Chennai Orders Court June 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Nagarajan Vs The State, Rep. by
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-27-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 27.06.2025CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M. NIRMAL KUMAR Nagarajan ... Petitioners Vs. State rep by The Inspector of Police Crime No. 305 of 2023 ... Respondent For Petitioners : M/sN.Stalin For Respondent : Mr. A.Gokulakrishnan Additional Public ProsecutorORDERThe learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this Criminal miscellaneous Petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.M. NIRMAL KUMAR, J.nr 2.In view of the submission and endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Criminal miscellaneous Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 27.06.2025 nr To1. The Inspector of Police2. The Public Prosecutor High Court, Madras....
Y.Gopalakrishna, vs Indian Bank,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-27-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 27.06.2025CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR W.P.No.4213 of 20131. Y.Gopalakrishna2. K.S.R.Murthy3. Y.Seshagiri Rao4. P.Gopala Rao5. P.S.V.L.Narasimha Rao6. Mantha Kameswara Rao7. D.Seshubabu8. N.V.Rao9. C.Sampath Kumar10. C.L.Narasimham11. G.Murali12. Ch Subramanya Sastry13. K.V.R.L.Sarma14. B.Satyam15. Avvari Narasimha Rao16. C.Sailaja17. K.Natarajeswara Rao18. A.V.Sarma19. C.V.N.Prasad20. Ch.Purushothama Sastry21. P.Madhava22. M.V.B.Satyanarayana Murthy23. B.N.Murthy24. U.J.Wuilson Babu25. P.B.T.Sundara Rao26. S.V.Gopal27. G.V.Lakshmi28. G.Satyanarayana29. M.V.Muralidhar Rao30. P.V.Narayana Rao31. R.V.S.Girija Kumari32. N.Mohan33. V.V.Subba Rao 1 of 634. P.S.Prasad35. B.Sarada Devi36. A.Manohara Rao37. D.Naresh38. G.Radhakrishna39. B.Ramasudarsana Rao40. M.V.Gopalakrishna41. V.G.Shyamsunder42. I.V.Prabhakar Rao43. P.V.R.Sankar44. T.S.L.Narasimha Rao45. A.Satyanarayana46. D.Satya Prasad47. S.V.N.S.Chalapathim Rao...
P.Dhanabackyam Vs The State of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-27-2025
M.SUNDAR.J., and (Order of the Court was made by M.SUNDAR, J.,) Captioned 'Writ Miscellaneous Petition' ['WMP' for the sake of brevity] has been filed to amend the prayer in the captioned writ petition.2. Mr.T.K.Saravanan, leaned Additional Government Pleader for the respondents is before us.3. Learned State counsel submits that he is not opposing the prayer in the captioned WMP.4. Therefore, taking into account the innocuous nature of the prayer and the fact that the amendment prayer is not opposed by the State counsel, we allow the captioned WMP5. Registry is directed to carry out necessary and consequential amendments. [M.S.J.,] [H.C.,J.,] gpa M.SUNDAR, J., and gpa...
T.Srinivasan, Vs G.Mini,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-27-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 27.06.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND T. Srinivasan ... Petitioner Vs. G. Mini, The Head Master, K.L.K. Government Higher Secondary School, Gummidipundi, Tiruvallur District 601 201. ... Respondent PRAYER: Contempt Petition is filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the respondent for his willful disobedience of theorder dated 08.11.2024 made in W.P.No.6757 of 2020 passed by thisCourt. For Petitioner : Ms. S. Esairani Narasimman For Respondent : Mrs. P. Raja Rajeswari, Government AdvocateORDERThis Contempt Petition has been filed complaining wilful disobedience of the order dated 08.11.2024 passed by this Court in W.P. No. 6757 of 2020 by the respondent.2. While disposing the said writ petition, this Court directed thepetitioner to give representation to the third respondent school requesting to appoint him as B.T. Assistant (History) on temporary or consolidated basis within a period of two wee...
R.Rajendran vs the Director of School
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-27-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 27.06.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR 1.R.Rajendran 2.K.Yogasundaram 3.P.Raman 4.S.Amudha 5.M.Uma 6.T.Kalpana 7.S.Ramani 8.V.Latha 9.G.Natarajan 10.P.Ilayaraja 11.R.Ilyaperumal 12.R.Dhandapani 13.M.Manickam 14.G.Saravanan 15.V.Ramachandran 16.P.Uma 17.K.Murugavel 18.D.Sriramamurali Krishnan19.V.Senthilmurugan 20.K.Ramesh 21.E.Venkatesan 22.S.Kamalakannan 23.R.Ponnurangan 24.M.Sankar 25.R.Suresh Anand 26.D.Sakthivel 27.A.Chitra 28.T.R.Kuppusamy 29.P.Kalaiselvi 30.S.Gandhimathi 31.M.Dhandapani 32.K.Ezhilan 33.P.Santhoshkumar 34.V.Elamparithi 35.S.Vadivel Murugan 36.G.Anandhi 37.P.Chennakrishnan 38.A.Francis Xavier 39.T.Thiruvengadam 40.A.Kumar 41.S.Arumugam 42.D.Kalidas 43.M.Harinarayanan44.M.Purushothaman 45.S.Murugan 46.V.Rammohan 47.P.Sureshkumar 48.P.Anbu 49.G.Ravi 50.S.Ponnammal 51.S.Venkatesan 52.P.Lakshmi 53.V.Kumarasamy 54.M.Vaidhehi 55.P.Jayaraman 56.H.Jasmine Shobana 57.N.Perumal 58.V.Suresh 59.E.Midhul...
