Skip to content

Chennai Orders Court February 2026 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Feb 02 2026

RAMESH Vs The State Rep. by its Inspector of Police,

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Feb-02-2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 06.02.2026CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN and Crl.M.P.No.22494 of 2025 Ramesh ...Petitioner -Vs- State Rep. By its The Inspector of Police, Crime No.38 of 2024 ...Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Revision Petition is filed under Section 442 of BNSS, praying to call for the records and set aside the order passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Principal POCSO Court, Salem District, in Crl.M.P.No.1072 of 2025 in Spl.S.C.No.38 of 2025 dated 17.10.2025. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Arivazhagan For Respondent : Mr.R.Vinoth Raja, Government Advocate (Crl.Side)SUNDER MOHAN, J.TsgORDERThe case was listed under the caption for being mentioned 2.Heard the learned counsel on either sides. 3.This Court is of the view that no further clarification is required as regards the order passed by this Court on 02.02.2026 and the same stands confirmed. 06.02.2026 Tsg To 1.The Sessions Judge, Principal POCSO Court, Salem District. 2.The Inspector of Police, ...


Feb 02 2026

Dr.Soundarya G, Vs Dr.P.Senthil Kumar, IAS., and 3 others

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Feb-02-2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 02.02.2026CORAM :THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY Dr.Soundarya .. PetitionerVersus1. Dr.P.Senthil Kumar, IAS, The Principal Secretary to the Government, Health and Family Welfare Department, Government of Tamil Nadu, Fort St. George, Chennai 600 009.2. Dr.R.Suganthy Rajakumari, The Director of Medical Education, Directorate of Medical Education, Kilpauk, Chennai 600 010.3. Dr.Parameswari Srijayanth, The Registrar, Dr.M.G.R.Medical University, No.69, Anna Salai, Guindy, Chennai 600 032.4. Dr.K.Shantharam, The Dean, Madras Medical College, Park Town, Chennai 600 003. .. RespondentsPrayer : Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Court Act, 1971, to pass an order punishing the respondents for committing contempt this Court by willfully, intentionally and deliberately violating the order, dated 03.09.2025 passed in W.P.No.33377 of 2025 by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Ramamoorthi For Respondents...


Feb 02 2026

Karthikpandi vs the Commissioner of Corporation

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Feb-02-2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 02-02-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN Karthikpandi Petitioner Vs1. The Commissioner of Corporation Coimbatore Corporation, Coimbatore District.2. The Tamil Nadu state Road TransportCorporation (Kovai), Limited, 37, Mettupalayam Road, Coimbatore 641043 (R2 has been suo moto impleaded vide order of this Court dated 02.02.2026) Respondent PRAYER Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to dispose the representation dated 11.10.2025 and not to construct a bus stop in front of door no.7 and 8 of N.H.Road, Coimbatore. For Petitioner: Mr.J.Franklin For Respondent: Mr.G.Vinoth for Mr.N.Umapathi, Additional Government Pleader for R1 Mr.Murali Vinoth for R2ORDERThe Tamil Nadu State Road Transport Corporation (Kovai), Limited, 37, Mettupalayam Road, Coimbatore 641043 is suo moto impleaded as second respondent to the writ petition.2. I he...


Feb 02 2026

Mr. Govindaprasad and another Vs Mr. M.S.Ganesh

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Feb-02-2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 02-02-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI1. Mr. Govindaprasad and another S/o. R. Sundararajan, T2, Malles2. Mrs. Radha Govindaprasad, W/o.Govindaprasad, T2, Malles Petitioner(s) Vs1. Mr. M.S.GaneshS/o. MM Samy, Flat No. B-4, No.6, PCO Road, Egmore, Chennai 600 008. Contemnor(s) PRAYER To take Contempt Proceedings against the respondents for non-compliance of the order passed by this Court in C.M.A.No. 2135 of 2025 dated 06.08.2025 and punish the respondents For Petitioner(s): MR. K.M.Srirangan For Contemnor(s): Mr.K.A.MariappanORDERBoth side counsel appeared before this court. As directed by this Court, the petitioner appeared through Video Conference and respondent appeared before this Court.2. The respondent handed over the key pertaining to subject property tolandlord/contempt petitioner. After deliberations, the rental arrears reduced to Rs.10,00,000/- and out of which, the respondent agreed to pay a sum of Rs.7,50,00...


