Chennai Orders Court June 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
S.Sathiyamoorthy vs S.Gurumoorthy
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-27-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 27.06.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN S.Sathiyamoorthy ... Appellant Vs. 1.S.Gurumoorthy 2.S.Ramamoorthy 3.S.Kasi Viswanathan 4.S.Venkatraman @ S.V.Ramanan 5.Meenakshi Gopalarathinam 6.Rama Subramanian 7.Vanaja Venkatraman ... Respondents Prayer: Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, to set aside the judgment and decree dated 24.07.2008 made in A.S.No.16 of 2005 on the file of the District Judge, Thiruvannamalai in confirming the judgment and decree dated 28.02.2005 made in O.S.No.39/99 on the file of the Principal Sub Judge, Thiruvannamalai. For Appellant : Ms.G.Sumitra For Respondents : Mr.S.Ambigapathi for R1 Mr.T.R.Rajaraman for R4 & R7 Mr.S.Kaithamalai Kumaran for R2 Mr.M.V.Venkataseshan for R5JUDGMENTThis Second Appeal has been filed to set aside the judgment and decree dated 24.07.2008 made in A.S.No.16 of 2005 on the file of the District Judge, Thiruvannamalai in confirmi...
Jayaraj vs Mrs Saroja
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-27-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 27.06.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN Jayaraj (alias) Bhiman ... Appellant Vs. 1.Mrs.Saroja, Rep by her Power Agent, Mr.Mahendran 2.Arjunan 3.Kasi 4.Maheswaran 5.Devaraj 6.Deenadayalan 7.Narayanan 8.Mrs.Kanbu alias Gnanambal 9.Mrs.Kannamani 10.Kumar 11.Panneer 12.Palani 13.Mani 14.R.Murugesan 15.Mrs.R.B.Lalitha 16.Elumalai 17.Ravi 18.Mrs.Ponniammal 19.Munusamy 20.Palani21.Mrs.Devi 22.The Sub Registrar, Alandur, 23.The District Collector, Chengalpattu, 24.The Tahsildar, Ambattur Taluk, 25.Dharman 26.Yadhavaraman 27.Mrs.Chinthamani 28.Mrs.Sundari ... Respondents Prayer: Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, to set aside the judgment and decree passed in A.S.No.38 of 2007 of the Hon'ble Additional District Sessions Court, Fast Track Court No.1, Poonamallee dated 23.01.2009 is against the judgment and decree dated 14.06.2005 made in O.S.No.268 of 1996 on the file of the Subordinate ...
Regina Mary vs the Deputy Registrar of
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-27-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 27.06.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR and W.M.P.Nos.17964, 17965 & 17966 of 2004 1.Regina Mary 2.Aktharunisha ... Petitioners Vs.2.The State rep. by its Inspector of Police, Erode District. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Declaration declaring the First Information Report in Crime No.1 of 2004 dated 08.01.2004 pending on the file of the 2nd respondent is violative of the provisions of Section 81, 161, 162 and 164 of the Tamil Nadu Cooperative Societies Act, 1983 and violative of Entry 43 of List I, Entry 32 of List II, Entry I of the Constitution of India, as arbitrary and null and void and without jurisdiction. For Petitioners : Mr.N.ManokaranFor Respondents : Mr.Tamil Vendan Government Advocate.ORDERIt is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the relief sought in this writ petition does not survive any ...
R.Senthil Prabhu vs Tamilnadu Public Service Commission
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-27-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 27.06.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN Writ Petition No.3153 of 2025 and Writ Miscellaneous Petition Nos.3481 &3484 of 2025 R.Senthil Prabhu ... Petitioner ..Vs.. 1.Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission, Rep. by its Secretary, Frazer Bridge Road, VOC Nagar, Park Town, Chennai 600 003. 2.The Secretary to Government, Rural Development and Panchayat Raj Department, Fort St.George, Chennai -9. 3.The Tamil Nadu Corporation for Development of Women, Rep by its Managing Director, Mother Teresa Women's Complex-I Floor, Valluvar Kottam High Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai-600 034. (R2 & R3 impleaded vide order dated 27.06.2025 made in WMP No,12634/2025) 4.The Member Secretary, 5.The Principal Secretary, [RR4 and 5 are suo motu impleaded as per theorder of this Court dated 27.06.2025]... RespondentsPRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus ...
Tamil Nadu Higher Secondary Vs The State of Tamil Nadu,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-27-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 27.06.2025CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR Tamil Nadu Higher Secondary Postgraduate Teacher's Association, (Registration No.160/1980), Represented by is Legal Secretary, V.Manivasagan, No.159, Gengu Reddy Salai, Egmore, Chennai 600 008. ... Petitioner Vs. 1.State of Tamil Nadu, Rep by its Principal Secretary, School Education Department, Fort St.George, Chennai 600 009. 2.The Director of School Education, DPI Campus, College Road, Chennai 600 006. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of mandamus, directing the respondents herein to make the report of the Committee Constituted under G.O.Ms.No.57 dated 05.03.2013Page No. 1 of 5 constituted on 20.05.2014 and further take actions upon the recommendations of the Committee. For Petitioner : Ms.R.Pavithra for Mrs.Dakshayani Reddy For Respondents : Ms.Akila Rajendran Government AdvocateO...