V.Laksmanan Vs Dr. P.Senthilkumar, I.A.S., and 3 others
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-27-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 27.06.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND V. Lakshmanan ... Petitioner Vs. 1.Dr. P. Senthilkumar, I.A.S., The Principal Secretary to Government, Environment, Climate Change and Forests Department, Government of Tamil Nadu, Fort St. George, Chennai 600 009. 2.Srinivas R. Reddy, I.F.S., The Principal Chief Conservator of Forests, Head of Forest Force, Vellacherry Guindy Main Road, Guindy, Chennai 600 032. 3.Padma, I.F.S., The Conservator of Forests, Vellore Forest Region, Vellore, Vellore District.4.Gurusamy Dhabela, I.A.S., The District Forest Officer, Vellore Forest Division, Vellore, Vellore District. ... Respondents PRAYER: Contempt Petition is filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the respondents for disobedience of this Courtorder dated 13.09.2024 made in W.P. No. 21578 of 2022 and thus renderjustice. For Petitioner : Mr. M.R. Jothimanian For Respondents : Mr. S. Rajesh, Government AdvocateO...
Keerthana vs the Deputy Inspector General of Prisons,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-27-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 27.06.2025CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH and THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN Keerthana ... Petitioner Vs. Puzhal, Chennai 600 066 ... RespondentsPrayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records connected with impugned order dated 01.02.2025 in No.1392/Tha.Ku1/2024 passed by the second respondent and quash the same directing the respondents to grant Emergency leave for 60 days without escort to the detenue viz.Krishnaveni, W/o.Murugesan, ConvictNo.925, confined at Prison (Special) for Women, Puzhal, Chennai - 600066. For Petitioner : Mr.N.Vishnuvardhan For Respondents : Mr.E.Raj Thilak Additional Public ProsecutorORDERAND Since the convict prisoner has not completed one year of imprisonment after she was granted leave by this Court in W.P.No.23319 of 2024 dated 19.08.2024, for the period between 24.08...
Megala Chitravel vs R.Natesan (Died) 1. Jaya
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-27-2025
CMP.No.7523 of 2024 in CRP SR.No.23225 of 2024 This petition has been filed to condone the delay of 66 days in preferring the the present revision.2. The reasons for the delay assigned in the affidavit filed along withthe petition is that due to prolonged ill health of the petitioner and sudden demise of her husband she was not in a possession to follow the case. It is further stated that as the petitioner had shifted to Chennai and the notices in the suit have been serviced to her Ranipet Address, she was not aware of the suit proceedings. Therefore, the delay had occurred and the same is neither willful nor wanton. Hence, the present petition.3. Despite service of notice to the respondents and tracking sheet filed and notice served to the counsel on record appearing for the respondents in the Execution Court, none appeared for the respondents. vrc4. Considering the submissions of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and in order to give an opportunity to the petitioner to...
Parvathy and Another Vs No Respondent
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-27-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27.06.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU 1.Mrs.Parvathy 2.V.Yogesh PetitionersPRAYER: Original Petition filed under Part X of the Indian Succession Act and U/S 372 of the Indian Succession Act U/O.XXV, Rule 6 of O.S. Rules to issue a Succession Certificate in favour of the 1st petitioner with the power to collect the debts and securities with interest and dividends on negotiate and transfer the securities as specified in the Schedule hereto. For Petitioners : Mr.C.RajendranORDERThe petitioners seek Succession Certificate in favour of 1st petitioner in respect of the securities held by Late N.P.Thalasayanam who died intestate on 10.09.2005 and Late T.Srinivasan who is the eldest son Late N.P.Thalasayanam died intestate on 14.03.2011.2. The petitioners submit that the 1st deceased Late N.P.Thalasayanamwas married to one T.Susila Devi who predeceased him on 05.11.2004, the couple had begotten a daughter one Ms.Kalyani and two...
Kuppammal vs the Deputy Inspector General of Prisons
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-27-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 27.06.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH and THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN and W.M.P.No.12674 of 2025 Kuppammal .. Petitioner Vs. Puzhal, Chennai 600 066. .. RespondentsPrayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records in the order date on 30.12.2024 bearing No.610579/tha.ku.2/2024 passed by 2nd respondent and quashing the same, and directing the respondents to grant ordinary leave by without escort for the petitioner namely Kannan, S/o.Manickam, aged about 44 years, Convict Prisoner, Convict No.9596, Central Prison, Puzhal.For Petitioner : Ms.S.Nadhiya For Respondents : Mr.E.Raj Thilak Additional Public ProsecutorORDER(Order of the Court was made by M.S.RAMESH, J.) When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition and...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- Next ›
- Last »