Feb 02 2026

The Branch Manager Vs Selvanathan

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Feb-02-2026

This petition is filed to condone the delay of 76 days in preferring the above Civil Miscellaneous Appeal.2. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant.3. Ms.S. Vasavi Sridevi, learned counsel, who takes notice for the 1 st respondentand Mr.S. Santhosa Kumar, learned counsel, who takes notice for the 2 nd respondent did not raise any objection in allowing this petition. This court is satisfied with the reasons attributed in the affidavit filed in support of this petition. Hence, the petition is ordered.4. The Registry is directed to number the above Civil Miscellaneous Appeal, if it is otherwise in order, and list the same on 16.02.2026 and print the name of the counsel for the 1st and 2nd respondent in the cause list. bga bga...


Feb 02 2026

The Branch Manager vs Vembu

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Feb-02-2026

This petition is filed to condone the delay of 76 days in preferring the above Civil Miscellaneous Appeal.2. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant.3. Ms.S. Vasavi Sridevi, learned counsel, who takes notice for the 1 st respondentand Mr.S. Santhosa Kumar, learned counsel, who takes notice for the 2 nd respondent did not raise any objection in allowing this petition. This court is satisfied with the reasons attributed in the affidavit filed in support of this petition. Hence, the petition is ordered.4. The Registry is directed to number the above Civil Miscellaneous Appeal, if it is otherwise in order, and list the same on 16.02.2026 and print the name of the counsel for the 1st and 2nd respondent in the cause list. bga bga...


Feb 02 2026

Midhalraj Vs The State Rep By, The Inspector Of Police

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Feb-02-2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 02.02.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE K. RAJASEKAR CRL OP No.412 of 2026 Midhalraj S/o. Nousath, Chathoth Vattiyamthode, Vayathur, Kannur. Kerala State - 670705. ... Petitioner Vs. State rep. by, The Inspector of Police, (Crime No.304 of 2024) ... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of B.N.S.S Act, to enlarge the petitioner/accused -1 on bail in pending trial in C.C.No.395 of 2025 in Crime No.304 of 2024, on the file of the I- Additional District Judge, Special Court for the EC and NDPS Act, at Chennai. For Petitioner : Mr. D.P.Vishal For Respondent : Mr. A.Gopinath, Government Advocate (Crl. Side) *******ORDERThe petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 12.11.2024, for the offences punishable under Sections 8(c), 20(b)(ii)(C), 25 and 29(1) of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, (NDPS) 1985, in connection with Crime No.304 of 2024, on the file of the respondent Poli...


Feb 02 2026

K.Madhesh vs the Superintending Engineer

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Feb-02-2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 02-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA K.Madhesh Son of Kaliappan No.1/88 Virupachipuram, Vennampatti Main Road, Dharmapuri. ..Petitioner(s) Vs1. The Superintending Engineer2. The Project Director Near KAKC Petrol Bunk, By-Pass, Krishnagiri 635001.3. The Special Tahsildhar Land Acquisition Dharmapuri 636701.4. The Executive Engineer ..Respondent(s)PRAYER : Writ Petition is filed seeking a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to make provisions for access to the petitioners property in S.No.603/2E1 situated at Pappinaickanahalli Village, Dharmapuri Taluk and District from the NH-844 by removing the electricity No. 006-018-108-158 which is fixed on a wall on the land acquired by the 2 nd respondent at Page1 of 5 Pappinackanahalli Village comprised in S.No. 603/2E2 Dharmapuri Taluk and District considering the petitioners representation dated 10.03.2025 07.04.2025 and 16.10.2025. For Petitioner(s): Mr.J.Bharathi Raja For...


Feb 02 2026

In Re - vs the Debts Recovery Tribunal

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Feb-02-2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 02.02.2026CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R. SURESH KUMAR AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SHAMIM AHMED In re: Delay in releasing orders passed by the Tribunal .. Petitioner Vs. Rep. By its Registrar Coimbatore. .. Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of mandamus, in respect of delay in releasing orders passed by the Debts Recovery Tribunal and to grant such or other orders as this Court may deem fit. Amicus Curiae : Mrs.Ananda GomathyORDER(Order of the Court was made by R.SURESH KUMAR, J.) Though this suo motu writ petition has been taken up after noticing that the orders which were passed by the Debts Recovery Tribunals were not uploaded for many months, pursuant to the orders, subsequently been passed by this Court on various dates, affidavits have been filed and by our order dated 05.01.2026, we directed the Debts Recovery Tribunal II, Chennai, to file anaffidavit, as it had ...


Feb 02 2026

K.K.Karuppusamy, Vs S.Burushotham Alwyn,

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Feb-02-2026

in This application has been filed to condone the delay of 144 days in representing the First Appeal A.S.Sr.No.94461 of 2025 in O.S.No.329 of 2017 on the file of IV Additional District Court at Udumalpet.2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.3. I have independently gone through the affidavit filed in support of this petition, and I am satisfied that the petitioner has made out sufficient cause and accordingly, this Civil Miscellaneous Petition is ordered. jd jd in...



AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial