Chennai Orders Court February 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
C. Anandasundaraman vs C. Tripurasundari
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 02-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V. KARTHIKEYAN AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU C. Anandasundararaman ..Appellant(s) Vs1. C. Tripurasundari2. A. Manimaran3. E.E.N. Real Estates / E.E.N Xerox4. Aavin Old Washermenpet Milk New No.901, Old No.293, T.H. Road, Old Washermenpet, Chennai- 21.5. Magic Vision T.H. Road, Old Washermenpet, Chennai-21. Page1 of 46. National Tiffin Centre T.H. Road, Old Washermenpet, Chennai-21. ..Respondent(s)Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent and OrderXXXVI Rule 1 of the O.S.Rules to allow the above Original Side appeal and set aside the Judgment and Decree dated 16.02.2018 of the Learned Judge made in CS No.438 of 2010. For Appellant(s): Mr.Wilson Topaz for M/s.A.S.Kailasam For Respondent(s): Mr.P.Sunil for Mr.T.Viswanatha Rao For R1 R2 to R6 - Dismissed (vide Court Order Dated 22/03/2024)JUDGMENT(Judgment of the Court was delivered by C.V.Karthikeyan, J.) The matter has ...
T. Muthuvel, Vs Usha
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 02.02.2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR in T.Muthuvel ...Petitioner/Petitioner Vs Usha, Virudhunagar District. ....Contemnor/2nd Respondent PRAYER: Contempt Petition is filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to initiate the contempt proceedings against the Contemnor/2 nd Respondent herein, for her willful disobedience and non-compliance of theorder 17.12.2024, made in WP(MD)No.27213 of 2024 on the file of High Courtof Madras Madurai Bench. For Petitioner : M/s.R.Suriya Narayanan For Respondent : Mr.N.Satheesh Kumar Additional Government PleaderORDERThe order of this Court has already been complied with. Recording the same, this Contempt petition stands closed. NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet: Yes/No RJR To Virudhunagar District.R.VIJAYAKUMAR, J.RJR in...
K. Dhileepan Vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Q-Branc ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 02/02/2026 PRESENT The HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY in CRL OP(MD). No.9391 of 2025 K. Dhileepan, S/o. Kulasingam, ... Petitioner/Accused Vs State of Tamilnadu Rep by Inspector of Police, Q-Branch Ccb,, Madurai. Cr.No.1 of 2019.. ... Respondent/ComplainantFor Petitioner : Mr.G.Sonai Bothi Rajan, For Respondent : Mr.S.S.Manoj Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR RELAXATION Under Sec.439(1)b of Cr.P.C PRAYER :- To modify the condition in Para 5 imposed by this Honourable Court in Crl.O.P.(MD). No. 9391 of 2025 dated 20.06.2025 as of lodging at Special Camp, Cheyyar and alter the same that the petitioner shall be released on bail without being lodged at any..ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-The present modification petition has been filed to modify the condition in para No.5 imposed by this Court in Crl.O.P(MD).No.9391 of 2025 dated 20.06.2025.2. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Sid...
V.Ponraj Vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Superintendent Of Police,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 02.02.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI V.Ponraj ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The State of Tamil Nadu, The Superintendent of Police, O/o The Superintendent of Police, 2.The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep.by The Deputy Superintendent of Police, O/o The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Nilakottai, 3.The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep.by The Sub Inspector of Police, Batlagundu Police Station, 4.Davamani 5.Suriya Prakash 6.Kathikeyan 7.Sushila 8.Manimegalai ... Respondents Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023, to direct the respondent nos.1 to 3 to provide adequate police protection to the life and limb of the petitioner based on the representation dated 05.01.2026 made before the respondents nos.1 to 3. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Murugan For R1 R3 : Mr.M.Sakthi Kumar Government Advocate(Crl.Side)ORDERThis criminal original petition is filed to direct the respondent nos.1 to 3 to provide adequate police...
Durai @ Duraipandian Vs The State Of Tamilnadu, Rep. By The Inspector ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) PRESENT The HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY in Durai @ Duraipandian, S/o.Subba Naidu, ... Petitioner/Accused Vs The State of Tamilnadu, Rep., By the Inspector of Police,, (Crime No.39 of 2025). ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.K. Manavalan, For Respondent : Mr.S.S.Manoj, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR RELAXATION Under Sec.439(1)b of Cr.P.C PRAYER :- To relax the condition imposed on the petitioner in Crl OP.(MD). No. 20125 of 2025 dated 14.11.2025.ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-This petition has been filed to modify the condition imposed on the petitioner in Crl OP.(MD). No.20125 of 2025 dated 14.11.2025.2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been complying with the condition imposed by this court regularly and he prays for modification of the said condition.3. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) submitted that the petition...
