Delhi Court November 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Hemant Satti Vs. Mohan Satti and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-07-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(OS) 824 of 2010 & IA Nos. 5600 of 2010 (u/O39R1& @ CPC), 8351, 8352 of 2010 (u/S16r/w O VII R11CPC), 13922 of 2012 (u/O XII R6CPC), 16912 of 2012 (u/O VI R17CPC) HEMANT SATTI ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Gaurav Mitra with Mr. Vijayender Kumar, Ms. Samreen and Ms. Megha Bansiwal, Advocates. versus MOHAN SATTI & ORS. ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Rahul Sharma, Advocate for D-1. Ms. Jyoti D. Sharma, Advocate for D-2. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR ORDER0711.2013 I.A. No.8351 and 8352 of 2010 (u/S16r/w O VII R. 11 CPC) 1. The background to these applications is that the aforementioned suit has been filed by Mr. Hemant Satti against his brother, Mr. Mohan Satti (Defendant No.1), his mother Mrs. Chander Kanta Satti (Defendant No.2), his sister Mrs. Rachana Mundepi (D-3) and his other sister Mrs. Madhu Preet Kaur (D-4) for partition and permanent injunction.2. The case of the Plaintiff is that late Mr. Tek Chand Satti, the father of the Plaintiff and D...
Sandesh Verma Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-07-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.4597/2012 7th November, 2013 % SANDESH VERMA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Deepak, Advocate with petitioner in person. Versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. Respondents Through: Mr. Sachin Chopra, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. R.K. Vats, Advocate for respondent No.2. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. Counter affidavit in this case has been filed way back in August, 2013. There is no reason to grant adjournment to file rejoinder affidavit as the facts of the present case show that the petition is clearly barred by the principle of estoppel as also the direct ratio of the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of A.K.Bindal Vs. Union of India (2003) 5 SCC163 2. Petitioner was an employee of respondent No.2. Petitioner took voluntary retirement under a 2009 SVRS Scheme. Petitioner received amounts pursuant to acceptance of his VRS application. Petition...
Lt. Col. (Retd.) Mr. S.S. Dubey Vs. the Director of Education and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-07-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.110/2008 7th November, 2013 % LT. COL. (RETD.) MR. S.S. DUBEY ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. H.K. Chaturvedi, Advocate. Versus THE DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION AND ORS. Respondents Through: Ms. Sana Ansari, Advocate for respondent No.1. Ms. Parul Babbar, Advocate for respondent Nos.2 and 3. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. Yes VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. The petitioner by means of this writ petition seeks the relief of payment of both the service gratuity and the retirement gratuity as provided in Rules 49 and 50 of the CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972. Petitioner claims that both the amounts in terms of Rules 49 and 50 are payable (and not only one of the amounts of retirement gratuity) in spite of the fact that petitioner is getting pension for his earlier services rendered in the military/Army prior to his being employed by the respondent no.3/Army Public School. Rules 49 and 50 of the CCS Pens...
M/S. Miracle Infoweb Pvt. Ltd. Through Its Directo Vs. State and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-07-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 4529/2013 & Crl. M.A.16213/2013 Date of decision :7. h November, 2013 % M/S. MIRACLE INFOWEB PVT. LTD. THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR SH. SUMAN BHATTACHARYA ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Malya Chand, Adv. versus STATE & ANR. Through ..... Respondents Mr. Parveen Bhati, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The petitioner has challenged the order dated 10th January, 2013 whereby the learned Metropolitan Magistrate dismissed the petitioners application challenging the territorial jurisdiction of the Court.2. The brief relevant facts relating to this case are as under:- (i) The petitioner approached respondent no.2 to broadcast its advertisements on the FM channel Fever 104 FM in pursuance to which respondent no.2 broadcasted the advertisements and raised the bills. (ii) The respondent issued a cheque bearing no.050221 dated 15th July, 2010 for Rs.19,14,243.80 drawn on Federal Bank Limited, Kolkata to respondent no.2 in dis...
Uoi Thru Directorate of Enforcement Vs. Amway India Enterprises and or ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-07-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 392/2007 Decided on 07.11.2013 IN THE MATTER OF : UOI THRU DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT .... Appellant Through: Ms. Rajdipa Behura, Advocate versus AMWAY INDIA ENTERPRISES & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Anil K. Kher, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Rishi Manchanda, Advocate for respondents No.1 to 3 Mr.Kartik Bajpai, Advocate for respondent No.4 CORAM HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HIMA KOHLI, J.(Oral) 1. The present appeal arises out of the common order dated 28.2.2007 passed by the Appellate Tribunal for Foreign Exchange (hereinafter referred to as `the Tribunal) allowing Appeals No.262, 263, 264 & 301/2005 filed by the respondents No.1, 2, 3 & 4 respectively, assailing a common adjudication order dated 7.2.2005 passed by the Adjudicatory Authority imposing penalties against them for contravention of Section 29(1)(a) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973(hereinafter referred to as `FERA).2. Vide order dated 7.2.2005, the Adjudicatory ...
