Chennai Orders Court October 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Bala Sundar C Vs Jayanthi.M I.F.S.,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Oct-27-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-10-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE R.N.MANJULA AND REV.APLW NO. 149 OF 2024, REV.APLW NO. 109 OF 20251. Bala Sundar C No.166/1, Fourth Avenue, Sakthi Colony, Anna Nagar, Chennai-600040 Petitioner(s) Vs1. Jayanthi.M I.F.S., The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Pollution, control Board (TNPCB), No.76, Mount Road, Guindy, Chennai-600 032 Contemnor(s) REV.APLW No. 149 of 20241. Bala Sundar.C Son of Mr. Chandran, No. 166 / 1, Fourth Avenue, Sakthi Colony, Anna Nagar, Chennai - 600040. Appellant(s) Vs1. The Chairman,Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board (TNPCB), No. 76, Mount Road, Guindy, Chennai - 600 032. 2.The Director, Centre for Academic Courses, Anna University, Guindy, Chennai - 600025. 3.The Secretary, Department of HIgher Education, Department of Collegiate Education, Government of Tamil Nadu, Chennai - 600006. Respondent(s) REV.APLW No. 109 of 20251. The Chairman Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board (TNPCB), No.76, Mount Road, Guindy, Chemai -6...
S.Mariammal vs P.Subramani
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Oct-27-2025
CMP Nos.8603 & 8604 of 2023 in SA.No.4 of 2008 MR.MUMMINENISUDHEER KUMAR, J.Ms.Zeenath Begum, learned counsel already entered appearance for the respondents 2, 3, 5 to 9 and reported no objection to order both the petitions. 2.Considering the same and being satisfied with the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavits, these petitions are allowed. The proposed respondents 10 to 13 herein shall stand impleaded as the respondents 10 to 13 in the main second appeal, being the legal heirs of deceased R4. 3.Registry is directed to carry out necessary amendment.dn 27.10.2025 1/1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
C. Karthikeyan vs the Director
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Oct-27-2025
C.M.P.No.8691 of 2025 in W.A.SR.No.20217 of 2025R.SURESH KUMAR, J.ANDHEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR, J.[Order of the Court was made by R.SURESH KUMAR, J.] This civil miscellaneous petition has been filed to condone the delay of 34 days in filing the above writ appeal.2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.3. Mr..E.Veda Bagath Singh, learned Special Government Pleader takes notice for the respondents and he has no serious objection in allowing the petition.4. Having satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, this petition is ordered and the delay is condoned.5. Registry is directed to number the appeal and place the same for admission, if the papers are otherwise in order. [R.S.K., J.] [H.C., J.] 27.10.2025 KST https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
The Villupuram District Central Co-operative Bank Ltd Vs The Deputy Co ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Oct-27-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 27.10.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN and W.M.P.Nos.7797 & 7798 of 2022 The Villupuram District Central Co-operative Bank Ltd Represented by its General Manager, Mr.T.Prabakaran No.2, Hospital Road, Villupuram 605601. ... Petitioner Vs. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax National Faceless Assessment Centre, Room No.401, 2nd Floor, E-Ramp, Jawaharlal Nehru Stadium, Delhi 110003. ... Respondent Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records on the file of the respondent relating to the impugned order under Section 271(1)(c) dated 24.02.2022 for the Assessment Year 2010-2011 having DIN: ITBA/PNL/F/271(1)(c)/2021-22/1040059942(1) passed by the respondent and quash the same as illegal. For Petitioner : Mr.Varun Ranganathan For Mr.K.Ravi For Respondent : Mrs.S.Premalatha Senior Standing CounselORDERIn this Writ Petition, the petitioner ha...
K 2058 Saravanampatti Primary Agricultural Cooperative Credit Society ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Oct-27-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 27.10.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN W.P.Nos.7778 of 2022 and W.M.P.Nos.7800 & 7802 of 2022 K 2058 Saravanampatti Primary Agricultural Cooperative Credit Society Ltd, Rep. by its Secretary, P.Dhanalakshmi, F/47 No.102, Pillaiyar Kovil Street, Kalapatti Post, Coimbatore 641 048. ... Petitioner Vs. The Additional / Joint / Deputy / Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax / Income Tax Officer, Income Tax Department, National e-Assessment Centre, Delhi. ... Respondent Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the entire records relating to the impugned order passed by the respondent in its order No. ITBA/AST/S/143(3)/2021-22/1032379767(1), dated 30.03.2021 and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.C.Prakasam For Respondent : Dr.B.Ramaswamy Senior Standing CounselORDERIn this Writ Petition, the petitioner has challenged the impugned Orderdated 30.03.2...
K 2058 Saravanampatti Primary Agricultural Cooperative Credit Society ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Oct-27-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 27.10.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN W.P.Nos.7783 of 2022 and W.M.P.Nos.7806 & 7808 of 2022 K 2058 Saravanampatti Primary Agricultural Cooperative Credit Society Ltd, Rep. by its Secretary, P.Dhanalakshmi, F/47 No.102, Pillaiyar Kovil Street, Kalapatti Post, Coimbatore 641 048. ... Petitioner Vs. Income Tax Officer, Non-Corporate Ward 2(5), Coimbatore. ... Respondent Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the entire records relating to the impugned order passed by the respondent in its order No. NIL, dated 17.12.2019 and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.C.Prakasam For Respondent : Dr.B.Ramaswamy Senior Standing CounselORDERIn this Writ Petition, the petitioner has challenged the impugned Orderdated 17.12.2019 passed under Section 143(3) read with Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for the assessment year 2012-2013.2. It appears t...
T.Saraswathi Vs The Agriculture Production
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Oct-27-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-10-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K. SURENDER IN1. T.Saraswathi Petitioner(s) Vs1. The Agriculture Production Commissioner and Secretary to Government Agriculture Department, Secretariat, Chennai - 600009 2.The Managing Director Tanhoda, Chepauk, Chennai - 600005 3.The Joint Director of Horticulture, Horticulture House vijayanagaram, PB No. 74, Udhagamandalam - 643001 4.The Assistant Director Department of Horticulture Inputs (State Horticulture Farm, Janjanadu) Rose Garden, Udhagamandalam - Respondent(s) PRAYER To set aside the order of dismissal for default dated 11.3.2019 and restore the above WP No.15772 of 2018 on the file of this Honourable Court.1. T.Saraswathi Vs1. The Agriculture Production PRAYER: Directing the respondents to allow the petitioner to continue in service till the completion of 60 years. For Petitioner(s): M/s.V.Chandrasekaran For Respondent(s): M/s.R.L.Karthika Ga For R1 ,r3 And R4ORDERThe present petition ...
Karthick @ Kulla Karthick Vs The State Rep By, The Inspector of POlice
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Oct-27-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 27.10.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.RAJASEKARKarthick @ Kulla Karthick ... Petitioner Vs. The State Rep. By, The Inspector of Police, Crime No.1501 of 2024 ... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest in Crime No.1501 of 2024 on the file of the respondent police. For petitioner : Mr.G.Ezhilbalaji For Respondent : Mr.A.Gopinath, Government Advocate (Criminal Side)ORDERThe petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 02.12.2024, for the offence punishable under Sections 8(c) r/w 20(b)(ii)(c) of NDPS Act, in Crime No.1501 of 2024, registered on the file of the respondent, seeks bail.2. This Court had already dismissed the bail application of thepetitioner in Crl.O.P.No.919 of 2025, dated 14.02.2025, by stating the following reasons: 4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) a...
M/s. Atchaya Associates Groups Vs K.L. Suwithashree
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Oct-27-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27.10.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANANM/s.Atcharya Associates Groups Rep by its Managing Partner Mrs.Jaya Chandramohan, D.No.4/129 V.O.C. Nagar The Nilgiris-643 212. ... Petitioner v. Gudalur, The Nilrigis Tamil Nadu 643 212. ... Respondent PRAYER: This Contempt Petition has been filed Section 11 of the Contempts of Court Act, 1971, prayed to punish the respondent for willfully disobeying the order of this Court in W.P.No.916 of 2025 dated 10.01.2025. For Petitioner : Mr.Dinu Prashanth For Respondent : Mr.M.Suresh Kumar, AAG Assisted by D.T.Seenivasan Spl.GP.ORDEROn the previous occasion, I recorded the submission of the learned Additional Advocate General that a review petition had been presented to review the order passed by the Hon'ble Mr.Justice C.V.Karthikeyan in W.P.No.916 of 2025 dated 10.01.2025 which is the cause of action for the present contempt petition. In order to provide breathing time to the con...
L. Sundari vs Estate of S. Kempadevamma Deceased
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Oct-27-2025
in This petition has been filed to strike out the names of the respondents 3 to 8 in the above Second Appeal nos.181 & 182 of 2008.2.On perusal of the affidavit and from the averments made therein and submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner, it appears that the respondents 3 to 8 were the tenants of the lands which are subject matter of the suit when the original suit was filed and they are no more in possession of the same. The question of striking of the names, at the instance of the petitioner herein, who is one of the defendant, does not arise. However, as the petitioner / appellant is not intending to pursue the second appeal as against the respondents 3 to 8 and the same is accepted. The Second Appeal nos.181 & 182 of 2008 are dismissed as not pressed as against the respondents 3 to 8.dn 3.Registry is directed to carry out necessary amendment to the cause title in the main Second Appeal nos.181 & 182 of 2008. Dn 27.10.2025 in...