Delhi Court November 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Epsilon Projects Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Ministry of Environment and Forests and ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-07-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on:22. 10.2013 Date of Decision:07. 11.2013 WP(C) No.3141 of 2012 CM No.6753 of 2012 (Stay) MAHENDRA PANDEY & ANR. ....Petitioners Through: Ms. Ruchi Kohli, Ms. Vidushi & Mr. Yash Mishra, Advs. Versus SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT & FORESTS AND ORS. ....Respondents Through: Mr. Rajeeve Mehra, ASG with Mr. Sachin Datta, CGSC & Mr. Vineet, Adv. for the UOI. Mr. Sandeeep Prabhakar, Mr. Amit Kumar & Mr. Pratap Behra, Advs. for R-3, 4 & 5. + WP(C) No.7034 of 2012 RANI GUPTA Through: ....Petitioner Ms. Ruchi Kohli, Ms. Vidushi & Mr. Yash Mishra, Advs. Versus SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT & FORESTS AND ORS. ....Respondents Through: Mr. Rajeeve Mehra, ASG with Mr. Sachin Datta, CGSC & Mr. Vineet, Adv. for the UOI. Mr. Sandeeep Prabhakar, Mr. Amit Kumar & Mr. Pratap Behra, Advs. for R-3, 4 & 5. + WP(C) No.103 of 2013 MIN MEC CONSULTANCY PVT. LTD. ....Petitioner Through: Ms. Ruchi Kohli, Ms. Vidushi & Mr. Yash Mishra, Advs...
Amira Foods (India) Ltd. Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-07-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:07. 11.2013 + WP(C) No.773 of 2011 SHRI LAL MAHAL LIMITED ..... Petitioner Through: Mr Akhil Sibal, Ms Ruchi Agnihotri and Mr Narendra M. Sharma and MrVishrut Raj, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr Rajeeve Mehra, ASG with Mr Sachin Datta, CGSC, Mr Dinesh Sharma, Mr Kartikey and Ms Shruti Aggarwal and Ms Mala, Advs. + WP(C) No.2858 of 2011 EMMSONS INTERNATIONAL LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr Akhil Sibal, Ms Ruchi Agnihotri and Mr Pradeep and Mr Rohan, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr Rajeeve Mehra, ASG with Mr Sachin Datta, CGSC, Mr Dinesh Sharma, Mr Kartikey and Ms Shruti Aggarwal and Ms Mala, Advs. + WP(C) No.3132 of 2011 AMIRA FOODS (INDIA) LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr Akhil Sibal, Ms Ruchi Agnihotri and Mr Pradeep and Mr Rohan, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr Rajeeve Mehra, ASG with Mr Sachin Datta, CGSC, Mr Dinesh Sh...
Khawar Butt Vs. Asif Nazir Mir and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-07-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order reserved on:08. 07.2013 % + Order delivered on:07. 11.2013 CS(OS) 290/2010 KHAWAR BUTT ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Manish Kaushik, Advocate with Mr. Vivek Singh, Advocate versus ASIF NAZIR MIR & ORS ..... Defendant Through: Ms. Manmeet Arora, Ms. Mansi Sharma and Ms. Nidhi Parashar, Advocates CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI ORDER VIPIN SANGHI, J.I.A. No.13629/2011 (U/O7rule 11(a) read with Section 151 CPC by the defendant) I.A. No.13630/2011 (U/O6Rule 16 read with Section 151 CPC by the defendant) I.A. No.14479/2011(U/O7Rule 11 and Section 151 CPC by the defendant) I.A. No.8404/2013(U/O6Rule 17 CPC read with Section 151 CPC for amendment of plaint by the plaintiff) 1. By this common order, I proceed to dispose of the aforesaid four applications.2. The plaintiff has preferred the present suit to claim damages of Rs. 1 crore and for mandatory injunction. Initially, there were two defendants in the suit defendant No.1 being Asif Naz...
