Chennai Orders Court February 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Yaseen Sherif Hamed Sharieff Vs Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 02.02.2026CORAM:THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA Yaseen Sherif Hamed Sharieff ...Petitioner Vs. W-35, All Women Police Station, Abdul Razak Road, Tambaram, Chennai.2. Kulsum Neha ...RespondentsCriminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023, seeking a direction not to harass and refraining the respondent from such harassment. For Petitioner : Mr.F.Najimudeen For Respondents : Mr.S.Santhosh, GA(Crl. Side), for R1ORDERThis criminal original petition has been filed seeking to direct the 1st respondent not to harass the petitioner under the guise of enquiry.2. When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned GovernmentAdvocate (Crl. side) submitted that no case is pending against the petitioner as of now on the file of the 1st respondent-police and that the respondent- police is not harassing the petitioner unnecessarily.3. Recording the above submission made by the learned GovernmentAdvocate (Crl. Side)...
S.M.M.Anwar Ali vs the Additional Chief Secretary to Government
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
2026:MHC:430IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 02-02-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN AND1. S.M.M.Anwar Ali S/o. Sheik Mohammed Mustafa, Pallipadai Village, Chidambaram, Cuddalore District-608 001 Petitioner(s) Vs1. The Additional Chief Secretary To Department, Secretariat, Cuddalore District, Cuddalore -607 001. Chidambaram 6080015.M. Senkuttuvan S/o. Murugesan, No.2D, Saradharam Apartment, Theradi Kadai Theru, Chidambaram -608001 Respondent(s) PRAYER Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a writ of Mandamus, forbearing the Respondents 1 to 4 from interfering with the petitioners possession in lands bearing S.No.221/11 (Old S.No.78/1) Pallipadai Village, Chidambaram Taluk, Cuddalore District till the disposal of statutory Revision Petition dated 13.10.2025 (filed on 15.10.2025) pending on the file of the First Respondent on merits and in accordance with law.For Pet...
V. SURESH Vs State of Tamilnadu rep by the Superintendent of police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 02.02.2026CORAM:THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRAV.Suresh ...Petitioner Vs. State of Tamil Nadu rep by The Superintendent of police 2.State of Tamil Nadu rep by The Station House Officer, 3.The Manager Delhivery Pvt Ltd., No.174/26C, Kilkathirputhur Main Road, Sirukaveripakkam, Kanchipuram-631 502 ...Respondents Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita/Section 482 Cr.P.C., to direct the 1 st and 2nd respondent police to execute the non bailable warrant dated 30.09.2025 subsequent extension of the order in E.A.No.17 of 2025 on the file of the Honble District Consumer Redressal Commission , Tiruvannamalai issued against the 3rd respondent, arrest and produce 3rd respondent before the Honble District Consumer Redressal Commissoner , Tiruvannamalai.For Petitioner : Mr.V.Narasimma Moorthy For R1 & R2 : Mr.S.Santhosh Government Advocate (Crl.Side)ORDERThe learned counsel appea...
Selvam vs the State Rep by the Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 02.02.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR Selvam ...Petitioner Vs State, rep. By The Inspector of Police Crime No. 143 of 2025. ..Respondent Prayer : Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of BNSS Act, 2023 praying to modify the condition No.(i) imposed on the petitioner by the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Namakkal in Crl.M.P.No. 1026 of 2025 videorder dated 18.11.2025 that the petitioner/accused shall deposit a sum ofRs.1,00,000/- as refundable deposit towards damages, to the credit of the Crime No. 143 of 2025 of Velagoundampatty Police Station before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Namakkal. For Petitioner : Ms.J.Saktheeswari For Respondent : Ms.J.R.Archana Government Advocate, Criminal Side ----ORDERThis Criminal Original Petition is filed seeking modification of the orderpassed by the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Namakkal, in Crl.M.P.No.1026 of 2025 vide order dated 18.11.2025, wherein, the t...
Venkatesh (Died),1.Vimala vs Venkatalakshmamma
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
CMP.No.1856 of 2026 & SA.SR.No.122427 of 2025T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.This petition has been filed to condone the delay of 108 days in representing this Second Appeal.2. Considering the averments in the affidavit filed along with this petition, this petition is Ordered. 02.02.2026 vrc https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
M.SRIRAM Vs The Deputy Superintendent of Police,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 02-02-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN1. M.Sriram Appellant(s) Vs1. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Mayiladuthurai, Mayiladuthurai District. 2.The State Rep by, The Inspector of Police, 3.Saravanan Respondent(s) PRAYERTo call for the records in pursuant to the Crl.M.P.No.1487/2025 in Spl.SC No.220/2024 before the learned District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai District vide order dated 03.11.2025 and set aside the same. For Appellant(s): Mr. M.Vivek For Respondent(s): S.Rajakumar, Additional Public Prosecutor (For R1 And R2)ORDERThe learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this Criminal Appeal. The learned counsel has made an endorsement. Hence, this Criminal Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.2. The High Court Legal Services Committee is directed to pay the prescribedfee to Mr. Raghu Raj, learned Legal Aid Counsel appointed by this Court to assist the Court on behalf of the third respondent / ...