S.Irin Chandra Vs The Joint Registrar of Cooperative Societies
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 02.02.2026CORAM :THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI S.Irin Chandra ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Joint Registrar of Cooperative Societies, Nagercoil Region, N Nagercoil-629 001, 2.The Deputy Registrar of Cooperative Societies, Thuckkalai-629 175 3.The Managing Director/ Special Officer, Y.285, Kalkulam Vilavankodu Taluks Agricultural Producers Co-operative Marketing Society Ltd., Marthandam-629 165, 4.Tmt.D.Latha Kumari, Senior Clerk, Y.285, Kalkulam Vilavankodu Taluks Agricultural Producers Co-operative Marketing Society Ltd., Marthandam-629 165, Kanniyakumari District. ... RespondentsPrayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents 1 to 3 to consider the petitioner's representation dated 09.11.2025 and promote the petitioner as Senior Clerk, on the basis of petitioner's Seniority over and above the 4th respondent in the cadre ...
The Tamil Nadu Judicial vs the Commissioner of Treasuries
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 02.02.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R.KALAIMATHI The Tamil Nadu Judicial Bailiffs Association, State Centre At Madurai District Court, Madurai, Through its President, T.Thambidhurai. ... Petitioner Vs. Chennai - 15. ... RespondentPrayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 30.01.2012 for grant of 5% PP to all bailiff working on or after 01.08.1992 in the Suordinate Judiciary as per order passed by this Court in W.P(MD).No.8818 of 2008 dated 13.10.2009 and as per order of the Government dated 10.09.2010 implementing the order of this Court.For Petitioner : Mr.R.V.Rajkumar For Respondent : Mr.S.S.Madhavan, Addl. Government Pleader.ORDER(By G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.) The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Co...
R.Chellapandian Vs The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by The Superintendent ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
in Crl.R.C.(MD)SR.No.1263 of 2026 Heard Mr.N.Gurusamy, learned counsel for Petitioner and Mr.Vaikkam Karunanithi, learned Government Advocate (Crl.side).2. The learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits that this CriminalMiscellaneous Petition has been filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, seeking to condone the delay of 36 days in filing the criminal revision case against the order passed in Crl.M.P.No.817 of 2025 dated 01.09.2025 by the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Virudhunagar.3. Mr.Vaikkam Karunanithi, learned Government Advocate (Crl.side), has stated that he has no objection in allowing this petition.4. Being satisfied with reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition, the delay of 36 days in filing the above criminal revision case is condoned.5. Registry is directed to number the Criminal Revision case, if it is otherwise in order. gvn gvn in Crl.RC(MD).SR.No.1263 of 2026...
M.Alex Vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Viruveedu
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 02-02-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ M.Alex Petitioner(s) Vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Viruveedu Police Station In Crime No. 792 of 2020. Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s): M/s.V.P.RajanFor Respondent (s): Mr.P.Kottaichamy Government Advocate Prayer: Criminal Revision Case is filed under Section 438 and 442 of BNSS, to set aside the order made in Crl.M.P.No.431/2025 dated 03.06.2025 on the file of Judicial Magistrate Court, Nilakkottai and pass such further or other orders as this Honble Court. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, after submitting a brief while, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present Criminal Revision case with liberty to work out his remedy in accordance with law, and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.2. In view of the submission and the endorsement made by thelearned counsel appearing fo...
Palpandi Vs Kamatchi
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 02.02.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR and CMP(MD) No.985 of 2026 Palpandi ... Petitioner Vs 1.Kamatchi 2.Minor. Logeshwaran ... Respondents PRAYER :-Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to call for the records relating to the fair and Decreetal order in I.A.No. 1 of 2025 in HMOP.No. 202 of 2025 on the file of the Family Judge, Dindigul District dated 21.11.2025. For Petitioner : Mr.Shanmuga SundaramORDERThis Civil Revision Petition has been filed challenging the ordermade in I.A.No.1 of 2025 in HMOP.No.202 of 2025 on the file of the Family Court, Dindigul, dated 21.11.2025.2.The petitioner and the first respondent are the husband and wife and the marriage between them was solemnized on 23.01.2019, according to Hindu Rites and Customs. Due to difference of opinion, the petitioner/husband has filed HMOP.No.202 of 2025 against the first respondent/wife before the Family Court ...
- ‹ Prev
- 658
- 659
- 660
- 661
- 662
- 664
- 665
- 666
- 667
- 668
- Next ›
- Last »