M/S Bumbrah Electric Co. Vs. Delhi Development Authority and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-07-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:23. 10.2013 Judgment delivered on:07. 11.2013 % + CS(OS) No.1152A/2009 M/S BUMBRAH ELECTRIC CO. ..... Plaintiff Versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR. ..... Defendants Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Plaintiff: Mr Vivekanand, Advocate. For the Defendants: Mr Sangram Patnaik & Mr Umesh Yadav, Advocates for defendant No.1 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER,J CS(OS) No.1152A/2009 & IA No.15274/2009 (Objections by DDA) 1. In the captioned suit relief is sought by the plaintiff in terms of Sections 14 & 17 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 (in short the Act). It is briefly prayed that a direction be issued to defendant no.2, who is the arbitrator appointed in the matter, to file the original award dated 15.05.2009, along with the record, in this court, and to thereafter, make the said award a rule of the court. A decree is thus sought in terms of the award. Interest at the rate of 12% per annum i...
M/S Mesco Pharmaceuticals Ltd. and ors Vs. R.K.Rawal and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-07-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: October 23, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on: November07, 2013 + CRL.M.C. No.5063/2006 M/S. MESCO PHARMACEUTICALS LTD. ORS. ...Petitioner Through: Mr. R.K.Handoo and Mr. Yogesh Sharma, Advocates Versus R.K. RAWAL & ORS. Through: .....Respondents Mr. Sachin Datta, Central Government Standing Counsel CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR % 1. JUDGMENT In a complaint (Annexure P-1) under Section 56 of The Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as FERA) read with Sub-section (3) & (4) of Section 49 of The Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999, petitioner-company and its four Directors have been summoned as accused by trial court vide order of 28 th May, 2012 (Annexure P-2).2. In this petition, quashing of aforesaid criminal complaint (Annexure P-1), impugned order (Annexure P-2) and Opportunity Notice of 13th March, 2002 is sought on merits.3. At the hearing, learned counsel for petitioners had placed relian...
Dr. Yash Paul Sharma Vs. Ministry of Environment and Forests and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-07-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on:22. 10.2013 Date of Decision:07. 11.2013 WP(C) No.3141 of 2012 CM No.6753 of 2012 (Stay) MAHENDRA PANDEY & ANR. ....Petitioners Through: Ms. Ruchi Kohli, Ms. Vidushi & Mr. Yash Mishra, Advs. Versus SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT & FORESTS AND ORS. ....Respondents Through: Mr. Rajeeve Mehra, ASG with Mr. Sachin Datta, CGSC & Mr. Vineet, Adv. for the UOI. Mr. Sandeeep Prabhakar, Mr. Amit Kumar & Mr. Pratap Behra, Advs. for R-3, 4 & 5. + WP(C) No.7034 of 2012 RANI GUPTA Through: ....Petitioner Ms. Ruchi Kohli, Ms. Vidushi & Mr. Yash Mishra, Advs. Versus SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT & FORESTS AND ORS. ....Respondents Through: Mr. Rajeeve Mehra, ASG with Mr. Sachin Datta, CGSC & Mr. Vineet, Adv. for the UOI. Mr. Sandeeep Prabhakar, Mr. Amit Kumar & Mr. Pratap Behra, Advs. for R-3, 4 & 5. + WP(C) No.103 of 2013 MIN MEC CONSULTANCY PVT. LTD. ....Petitioner Through: Ms. Ruchi Kohli, Ms. Vidushi & Mr. Yash Mishra, Advs...
Anchor Health and Beauty Care Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Shivam Hygienes India Pvt. ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-07-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:11. 10.2013 % Judgment delivered on:07. 11.2013 + CS(OS) 2290/2006 and I.A. No.13796/2006 ANCHOR HEALTH & BEAUTY CARE PVT.LTD...... Plaintiffs Through: Ms. Suhasini Raina & Mr. Ashutosh Kumar, Advocates. versus SHIVAM HYGIENES INDIA PVT. LTD. ..... Defendant Through: CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI JUDGMENT VIPIN SANGHI, J.1. The plaintiff has filed the present suit alleging infringement of its trademark ANCHOR by the defendant and, conse quently, seeking a decree of permanent injunction to restrain the defendant, it principal officers, family members, stockists, servants, agents and anyone acting for and on its behalf from using the said mark, or the device, or any other mark or device that is identical or deceptively similar, or is a colorable imitation of the plaintiffs mark and device for a range of products such as Tea, Amla, Gulab Jal, Coffee, salt, etc., which may result in infringement of copyright and the re...
Nct of Delhi Thr.Deputy Secretary (Home) Vs. Jagvesh Kumar Sharma and ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-07-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:07. 11.2013 + WP(C) No.7837 of 2009 CM No.4134 of 2009 (Stay) NCT OF DELHI THR. DEPUTY SECRETARY (HOME) ....Petitioner Through: Mr. Anjum Javed, Adv. with Ms. Indu Sinha, Deputy Secretary (HQ), Mr. Rakesh, Gr.-II & Mr. Anil, Gr.-III in person. Versus JAGVESH KUMAR SHARMA & ANR. ....Respondents Through: Mr. Archit Upadhayay, Adv. With Respondent No.1 in person. + WP(C) No.9385 of 2009 CM No.7208 of 2009 (Stay) NCT OF DELHI THR. DEPUTY SECRETARY (HOME) ....Petitioner Through: Mr. Anjum Javed, Adv. with Ms. Indu Sinha, Deputy Secretary (HQ), Mr. Rakesh, Gr.-II & Mr. Anil, Gr.-III in person. Versus JAGVESH KUMAR SHARMA & ANR. ....Respondents Through: Mr. Archit Upadhayay, Adv. With Respondent No.1 in person. + WP(C) No.8267 of 2009 CM No.5080 of 2009 (Stay) NCT OF DELHI THR. DEPUTY SECRETARY (HOME) ....Petitioner Through: Mr. Anjum Javed, Adv. with Ms. Indu Sinha, Deputy Secretary (HQ), Mr. Rakesh, Gr.-II & Mr. Anil, Gr.-III in p...
Microsoft Corporation and anr. Vs. Vishal Mehta and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-07-2013
$~ * 29 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(OS) 1107 of 2013 MICROSOFT CORPORATION & ANR. ..... Plaintiffs Through: Ms. Shilpa Gupta, Advocate versus VISHAL MEHTA & ORS. Through: ..... Defendants Ms. Swathi Sukumar, Advocate CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR % ORDER0711.2013 1.On 29th May 2013, while directing issuance of summons in the suit and granting an interim order restraining the Defendants from using any unlicensed software programmes of Plaintiff No.1 company, the Court also appointed Local Commissioners (LCs) to visit the premises of the Defendant No.2, NSI Infinium Global Pvt. Ltd. (NIGPL) in three different locations to carry out the directions prayed for in IA No.9363 of 2013 under Order XXVI Rule 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC).2. Mr. Gyan Chand, a Protocol Assistant of this Court, was appointed as LC to visit the premises of NIGPL at Ahmedabad, Mr. Abin Mathew, Advocate, to visit the premises at Mahipalpur, New Delhi and Ms. Tina Gupta, Advocate to visit...
Ritnand Balved Education Foundation Vs. Paul Nanda and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-07-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: October 10, 2013 Decision on: November 7, 2013 CS (OS) 247 of 2004 RITNAND BALVED EDUCATION FOUNDATION..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Rajesh Yadav, Mr. Rajan Chawla & Ms. Ruchira V. Arora, Advocates versus PAUL NANDA & ORS. Through: ..... Defendants Mr. T.K. Ganju, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vikas Dhawan & Mr. S.P. Das, Advocates WITH CS (OS) 1318 of 2004 & IA Nos. 11036 of 2007, 15251 of 2009, 2071 of 2011, 5356 of 2012 PAUL NANDA & ORS. Through: ..... Plaintiff Mr. T.K. Ganju, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vikas Dhawan & Mr. S.P. Das, Advocates versus RITNAND BALVED EDUCATION FOUNDATION...... Defendant Through: Mr. Rajesh Yadav, Mr. Rajan Chawla & Ms. Ruchira V. Arora, Advocates CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUDGMENT0711.2013 1. Both these suits arise out a common set of facts. They have been tried together. CS (OS) No.247 of 2004 has been filed by Ritnand Balved Education Foundation (RBEF) against late Admiral S.M. Nanda for a permanent inju...
- ‹ Prev
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 50
- 51
- Next ›
- Last »