Mohinder Kumar Khandelwal Vs. Gulshan Kumar Anand
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-06-2013
.* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment pronounced on: November 06, 2013 RC. Rev. No.256/2012 & C.M. No.10561/2012 (for stay) MOHINDER KUMAR KHANDELWAL Through Mr.S.R. Mehta, Adv. ..... Petitioner versus GULSHAN KUMAR ANAND ..... Respondent Through Mr.J.S. Bakshi, Adv. with Mr.A.S. Bakshi, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. The petitioner/tenant, Mohinder Kumar Khandelwal has filed the present revision petition under Section 25(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as the DRC Act) against the order dated 13th January, 2012 whereby his application for leave to defend was dismissed in the eviction petition bearing No.E-451/09 filed by the respondent/landlord under Section 14(1)(e) of the DRC Act.2. Brief facts, as recorded in the eviction petition, are that the respondent is the owner of the property bearing No.39-40/2988, Beadon Pura, Karol Bagh, New Delhi. He is Senior Citizen aged about 71 years. The petitioner...
National Investors Forum Vs. Golden Forests India Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-06-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:06. 11.2013 + W.P.(C) 1399/2010, C.M. APPL. 3279/2013, 3988/2013 & 5733/2013 NATIONAL INVESTOR FORUM REGD. ..... Petitioner versus GOLDEN FORESTS INDIA LTD. + W.P.(C) 1400/2010 NATIONAL INVESTORS FORUM ..... Respondents ..... Petitioner versus GOLDEN FORESTS INDIA LTD. ..... Respondents Through: Sh. Akshat Goel, Advocate, for Resp. No.1 in C.M. No.3279/2013 in W.P.(C) 1399/2010. Sh. Harpawan Kumar Arora, Advocate, for the Committee. Sh. Ajay Pal and Sh. Vishal Yadav, Advocates, for Resp. Nos. 1, 2 and 4. Sh. Rajeev Sharma, Sh. Sahil Bhalaik and Sh. Uddyam Mukherjee, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) % C.M. APPL. 5733/2013 1. This application has been filed by the Court-appointed W.P.(C) 1399/2010 & 1400/2010 Page 1 Committee in respect of Golden Forests (India) Limited. The Committee seeks confirmation of an order dated 17.04.2013 in respe...
Sh. Chet Ram Gupta Vs. Smt. Motian Devi Lamba
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-06-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:6. h November, 2013 + % # I.A. No.1025/2013 in CS(OS) 2818/1989 SH. CHET RAM GUPTA ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Ashok Gurnani, Advocate VERSUS $ SMT.MOTIAN DEVI LAMBA ..... Defendant Through: Mr. P. Choudhary, Adv. for D-1 Mr. Ashok Bhasin, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Nandini Sahni, Adv. for D-2-4. AND I.A. No.14116/2010 in CS(OS) 2147/2010 # MOTIAN DEVI LAMBA ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. P. Choudhary, Advocate VERSUS $ CHET RAM GUPTA (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH HIS LRs AND OTHERS ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Ashok Gurnani, Adv. for D-1 Mr. Ashok Bhasin, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Nandini Sahni, Adv. for D-2 to 5 * CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K.BHASIN ORDER P.K.BHASIN, J: This common order shall dispose of two separate applications filed by different parties in these two suits for appointment of a Receiver in respect of one property in Greater Kailash-II, New Delhi(to be referred as the suit property hereinafter).2. The facts relevant for ...
Om Parkash Vs. State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-06-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :29. h August, 2013 DECIDED ON :6. h November, 2013 + CRL.A.765/2001 OM PARKASH Through : ..... Appellant Mr.K.B.Andley, Sr.Advocate with Mohd. Shamik, Advocate. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI Through : + ..... Respondent Mr.Navin Kr.Jha, APP. CRL.A.742/2001 YOGENDRA SINGH BHARTWAL Through : ..... Appellant Pramod Kumar Dubey with Mr.Shiv Chopra, Mr.Nitin Saluja and Mr.Saurav Upadhyay, Advocates. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI Through : ..... Respondent Mr.Navin Kr.Jha, APP. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. Om Parkash (A-1) and Yogendra Singh Bhartwal (A-2) challenge correctness and legality of a judgment dated 29.09.2001 in CC No.10/93 arising out of FIR No.5/88 registered at Police Station AntiCorruption Branch (ACB) of Delhi by which they were held guilty for committing offences punishable under Section 161 IPC read with Section 5 (1) (d) of POC Act and sentenced to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for one year with fine `100 on eac...
Lini James and ors. Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-06-2013
$~R-31A & 31B * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision: November 06, 2013 W.P.(C) 6798/2002 SONIA GANDHI & ORS. Represented by: ..... Petitioners Mr.G.D.Gupta, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Vikram Saini, Advocate versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.S.N.Gupta, Advocate W.P.(C) 8093-8102/2003 LINI JAMES & ORS. Represented by: ..... Petitioners Mr.G.D.Gupta, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Vikram Saini, Advocate versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.V.K.Tandon, Advocate with Mr.Yogesh Saini, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) 1. The record of this court would reveal that in the last 3 years it has decided at least 75 writ petitions concerning employees working under the Government of NCT of Delhi, the erstwhile Municipal Corporation of Delhi and now the three trifurcated Corporations as also the New Delhi Municipal Cou...
- ‹ Prev
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 52
- 53
- Next ›
- Last »