Chennai Orders Court February 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
A.Meenal vs R.M.Kannappan
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 02.02.2026CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN 1.A.Meenal 2.KNM.Mahathi Sai (minor) Daughter of R.M.Kannappan, (Minor Represented by her mother, the first petitioner) Both residing at No.B-3, Senthoor Flats, 9th Street, Kumaran Colony, Vadapalani, Chennai 600 026. ...Petitioners -Vs- R.M.Kannappan ...Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Revision Petition is filed under Sections 438 r/w 442 of BNSS, praying to enhance the interim maintenance from Rs.4,000/- (Rupees Eight Thousand Only) each to Rs.30,000/- (Rupees Sixty Thousand only) to each of the 1st petitioners and the 2nd petitioners (minor child) as ordered in M.P.No.1278 of 2022 in M.C.No.455 of 2021 dated 09.09.2024. For Petitioners : Ms.R.Ajitha For Respondent : Mr.S.Vasanth KumarORDERThe Criminal Revision Case has been filed seeking enhancement of interim maintenance awarded by the learned V Additional Principal Judge, Chennai vide order dated 09.09.2024 in M.P.No.1278 of 2022 i...
Malarselvi Vs Thanapal
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
in Though the 2nd respondent remains unserved, the 1st respondent is the contesting respondent. The petitioner, who is the decree holder, seeks condonation of a delay of 130 days in preferring the first appeal against the fair and decreetal order, dated 12.12.2024 made in R.E.A.No.4 of 2024.2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.3. The learned counsel for the first respondent has no serious objection to the petition being allowed.4. I have independently gone through the affidavit filed in support of thispetition, and I am satisfied that the petitioner has made out sufficient cause and accordingly, this Civil Miscellaneous Petition is ordered and post this matter on 09.02.2026. jd jd in...
Rajaratnam Sabapathy vs the Additional Commissioner of Income-Tax,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 02.02.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN and W.M.P.Nos.28649 & 28652 of 2023 Rajaratnam Sabapathy ... Petitioner in both W.Ps Vs.1. The Additional Commissioner of Income-taxCentral Circle, Central Range 1, Room No.310, New Building III Floor, Investigation Building, No.46 (Old No.108), Mahatma Gandhi Road, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600034.2. The Assistant / Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle 1(2), 3rd Floor, Investigation Building, No.46 (Old No.108), Mahatma Gandhi Road, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600 034. ... Respondents in both W.PsPrayer in W.P.No.29063 of 2023: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records in DIN & Notice No: ITBA/PNL/F/271D/2023-24/1056009503(1) dated 08.09.2023 on the file of the 1st Respondent relating to the A.Y.2021-22 and quash the same. Prayer in W.P.No.29065 of 2023: Writ Petition filed under Articl...
The State of Tamil Nadu vs K.Shanthi
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 02.02.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN C.M.P.No.20116 of 2025 in W.A.No.121378 of 2025 The State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by its Secretary, Department of Industries Fort St George, Chennai 600 009 and 2 others Applicant(s) Vs K.Shanthi C/o.K.S.Abishek, No. 008, Southern Springs Apartments, 1st Main, 7th Cross, RK Township, Yarandahalli, Boomasandra, Bangalore-560105. Respondent(s) For Applicant(s): Mr. E.Vijay Anand Addl. Government PleaderORDER(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) Heard.2. This application is filed to dispense with the production of the certified copy of the common order dated 1.3.2023 made in W.P.No.3275 of 2023.3. For the reasons stated in the affidavit, the prayer for exemption in filing of original impugned common order is allowed. Application is allowed. (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA,CJ) (G.ARUL MURUGAN,J) 02.02.2026 ...
Rajas Dental College and Hospital vs Union of India
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
2026:MHC:419IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 02-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN Rajas Dental College And Hospital Rep by its Chairman, Kavalkinaru Junction, Tirunelveli District- 627105. ..Appellant(s) Vs ..Respondent(s) Page1 of 4 Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent Act for issuing a writ of certiorarified mandamus, to set aside the order dated 28.07.2023 passed in W.P.No. 24082 of 2021. For Appellant(s): Mr.Santhosh For M/S.Krishna Law Associates For Respondent(s): Mr.K. Srinivasa Murthy, Senior Panel Counsel For R1 Mr.Subramanian Vaidyanathan For R2. Mr.G.Arumugam, For R3. Mrs.M.Sneha, Special Counsel For R4.JUDGMENT(Judgment of the Court was delivered by S.M.Subramaniam J.) Learned counsel for the appellant would seek permission of this Court to withdraw the present writ appeal. He has made an endorsement to that effect in the Court bundle.2. Learned Senior Panel Counsel appearing ...
Natesan.P vs the Management of Mentor Printing and
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 02.02.2026CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY Natesan.P .. Petitioner in W.M.P.Nos.37269 of 2025 Shiyam S .. Petitioner in W.M.P.Nos.37299 of 2025 Karthik D .. Petitioner in W.M.P.Nos.37301 of 2025 Viswanathan P .. Petitioner in W.M.P.Nos.37305 of 2025 Annadurai P .. Petitioner in W.M.P.Nos.37309 of 2025 Vs1. The Management of Mentor,Printing and Logistics Private Limited, Mr.Rajendran, No.B-50 and B-51, SIPCOT Industrial Park, Irungattukottai, Sriperumbudur Taluk, Kanchipuram District-602 117. 2.The Deputy Commissioner of Labour (Conciliation -1) Kanchipuram District. 602 105. ... Respondents in all cases For Petitioner : Mr.S.Sivakumar in all cases For Respondents : Mr.S.Nedunchezhiyan in all casesCOMMON ORDERIn all these matters, the writ petitions are filed challenging the impugned orders which refused to grant approval for the punishment of dismissal from service imposed by the management.2. Therefore, it can be...
A.ARIVARASAN Vs The State rep by its The Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 02.02.2026CORAM:THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA and Crl.M.P.No.17027 of 2025 A.Arivarasan ... Petitioner Vs.1. State represented by, The Inspector of Police, Villianur Police Station, Puducherry. (Crime No.94 of 2023)2. Vijayalakshmi ... RespondentsPRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, to call for records in Crime No.94 of 2023, on the file of the first respondent Police and quash the FIR to secure the ends of justice. For Petitioner : Mr.M.S.Akash Daniel For R1 : Mr.M.V.Ramachandramurthy Public Prosecutor (Puducherry) Assisted by Mr.A.Alexander Government Advocate (Puducherry) For R2 : Mr.S.A.SecularA.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.hamORDERThis Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking to quash the First Information Report in Crime No.94 of 2023, on the file of the first respondent Police.2. When the matter was taken up for hearing today, the learnedPub...
P.Veerabadran Vs The Secretary to Government
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 02-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR IN P.Veerabadran ..Petitioner(s) Vs1. The Secretary to Government Micro, Small Medium Enterprises Department, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai-9.2. The Board of Directors3. The Managing Director ..Respondent(s)Prayer: This Writ Miscellaneous Petition is filed under Section 226 of the Constitution of India to dispense with the production of the original copy of the impugned order of the third respondent made in Rc. No.2729/ A1/2015 dated 18.7.2017. For Petitioner(s): B.Vijay Page1 of 3HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR, J.SHAORDERThis petition is filed to dispense with the production of the original copy of the impugned order of the third respondent made in Rc. No.2729/ A1/2015 dated 18.7.2017. 2.Considering the fact that sufficient reasons have been stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition on hand, the production of the original copy of the impugned order of the third ...
M.Saravanakumar vs N.R.Kandasamy
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 02-02-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.B. BALAJI in in M.Saravanakumar Appellant(s) Vs N.R.Kandasamy Respondent(s) For Appellant(s): Mr.N.ManoharanORDERThis Court, vide order dated 17.12.2024, has condoned the delay of 55 days in filing the appeal in AS.SR.No.66731 of 2024, subject to the payment of costs of Rs.1,000/- to the State Legal Service Authority, within a period of 10 days.2. It appears that the papers were subsequently misplaced and, uponrequest, the bundle was re-constructed. The learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner has inadvertently failed to take note of the conditional order, directing the payment of costs of Rs.1,000/- to the State Legal Service Authority. Hence, the present Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed,seeking extension of time to pay the costs of Rs.1,000/- imposed in the orderdated 17.12.2024 made in CMP No.11880 of 2024 in AS.SR.No.66731 of 2024.3. Heard the learned counsel f...
Pondicherry Hindustan Lever Thozhilalar Sangam, vs the Managing Direct ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
C.M.P.No.24815 of 2025 in W.A.Sr.No.142078 of 2025S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.andC.KUMARAPPAN, J.[Order of the Court was made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.] In view of the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, this petition is ordered and the delay of 4 days in filing the above appeal is condoned. (S.M.S.,J.) (C.K.,J.) 02.02.2026 dsa https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
- ‹ Prev
- 650
- 651
- 652
- 653
- 654
- 656
- 657
- 658
- 659
- 660
- Next ›
- Last »