Delhi Court November 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Shaukat Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-25-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % CRL.A. 1094/2010 Date of Decision:25. h November, 2013 + # SHAUKAT ..... Appellant Through: Mr. J.S. Kushwaha, Advocate ! versus $ STATE ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, APP & % # CRL.A. 597/2012 MEERA @ MILAN ! ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sumeet Verma, Advocate versus $ * STATE ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, APP CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K.BHASIN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.P. VAISH JUDGMENT P.K. BHASIN, J: The appellants along with another accused Feroz were convicted for the commission of the offences punishable under Sections 120-B and 364-A of the Indian Penal Code('IPC' for short) by the learned Additional Sessions Judge vide judgment dated 2nd July, 2010 and vide order dated 7th July, 2010 they were sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and also to pay fine of Rs.500/- each, in default of payment of fine were ordered to undergo further simple imprisonment of six months under Section 364-A IPC. They were also sent...
Oracle India Private Limited Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-25-2013
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI INCOME TAX APPEAL NOS. 25/2012, 287/2008, 417/2009, 447/2009, 461/2009, 683/2009 Reserved on:2. d September, 2013 Date of decision:25. h November, 2013 ORACLE INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Appellant Through Mr. M.S. Syali, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Husnal Syali Nagi, Mr. Mayank Nagi and Mr. Harkunal Anand, Advocates. versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Respondent Through Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, Sr. Standing Counsel & Mr. Puneet Gupta, Advocate. INCOME TAX APPEAL NOS. 797/2006, 951/2006, 961/2006, 390/2007 ORACLE SOFTWARE INDIA LIMITED ..... Appellant Through Mr. M.S. Syali, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Husnal Syali Nagi, Mr. Mayank Nagi and Mr. Harkunal Anand, Advocates. versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Respondent Through Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, Sr. Standing Counsel & Mr. Puneet Gupta, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA SANJIV KHANNA, J.: These 10 appeals by the assessees-Oracle India Privat...
Sunil Yadav Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and Others
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-25-2013
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:25. 11.2013 W.P.(C) 5308/2013 & CM Nos. 11894/2013 & 12944/2013 SUNIL YADAV ..... Petitioner versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & OTHERS ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant : Mr Ashwini K. Mata, Sr. Advocate with Mr Joydeep Sarma and Mr Pranav Kumar, Advocates. For the Respondent : Mr Arjun Pant, Advocate for R-1. Ms Tania Ahlawat, Advocate for Ms Avnish Ahlawat, Advocate for R-2. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. This writ petition concerns the notice inviting tender for running a central canteen which has been issued by the Delhi Technological University (formerly Delhi College of Engineering), GNCT of Delhi. The NIT was issued in April, 2013. The said NIT reads as under :F. No.DTU/GA/64/2012-13 WP (C)5308/2013 NOTICE INVITING TENDER FOR RUNNING CENTRAL CANTEEN Sealed tenders are invited under two bid system from ...
Meera @ Milan Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-25-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % CRL.A. 1094/2010 Date of Decision:25. h November, 2013 + # SHAUKAT ..... Appellant Through: Mr. J.S. Kushwaha, Advocate ! versus $ STATE ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, APP & % # CRL.A. 597/2012 MEERA @ MILAN ! ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sumeet Verma, Advocate versus $ * STATE ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, APP CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K.BHASIN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.P. VAISH JUDGMENT P.K. BHASIN, J: The appellants along with another accused Feroz were convicted for the commission of the offences punishable under Sections 120-B and 364-A of the Indian Penal Code('IPC' for short) by the learned Additional Sessions Judge vide judgment dated 2nd July, 2010 and vide order dated 7th July, 2010 they were sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and also to pay fine of Rs.500/- each, in default of payment of fine were ordered to undergo further simple imprisonment of six months under Section 364-A IPC. They were also sent...
Naresh Kumar Etc. Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-25-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :21. t NOVEMBER, 2013 DECIDED ON :25. h NOVEMBER, 2013 + CRL.A. 389/2003 & CRL.M.A.Nos. 1592/2003 & 7482/2004 NARESH KUMAR ETC. ....Appellants Through : Mr.Chirag Madan, Advocate with Mr.Sudeep Yadav, Advocate. versus .Respondent STATE Through : Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. Naresh Kumar (A-1) (since deceased) represented by Smt.Kanta, Dharam Singh (A-2), Om Prakash (A-3), Ashok and Tripat were arrested in case FIR No.122/96 under Sections 308/34 IPC registered at PS J.P.Kalan and sent for trial on the allegations that on 05.12.1996 at about 12.10 (Noon) in furtherance of common intention, they inflicted injuries to Balwan Singh and Vijay Singh. Vide order dated 01.04.1999, they were charged under Sections 308/325/34 IPC. The prosecution examined twelve witnesses to bring home their guilt. In their 313 statements, they pleaded false implication and examined DW-1 (Suresh Kumar) in defence. On ...