N.Mathaiyan Alias Tirunavukkarasu Vs C. Haripriya
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 02-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S. SOUNTHAR CRP No. 371 of 2026 and CMP Nos.2122 and 2124 of 20261. N.Mathaiyan Alias Tirunavukkarasu S/o. Narayanasamy, Res. at No. 150, Moongilpalayam,2. T. Padma @ Thirumayammal W/o. N. Mathaiyan @ Thirunavukkarasu, Res. at No. 150, Moongilpalayam,3. T. Tamilarasu S/o. N. Mathaiyan @ Tirunavukkarasu, No.415, Palakad Main Road, Shri Meenakshi Hospital, Kuniyamuthur Post, Coimbatore - 641 008. ..Petitioner(s) Vs1. C. Haripriya, W/o. Pugazhenthi, No.25, Thiru.Vi.Ka.Road, Amma Pettai, Salem - 636 003.2. T. Pugazhenthi, S/o. N. Mathiyan @ Thirunavukkarasu, No.150, Moongilpalayam, (No Relief Sought against the 2nd respondent, Hence Notice may be dispensed) ..Respondent(s) Page1 of 5Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India to call for the records pertaining to DVC No.3 of 2025 pending on the file of the Learned Additional Mahila Court at Salem and strike out th...
M.Shabeer Ahamed vs Dinesh Kumar Bothra
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 02.02.2026CORAM:THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA M.Shabeer Ahamed ... Petitioner Vs. Dinesh Kumar Bothra ... Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, to set aside the order dated 22.09.2025, made in Crl.M.P.No.6057 of 2025 in S.T.C.No.1274 of 2023 on the file of the Metropolitan Magistrate FTC -IV, George Town, Chennai. For Petitioner : Mr.S.IndrajithORDERThe present Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking to set aside the order passed by the Metropolitan Magistrate FTC -IV, George Town, Chennai, in Crl.M.P.No.6057 of 2025 in S.T.C.No.1274 of 2023, dated 22.09.2025.2. The petitioner is an accused facing trial under Section 138 ofthe Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, in S.T.C.No.1274 of 2023, on the file of the Metropolitan Magistrate Court (FTC -IV), George Town, Chennai. In the said case, the petitioner filed a petition in Crl.M.P.No.6057 o...
K.Anand Vs The State rep by The Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 02-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA and Crl.M.P.No.1349 of 20261. K.Anand2. Sumitha ..Petitioner(s) Vs1. The State rep by The Inspector of Police2. Prakash..Respondent(s) Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of B.N.S.S., to call for the records relates to Crime No.188 of 2024, on the file of the 1st respondent and quash the same. For Petitioner(s): Mr.R.John Joseph For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Santhosh, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for R1ORDERThis Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking to quash the First Information Report in Crime No.188 of 2024, pending on the file of the first respondent Police. Page1 of 3A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.2. When the matter was taken up for hearing today, the learnedGovernment Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the first respondent Police submitted that the investigation in this case has been completed and the absconding charge sheet has been filed throu...
The Secretary Vs P.Murugan
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
C.M.P.No.32561 of 2025 in W.A.SR.No.186738 of 2025R.SURESH KUMAR, J.ANDSHAMIM AHMED, J.[Order of the Court was made by R.SURESH KUMAR, J.] This civil miscellaneous petition has been filed to condone the delay of 159 days in filing the above writ appeal.2. Heard Mr.E.Veda Bagath Singh learned Special Government Pleader for the petitioners.3. Mr.B.Balaji takes notice for the 1 st respondent and Mr.M.Alagu Gowtham, learned Government Advocate takes notice for the 2nd respondent. They have no serious objection in allowing the petition.4. Having satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, this petition is ordered and the delay is condoned.5. Registry is directed to number the appeal and place the same for admission, if the papers are otherwise in order. [R.S.K., J.] [S.S.A., J.] 02.02.2026 KST https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
- ‹ Prev
- 655
- 656
- 657
- 658
- 659
- 661
- 662
- 663
- 664
- 665
- Next ›
- Last »