G. Meenakshi Vs N Rajaram
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-27-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDated : 27.06.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE Ms. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA in CRP.No.1229 of 2019 C.Meenakshi W/o.N.Rajaram D/o.S.A.Ganesh No.13, 22nd Street, Nehru Colony Palavanthangal Chennai - 600 114. ... Petitioner Vs. N.Rajaram S/o.Nayagam No.13, 22nd Street, Nehru Colony Palavanthangal Chennai - 600 114. ... Respondent Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 151 of CPC praying to clarify the order in CRP.No.1229/2019 and CRP.No.2020/2020 . For Petitioner : Mr.R.Parthiban For Respondent : Dr.R.Sampath KumarORDERIt is rather unfortunate that the petitioner herein having engaged a counsel to represent her case in CRP.No.1229 of 2020 and the said counsel having made his representations before the Court seeking transfer of HMOP.No.544 of 2017 filed by the petitioner before the Sub Court, Tambaram to the file of this Court in order to enable the Court to record the Memorandum of Compromise dated 10.07.2019 entered between the parties, to dis...
R.Mariappan Vs K.R.Periya Karupan
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-27-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 27.06.2025CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR R.Mariappan ... Petitioner Vs. Virudhuagar District. ... Respondents Prayer : Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of 1 of 4 Courts Act, 1971 praying to show cause the respondents as to why they should not be proceeded with for their willful disobedience of orders of this Court dated 03.10.2016 in W.P.No.16681 of 2015. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Ramesh For Respondents : Mr.K.H.Ravikumar, Government AdvocateORDERThis Contempt petition has been filed for the violation of the orders passed by this Court in W.P.No.16681 of 2015, dated 03.10.2016.2. When the matter is taken up for consideration today, the learnedcounsel on either side submitted that the order, dated 03.10.2016 passed by this Court in W.P.No.16681 of 2015 has already been complied with by the respondents.3. Recording the above submission, this Contempt Petition is closed. No costs. Index : Yes/N...
A. R. Kannan, Vs Thiru. Rajesh Lakhoni, IAS.,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-27-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 27.06.2025CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR A.R.Kannan ... Petitioner Vs. Chepauk, Chennai 5. ... Respondent Prayer : Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 praying to punish the respondent for his willful and intentional disobedience to the order of this Court in W.P.No.22943 of 2015 dated 05.04.2022. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Muthappan For Respondent : Mr.Raman lal Additional Advocate General Assisted by Mr.Yogesh Kannadasan Special Government PleaderORDERThis Contempt petition has been filed for the violation of the orders passed by this Court in W.P.No.22943 of 2015, dated 05.04.2022. MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR,J., 1 of 2 vum2. When the matter is taken up for consideration today, it is broughtto the notice of this Court by Mr.Raman lal, learned Additional Advocate General as well as Mr.M.Muthappan, learned counsel for the petitioner that the order passed by this Court in W.P.No....
A. R. Kannan, Vs Thiru. Rajesh Lakhoni, IAS.,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-27-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 09-02-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY1. A. R. Kannan, S/o. M.Adhikesavan, Formerly Assistant, Revenue Divisional Office Tirunelveli. ..Petitioner Vs1. Thiru. Rajesh Lakhoni, IAS., (Additional Chief Secretary) Principal Secretary, Commissioner of Revenue Administration, Chepauk, Chennai - 5. ..Contemnor For Petitioner Mr.M.Muthappan For Contemnor Mr.Raman Lal AAG Asst.by Mr.Yogesh Kannadasan Spl.G.P.ORDERThis Contempt Petition has already been closed on 27.06.2025 and since it was wrongly listed today, no further order is required.2. Recording the same, Registry is directed to delete the same from the cause list. ari To 1.Thiru. Rajesh Lakhoni, IAS., (Additional Chief Secretary) Principal Secretary, Commissioner of Revenue Administration, Chepauk, Chennai - 5.D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J.ari...
The Commissioner vs K. Srinivasan
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-27-2025
CMP.No.5968 of 2025 and W.A.SR.No.27283 of 2025Dr.ANITA SUMANTH,J.andN.SENTHILKUMAR,J.(Order of the Court was made by Dr.ANITA SUMANTH.,J.) Mr.Karthik Jagannath, learned Government Advocate accepts notice for R2 to R4 and expresses no objection to the condonation of delay. R1 has been served and the description is printed in cause list.2. For the reasons set out in theaccompanying affidavit and there being no objection put forth by the respondents, the delay of 37 days in filing the Writ Appeal is condoned and this Miscellaneous Petition is ordered.3. Registry is directed to numberthe Writ Appeal, if it is otherwise in orderand list the same for admission.4. Mr.Karthik Jagannath, learnedGovernment Advocate, in anticipation of the appeal being numbered and listed for admission, seeks, and has been handed over a copy of the Writ Appeal papers from the Court bundle under acknowledgement. [A.S.M.,J] [N.S.,J] sl 27.06.2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »