Chennai Orders Court February 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sureshkumar vs the District Collector
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 02.02.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN Sureshkumar ... Petitioner -vs- 1.The District Collector, 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, 3.The Tahsildar, Kunnam, 4.The Inspector General of Police, Kajamalai Colony, Trichy, Trichy District. 5.The Superintendent of Police, 6.The Inspector of Police, Maruvathur Police Station, 7.Padaikathu 8.Theivakanni 9.Arumugam 10.Jayaseelan 11.Selvaraj ... RespondentsPRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 3 to consider the petitioners representations dated 12.05.2025 and 05.06.2025, thereby remove the encroachments of respondents 7 to 11 in Government land Survey No.328/1 at Perali Village, Kunnam Taluk, Perambalur District.For Petitioner : Mr.J.Milton Arul Rajendran For Respondent : Mr.T.Arun Kumar, Addl. Govt. Pleader for R1 to R3 Mr.M.Babu Mu...
Shanmugaraj vs the Thasildar
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
W.M.P.No.27891 of 2025 IN W.P.No.16049 of 2025N.ANAND VENKATESH, J.This petition has been filed to permit the petitioner to amend the respondent in the cause title. 2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. 3.This Court is convinced with the reasons assigned by the petitioner. Accordingly, this petition is allowed and the Registry is directed to carry out necessary amendment. 02.02.2026 gya https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
S.Uma vs K.Venkatesan
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 02-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S. SOUNTHAR CRP No. 3267 of 2024 and CMP No.17490 of 2024 S.Uma, W/o. K Venkatesan, D/o. Thiru Shanmugam, Door No.14/23, Manickam Street, Komarasamypatty, Salem-636 007 ..Petitioner(s) Vs K.Venkatesan, S/o. Thiru. Krishnan, Door No.158, Tamil Sangam Road, Rajaram Naagar, Salem-636 007. ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India to set aside the fair and Decreetal order dated 03-07-2024 made in I.A.No.03/2024 in G.O.P.No.529/2019 on the file of Family Court at Salem. For Petitioner(s): Mr. V.Palanikumar for Mr.A.Md.Khaleel Ul Huq For Respondent Mr.M.Loganathan Page1 of 3ORDERThe learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this court to withdraw the civil revision petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.2. Recording the submission and the endorsement made by the learnedcounsel for the petitioner, this civil revision p...
Nagappa Naicker (Died) 1.Chinnammal Vs MUTHUSAMY
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 02-02-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI CMP.No.16374 of 2025 in SA.SR.No.102648 of 20251. Nagappa Naicker (Died) 1.Chinnammal No. 3/59, Meetupalayam, Nadansai Post, Namakkal-637206.2. Maliga Parmathivelur Taluk, Namakkal-637206.3. Thangaraj4. Palaniswamy Petitioner(s) Vs1. Muthusamy S/o. Bommanaicker, Res. at 2.Palaniswamy S/o. Masanaicker, Res. at 3.Palaniswamy 4.Rangasamy Respondent(s)PRAYER : Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed under Order 41 Rule 3[A] of Code of Civil Procedure to condone the delay of 1564 days in filling of the Second Appeal. For Petitioner(s): Mr.P.Prakash Paul For Respondent(s): Mr.M.K.Boopathyrajan for Mr..K.S.Vivekanandan R1ORDERThis petition has been filed to condone the delay of 1564 days in filing the present Second Appeal.2. The learned counsel counsel appearing for the petitioners wouldsubmit that after the death of the father of the appellants as they were not aware of the disposal of the ...
The State of Tamil Nadu Vs G.Srinivasan
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 02.02.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN C.M.P.No.20482 of 2025 in W.A.No.104458 of 2025 The State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by its Secretary, Department of Industries Fort St George, Chennai 600 009 and 2 others Applicant(s) Vs G.Srinivasan S/o.K.Guruswami A2-001, L&T South City Arekere Micro Layout Bangalore-560 076 and another Respondent(s) For Applicant(s): Mr. E.Vijay Anand Addl. Government PleaderORDER(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) Heard.2. This application is filed to dispense with the production of the certified copy of the common order dated 1.3.2023 made in W.P.No.3013 of 2023.3. For the reasons stated in the affidavit, the prayer for exemption in filing of original impugned common order is allowed. Application is allowed. (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA,CJ) (G.ARUL MURUGAN,J) 02.02.2026 bbr...
The Principal Secretary to Government vs T S Saravanan
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
C.M.P.No.18357 of 2025 in W.A.SR.No.113019 of 2025R.SURESH KUMAR, J.ANDSHAMIM AHMED, J.Order of the Court was made byR.Suresh Kumar, J.Ordered. (R.S.K.,J.) (S.S.A.,J.) 02.02.2026 KST https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Gopalan vs the District Collector
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 02-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE WP No. 35275 of 2024 AND WMP NO. 38186 OF 20241. Gopalan2. M.Murugan3. M. Manoharan4. S. Nadhiya5. R.Chandiran6. M. Gopal7. M. Chinnaponnu8. A.Palanisamy9. P.Manimekalai 10.G. Balan 11.D.Rathinammal 12.G.Murugan 13.V. Mahendran 14.V.Amsa 15.R.Gowari 16.T.Sellammal 17.M. Venkatesan 18.S. Murugan 19.P.Patchamuthu 20.R.Ramesh ..Petitioner(s) Page1 of 5 Vs1. The District Collector Tiruvannamalai District, Tiruvannamalai.2. The Thasildar Mettur, Salem District3. The Village Administrative Officer Mecheri Village, Mettur Taluk, Salem District4. The Executive Officer Mecheri Special Grade Town Panchayath, Salem District ..Respondent(s)Direction seeking direction to direct the respondent to consider the representation dated 21.05.2024 made by the petitioners for providing house site patta to the petitioner in survey No 229/1 situated Subhash Nagar, Mecheri, Mettur Salem in the light the Go...
The State of Tamil Nadu Vs R. MEYYALAGAN
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
C.M.P.No.18023 of 2025 in W.A.SR.No.111752 of 2025R.SURESH KUMAR, J.ANDSHAMIM AHMED, J.Order of the Court was made byR.Suresh Kumar, J.Ordered. (R.S.K.,J.) (S.S.A.,J.) 02.02.2026 KST https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
The Commissioner of Police Vs Sathiyapriya
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
This petition is filed to condone the delay of 648 days in filing the above Civil Miscellaneous Appeal.2. Mr. J. Pradeep, learned counsel appearing for the respondents did not raiseany objection in allowing this petition. This court is satisfied with the reasons attributed in the affidavit filed in support of this petition. Hence, the petition is ordered.3. The Registry is directed to number the above Civil Miscellaneous Appeal, if it is otherwise in order, and list the same in the ususal course. bga bga...
S.Prem Kumar vs the Commissioner
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
2026:MHC:444IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 02.02.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN and W.M.P.Nos.34526 & 34527 of 2025 S.Prem Kumar ... Petitioner -vs- The Commissioner, Coimbatore Corporation, Coimbatore. ... Respondent PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the respondents notice dated 13.06.2023 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondent to remove the lock and seal to the petitioners building in Door No.10, HUDCO Nagar, (M.K.Auto Nagar), Idaiyarpalayam, Coimbatore. For Petitioner : Mr.N.K.Ponraj For Respondent : Mr.N.Velmurugan, Standing Counsel *****ORDER(Order of the Court was made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM,J.,) Notice issued under Sections 258(1) and 441 of the Coimbatore City Municipal Corporation Act, 1981 is under challenge in the present Writ Petition.2. The Commissioner, ...
- ‹ Prev
- 649
- 650
- 651
- 652
- 653
- 655
- 656
- 657
- 658
- 659
- Next ›
- Last »