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act, for short) dated 30th March, 2013 relating to Assessment Year 2006-07. The petitioner after receipt of the said notice filed the present writ petition on 2 nd May, 2013. Reasons to believe were supplied on 8th April, 2013 and have been enclosed as Annexure P-16 to the pr...
Jamuna Prasad Vs. State and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-08-2013
$~ 3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 1006/2012 & CRL.M.A. 5142/2013 % Judgment dated 08 November, 2013 JAMUNA PRASAD Through: ..... Petitioner Mr.P.S. Dahiya, Advocate versus STATE & ORS Through: ..... Respondent Mr.Rajesh Mahajan and Ms.Urvi K. Malik, Advocates for the State Mr.Sunil K. Mittal and Mr.Rajesh Kaushik, Advocates for the respondents No.6 Mr.Zubair Raza and Mr.Sameer Chandra, Advocates for respondent no.7 Mr.Narender Mann, Spl.P.P. for CBI with Mr.Manoj Pant, Advocate for the CBI S.I. Shivdarshan, Crime Branch. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. With the consent of counsel for the parties, the present petition is set down for final hearing and disposal.2. The facts of the case as stated by the petitioner in this petition are that on 7.12.2011 respondent no.7 along with 7 - 8 persons knocked the door of the petitioner at approximately 11:15 at night. The petitioner found 7 - 8 unknown persons standing with weapons along wit...
Satish Kumar Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-08-2013
$~11 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6275/2012 and CM Nos.822/2013 and 16788/2012 Date of decision:8. h November, 2013 % SATISH KUMAR Through : ..... Petitioner Mr.N.L.Bareja, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS Through : ..... Respondents Mr.Sunil Kumar and Mr.T.P.Singh, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA GITA MITTAL, J.(Oral) 1. By way of the instant writ petition the petitioner has assailed the order dated 26th September, 2011 and whereby the respondents have held that the petitioner was not suitable for recruitment in the Central Industrial Security Force on account of his implication in a criminal prosecution. The petitioner also assails the order dated 6th January, 2012 passed by the respondents to the legal notice served by the petitioner challenging the above decision.2. The case of the petitioner is that pursuant to the advertisement issued in September, 2010, he had applied for the direct recruitment to the post ...
Abid Akhtar Vs. Jamia Millia Islamia and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-08-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % W.P.(C) No.6347/1999 8th November, 2013 ABID AKHTAR Through: ......Petitioner Mr. Pradeep Gupta and Mr. Vishal Gupta, Advocates. VERSUS JAMIA MILLIA ISLAMIA & ORS. ...... Respondents Through: Mr. Rohit Gandhi, Ms. Jaya Goyal and Ms. Manpreet Kaur, Advocates. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this writ petition, petitioner impugns the order dated 5.10.1999 whereby the petitioner has been imposed a major penalty of compulsory retirement.2. In this case I may note that petitioner did not appear in the proceedings before the enquiry officer. Several adjournments were granted and several notices were issued to the petitioner but to no avail. Even after petitioner stopped appearing, proceedings sheet as also the evidence recorded was sent to him. Even the summary of arguments on behalf of the Presenting Officer of the department was sent to the petitioner. Petitioner ...
Ashok Kumar Vs. Pushpa Rani Deceased Through Lrs.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-08-2013
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RSA No.51/2011 & CM No.19889/2012 Decided on :8. h November, 2013 Appellant ASHOK KUMAR Through: Mr.Ashok Kumar and Mr.R.M.Tatia, Advocates. Versus PUSHPA RANI DECEASED THROUGH LRS. Respondents Through: Mr.Naveen Kumar Goyal, Advocate for LRs of R-2 to R-4. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI V.K. SHALI, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a regular second appeal filed by the appellant against the judgment and decree dated 10.09.2010 passed by Sh.Suresh Kumar Gupta, ADJ in RCA No.76/2009 dismissing the first appeal of the appellant.2. I have heard the learned counsel for the appellant.3. The contention of the learned counsel for the appellant is that he had filed a suit for declaration to the effect that the sale deed dated 14.06.1989 purported to have been executed by him in favour of his mother is a fabricated document and the same is an outcome of fraud and therefore should be declared as null and void. It has been stated by the learned counsel for the appellan...
Prithvi Singh Vs. Uoi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-08-2013
$~S-2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % DECIDED ON:08. 11.2013 + W.P. (C) 7313/2000 PRITHVI SINGH ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen with Mr. G.P. Singh, Advocates. Versus UOI & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Meera Bhatia, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA MR. JUSTICE S.RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) % 1. The present proceeding challenges an order dated 24.10.1997 compulsorily retiring the petitioner, who was at the relevant time Head Constable in the CISF, posted at Madras Port Trust, Chennai.2. The brief facts are that the petitioner had joined the services of the CISF on 20.11.1971. At the relevant time, when he was working at Madras Port Trust, Chennai as a Head Constable, on account of incident involving scuffle between him and Constable S. Pandi with respect to some difference of opinion about the distribution of duties, the petitioner was issued with a chargesheet on 06.12.1996. Three W.P.(C)73...
- ‹ Prev
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 48
- 49
- Next ›
- Last »