Chennai Orders Court February 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Palaniayammal and 2 others Vs Dr.B.Chandramohan, IAS., and 3 others
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 02.02.2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN 1.Palaniayammal 2.Balamurugan 3.Prasanth : Petitionersversus1.Dr.B.Chandramohan IAS, Secretary to Government, Revenue Department, Fort St.George, Chennai 9 2.M.Sai Kumar, Commissioner of Revenue Administration, Chepauk, Chennai 5 3.Brinda Devi, District Collector, Collectorate, Salem 636 001 4.P.Surumar, Revenue Divisional Officer, Mettur, Mettur Taluk, Salem District : Contemnors/ respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act to punish the respondents for wilfully disobeying the orders of this Court in WA No.873 of 2025 dated 24.03.2025. For Petitioners : Mr.M.Elango For Respondents : Mr.R.Ramanlaal, A.A.G. assisted by Mr.M.Habeeb Rahman, G.A. THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE ANDG.ARUL MURUGAN, J.(tar)ORDER(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice)Learned counse...
The Government of Tamil Nadu vs Sanghi Trading Corporation
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 02.02.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN C.M.P.No.21960 of 2025 in W.A.SR No.61011 of 2023 The Government of Tamil Nadu Rep. by the Commissioner and Secretary to Government, Revenue Department, Fort St. George, Chennai 600 009 and 2 others Applicant(s) Vs Sanghi Trading Corporation Rep. by its Partner, Suresh Kumar Sanghi, S/o.Dulichand Sanghi, Having Office at No.17-A, Sembudoss Street, Chennai 600 001. Respondent(s) For Applicant(s): Mr.K.Karthik Jagannath Government AdvocateORDER(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) Heard on prayer for condonation of delay in representation.2. Upon due consideration, the application is allowed. Delay is condoned.3. List for orders on the application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal. (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA,CJ) (G.ARUL MURUGAN,J) 02.02.2026 bbr...
A.Sakthivel vs the District Collector
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
2026:MHC:423IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 02.02.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN and W.M.P.Nos.39047 & 39050 of 2025A.Sakthivel ... Petitioner -vs- 1.The District Collector, O/o. The Collectorate, Sathuvacaheri, Vellore 9. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, O/o.The Collectorate, Sathuvacheri, Vellore 9. 3.The Tahsildar, Velappadi, Vellore, Vellore District 632 001. 4.The Divisional Engineer, Highways Department, 5.The Assistant Divisional Engineer, Highways Department Construction and Maintenance, 6.The Block Development Officer, Kosapet, Vellore. 7.A.Elumalai 8.E.Rishikesh 9.E.Revanth 10.E.Selvi ... RespondentsPRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records on the file of the 5th respondent relating to show cause notice Ref.No.122(14)/2025/AA dated 01.08.2025 and quash the same and consequently fo...
Kamini Devi vs the Commissioner,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
2026:MHC:431IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 02-02-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN WP No.35239 of 2025 AND WMP NO.39453 OF 20251. Kamini Devi W/o. (late). Marimuthu, 2.Muthukrishnan, S/o. K.R.Karuppanasamy, 65, Murugayyan Colony, 3.Lalitha, W/o. (late).Kannan, 4.Aruldoss, S/o.Salamon, 5.Nagamani, W/o. (late). Venkatachalam, Petitioner(s) Vs1. The Commissioner,Office Of The Commissioner, Corporation Of Coimbatore, Coimbatore. 2.The City Planner, Corporation Of Coimbatore, Coimbatore. 3.The Assistant Director /Joint Director (Mu.Koo.Po.) Coimbatore District Town And Country Planning Office, Ground Floor And 1st Floor, 50, FCI Road, Gandhimanagar, Ganapathy, Coimbatore 641004 Respondent(s) PRAYER Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the entire records pertaining to the Impugned Notice issued by the 1st respondent in N...
Kamini Devi vs the Commissioner,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
WMP.No.39452 of 2025 in WP.No.35239 of 2025 S.M. SUBRAMANIAM, J AND C.KUMARAPPAN, J (Order of the Court was made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J) This petition is ordered, on payment of separate Court fees. (S.M.S., J.) (C.K., J.) 02.02.2026 (1/2) kmi https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
The State vs a.Rengarajan
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
C.M.P.No.22948 of 2025 in W.A.SR.No.122171 of 2025R.SURESH KUMAR, J.ANDSHAMIM AHMED, J.[Order of the Court was made by R.SURESH KUMAR, J.] This civil miscellaneous petition has been filed to condone the delay of 294 days in filing the above writ appeal.2. Heard Mr.E.Veda Bagath Singh, learned Special Government Pleader for the petitioners.3. Ms.A.Shanmugapriya takes notice for the 1st respondent and she has no serious objection in allowing the petition. Despite notice having been served, none appears for the 2nd respondent.4. Having satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, this petition is ordered and the delay is condoned.5. Registry is directed to number the appeal and place the same for admission, if the papers are otherwise in order. [R.S.K., J.] [S.S.A., J.] 02.02.2026 KST https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
R.Kumaresan vs the State of Tamilnadu
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 02.02.2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN WP No.36311 of 2025 & Cont.P.No.4314 of 2025 R.Kumaresan Petitioner Vs 1.The State Of Tamil Nadu Rep by its Chief Secretary to the Government, 2.The Secretary To Government Municpal Administration & Water Supply Department, Secretariat, Fort St George, Chennai 9 3.The Secretary To Government Highways and Minor Ports Department, Secretariat, Fort St.George, Chennai-9. 4.The Secretary To Government Housing and Urban Development Department, Secretariat, Fort St.George, Chennai-9 5.The Secretary Tog Overnement Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department, Secretariat, Fort St.George, Chennai-9 6.The Director Directorate of Mines and Minerals, Guindy, Chennai-32 7.The Director Commissionarate of Municipal Administration, No.75, Urban administration Building, St.Thomas High Road, MRC Nagar, Raja Annamalaipur...
R.Rukmani vs the Commissioner
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 02.02.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI And W.M.P.Nos.39938, 39939 & 39941 of 2024 and 328 of 2026 R.Rukmani ... Petitioner Vs. CHENNAI 5. ... Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for records of the impugned proceedings of the third respondent dated 18.11.2022 bearing Se.Mu.Order No.A1/29753/2022 and impugned proceedings ofthe first respondent dated 27.01.2023 bearing Na Ka No.A1/32482/ 2022 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to include the petitioner in the promotion panel list for the post of Superintendent for the year 2011-2012 and in the promotion panel list for the post of Manager for the year 2018-2019 and in the promotion panel list for the post of Assistant Commissioner for the year 2023- 2024 in the appropriate place as per her seniority in the said promotion panel lists and grant promotion...
Jayanthi @ Indirani (Died) 1. Surekha Vs Sri Ranga Trust
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
This petition is filed to condone the delay of 29 days in filing the above Civil Miscellaneous Appeal.2. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant.3. Ms. R. Sreevidhya, learned counsel appearing for the 2nd respondent did notraise any objection in allowing this petition. This court is satisfied with the reasons attributed in the affidavit filed in support of this petition. Hence, this petition is ordered.3. The Registry is directed to number C.M.A.Sr. No.34380 of 2020, if it is otherwise in order, and list the same in the usual course.4. It is made clear that the petitioners will not be entitled for any interest for the default period, if in the event of this Court enhancing the amount of compensation fixed by the Tribunal. bga bga...
M/s.Guru Snacks, Vs Canara Bank,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 02-02-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.B. BALAJI and C.M.P.No.27830 of 20251. M/s.Guru Snacks, Rep. by its Proprietor G.Ranganathan, Shop No.2, Platform Nos.5 and 6, Chennai Mofussil Bus Terminus, Koyambedu, Chennai 600 107.2. G.RanganathanPetitioner(s) Vs Canara Bank, Egmore Branch, New No.3, Sait Colony First Street, Egmore, Chennai 08. Rep. by its Chief Manager B.Hemanth Kumar, At present Rep. by its Chief Manager, R.Sriramulu. Respondent(s) PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to strike off the petition filed in E.P.No.1779 of 2024 on the file of XXV Asst. Judge (Allikulam), Chennai, to execute the decree made in O.S.No.8387 of 2021, dated 11.11.2022, on the file of XVIII Addl. City Civil Court, Chennai.For Petitioner(s): Ms.V.J.Latha For Respondent(s): Ms.K.Vidhya Sri Theresa for Mr.S.KesavanORDERThe learned counsel for the parties state that the revision has become infructuous as...
- ‹ Prev
- 651
- 652
- 653
- 654
- 655
- 657
- 658
- 659
- 660
- 661
- Next ›
- Last »