Aman Singh Shirnet Vs. University of Delhi and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-25-2013
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:25. 11.2013 + W.P.(C) 7205/2013 and CM No.15508/2013(for directions) AMAN SINGH SHIRNET ..... Petitioner Through:Ms.Anisha Upadhyay, Advocate versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ANR ..... Respondents Through:Mr.Mohinder J.S.Rupal, Adv. for Respondent. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN JUDGEMENT V.K. JAIN, J.(ORAL) The following directions were issued by this Court in WP (C) No.5074/2013 on 25.9.2013:i. the respondent Delhi University shall re-work the results of all the candidates who appeared in BMS Entrance Examination 2013 in terms of this order, within one (1) week from today and shall immediately thereafter display the revised results on its website. ii. Within ten (10) days from today, the respondentUniversity shall issue public notice requiring candidates five times the number of seats available in each category, who were not offered admission during the previous counseling, to attend counseling on a date which the Univ...
Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi Xvi. Vs. Arun Malhotra
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-25-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ITA Nos. 923/2009 & 1157/2009 Reserved on:27. h August, 2013 Date of Decision:25. h November, 2013 % Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi XVI. ....Appellant Through Ms. Suruchi Aggarwal, Sr. Standing Counsel. Versus Arun Malhotra Respondent Through Mr. S. Krishnan, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA SANJIV KHANNA, J.This common order will dispose of the two appeals preferred by the Revenue i.e. Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi XVI, against Arun Malhotra, respondent assessee. These appeals arise out of the common order of the tribunal dated 5th September, 2008 relating to block assessment period 1st April, 1989 to 14th July, 1999. Two appeals have been preferred by the Revenue as two cross appeals were filed against the order of the first appellate authority, Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) by both Revenue and the assessee.2. By order dated 7th May, 2012 the following substantial question ...
Joginder Singh @ Mor Vs. State of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-25-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :20. h SEPTEMBER, 2013 DECIDED ON :25. h NOVEMBER, 2013 + CRL.A. 250/2003 JOGINDER SINGH @ MOR Through : ..... Appellant Mr.Rajeev Gaur Naseem, Advocate. versus STATE OF DELHI Through : + ..... Respondent Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP. CRL.A. 327/2003 KULDIP KUMAR @ RAJU LANGDA Through : ..... Appellant Mr.Anurag Jain, Advocate. versus STATE OF DELHI Through : AND + ..... Respondent Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP. CRL.A. 63/2005 SUNIL @ GANJA ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Sitab Ali Chaudhary, Advocate. versus THE STATE Through : ..... Respondent Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. Joginder Singh @ Mor (A-1), Kuldip Kumar @ Raju Langda (A-2) & Sunil @ Ganja (A-3) impugn a judgment dated 01.04.2003 of learned Addl. Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.38/98 arising out of FIR No.339/95 PS Janak Puri by which they were convicted under Sections 307/34 IPC and 25/27 Arms Act. By an order dated 02.04.2003, they wer...
Chandro Devi and ors. Vs. Manav Bharti India International School
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-25-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Order delivered on: November 25, 2013 + CM(M) 371/2013 & C.M. No.5616/2013 CHANDRO DEVI & ORS Through ..... Petitioners Mr.Yashvir Sethi, Adv. with Ms.Manisha Agrawal & Mr.Ranjan Tyagi, Advs. versus MANAV BHARTI INDIA INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL ..... Respondent Through Mr.R.K.Vats, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.(ORAL) 1. By way of the present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has assailed order dated 21st December, 2012 passed by the Learned Civil Judge, whereby the application of the respondent under Order XXII Rule 9 read with Section 151 CPC was allowed and the suit abated in 2001 upon the death of the sole defendant was restored.2. The petitioners being legal representatives of Late Laxmi Chand, instituted a suit for permanent injunction against the respondent restraining them from dispossessing him from the suit property as Suit A which was pending when Laxmi Chand died o...
Reetika Kaur Vs. Darshan Singh Combow and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-25-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Order delivered on: November 25, 2013 + CM(M) No.338/2013 REETIKA KAUR Through ..... Petitioner Ms.Meenakshi Midha, Adv. versus DARSHAN SINGH COMBOW & ORS ..... Respondents Through Respondent No.4 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. By way of filing of the present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has assailed the impugned order dated 3rd August, 2012 passed by the Addl. District Judge-03 (North), Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi in RCA No.70/2010.2. The petitioner/plaintiff filed a suit for declaration with the averments that respondents/defendants No.3 & 4 are the natural parents of the petitioner while respondents/defendants No.1 & 2 are her adopted parents. Respondents No.3 & 4 are legally married and out of the wedlock, the petitioner was born on 3rd April, 1986 at New Delhi. Respondents No.1 & 2 are the relatives of respondents No.3 & 4 who had three sons but no daughte...
- ‹ Prev
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- Next ›
- Last »