Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

The Branch Manager vs Vembu

The Branch Manager vs Vembu

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Feb 02, 2026
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1498428

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CMP/30483/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

The Branch Manager

Respondent

Vembu

Excerpt

this petition is filed to condone the delay of 76 days in preferring the above civil miscellaneous appeal.2. heard the learned counsel for the appellant.3. ms.s. vasavi sridevi, learned counsel, who takes notice for the 1 st respondentand mr.s. santhosa kumar, learned counsel, who takes notice for the 2 nd respondent did not raise any objection in allowing this petition. this court is satisfied with the reasons attributed in the affidavit filed in support of this petition. hence, the petition is ordered.4. the registry is directed to number the above civil miscellaneous appeal, if it is otherwise in order, and list the same on 16.02.2026 and print the name of the counsel for the 1st and 2nd respondent in the cause list. bga bga

Full Judgment

This petition is filed to condone the delay of 76 days in preferring the above Civil Miscellaneous Appeal.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant.

3. Ms.S. Vasavi Sridevi, learned counsel, who takes notice for the 1 st respondent

and Mr.S. Santhosa Kumar, learned counsel, who takes notice for the 2 nd respondent did not raise any objection in allowing this petition. This court is satisfied with the reasons attributed in the affidavit filed in support of this petition. Hence, the petition is ordered.

4. The Registry is directed to number the above Civil Miscellaneous Appeal, if it is otherwise in order, and list the same on 16.02.2026 and print the name of the counsel for the 1st and 2nd respondent in the cause list. bga bga

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial