Chennai Orders Court October 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
National Girls Higher Secondary School, Vs The State of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Oct-27-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 27.10.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR National Girls Higher Secondary School, Rasipuram 637 408 Namakkal District Rep. By its Secretary, S.Lakshmi. .. Petitioner vs1.The State of Tamil Nadu Rep. By its Principal Secretary to Government Namakkal District, Namakkal. .. Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records relating to the impugned proceedings issued by the 3rd respondent in 5684/A1/2018 dated 30.11.2018 (served on the petitioner School on 04.12.2018) and to quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Nedunchezhiyan For Respondents : Mrs.V.Yamuna Devi Special Government PleaderORDERLearned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the case. He also made an endorsement to that effect.2. In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this writ petit...
Sigamani vs the State of Tamil Nadu Rep.by the Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Oct-27-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27.10.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR CRL.M.P.Nos.427 & 397 of 2025 in Sigamani Petitioner in both petitions Vs Respondents in Crl.M.P.No.427 of 20252. Ramesh Babu2. K.Balaji3. S.Thulasi Doss Respondents in Crl.M.P.No.397 of 2025COMMON PRAYER: These petitions have filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C./528 of BNSS, seeking to permit the petitioners to intervene in Crl.O.P.Nos.47 & 142 of 2025. K.RAJASEKAR J. kmm For Petitioners : Mr.D.Lakshmipathy For Respondent : Mr.S.Udayakumar Government Advocate (Crl.side)COMMON ORDEROrdered as prayed for. 27.10.2025 kmm CRL.M.P.Nos.397 & 427 of 2025 in...
Mrs.P.Seethalakshmi vs Mrs.a.Kausalya
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Oct-27-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-10-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE R.N.MANJULA AND OA NO. 1237 OF 2008,OA NO. 1238 OF 20081. Mrs.P.Seethalakshmi2.Mrs.N.S.Parimalam 3.Mrs.P.A.Kanchanamala No.52/2 Ramasami Street Mannady Chennai 1 4.Mr M.Bhavani Shankar No.14/1 Paramasiva Chetty Street Park Town Chennai 35. N.P.Vinayaka Sudaram S/o.Late.N.V.Plani, Hindu, Aged About 63 years, Residing at No.53(125), Rasappa Chetty Street, Park Town, Chennai-6000036. N.P.Karthikeyan S/o.Late.N.V.Palani, Hindu, Aged About 61 years, Residing at. No.61 A, Sri Durga Apartments, 6th Cross Street, New Colony Chrompet, Chennai-7. K.Sathya BamaW/o.Late.K.M.Krishnamurthy, Hindu Aged about 56 years, Residing at No.22/2, Crescent Road, Shenoy Nagar, Ch-30 (Plaintiffs 5 to 7 are brought on record as Legal Heirs of the Deceased 1st Plaintiff as per order datedorder dated 16/06/2023)Plaintiff(s) Vs1. Mrs.A.Kausalya 2.Mr. A.Jayagopal 3.Mrs.U.Jayashree 4.Mrs. C.Jayamalini 5.Mr.V.G.Venkatachalam Plot ...
R.Manikandan Vs The State of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Oct-27-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 27.10.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR and W.M.P.Nos.23168, 1927, 1930 and 1935 of 2019 R.Manikandan .. Petitioner vs 1.The State of Tamil Nadu Rep by its Principal Secretary to Government, Chennai 600 025. Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records pertaining to the G.O.(D).No.77 Higher Education (H1) Department dated27.05.2020 issued by the 1st respondent and the consequent proceedings No.54732/B3/2016, dated 17.07.2020 issued by the 4th respondent and quash the same and consequently post the petitioner in his Parent Department, Viz., 3rd respondent University. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Kabilesh for Mr.Richardson Wilson For Respondents : Mr.C.Gauthamaraj for R1 and R2 Government Advocate Mr.S.Nambi Arooran for R3 for M/s.Ajmal AssociatesORDERMr.M.Kabilesh, learned counsel representing Mr.Richardson ...
A.Krishnasamy Udayar vs Veerappa Udayar
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Oct-27-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-10-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR & MP No.1 of 20091. A.Krishnasamy Udayar, S/o.Arunachala Udayar, Fram Shed, Devarayapuram Post, Namakkal Tk and District. 2.A.Devaraj Udayar, S/o.Arunachala Udayar, Fram Shed, Appellant(s) Vs1. Veerappa Udayar,S/o.Vellamuthu Udayar, Farm Shed, 2.Arunachala Udayar, S/o.Nallamuthu Udayar, Farm Shed, 3.N.Murugesan @Arumugam S/o.Nallamuthu Udayar, Farm Shed, Respondent(s)PRAYER This Second Appeal has been filed as against the judgment and decree passed in A.S.No.268 of 2003 on the file of Additional District Judge(FTC), Namakkal dated 21.08.2007 confirming the judgment and decree dated 13.03.2003 in O.S.No.198 of 2000 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Namakkal. For Appellant(s): M/s.S.Saravana Kumar for Mr.M.Sudhakar For Respondent(s): Mr.A.Deepak for M/s.Kandhan Duraisami for R2 & 3ORDERWhen the matter was taken up for consideration before this Court on 07.10.20...
Muthusami vs Sivapakkiyam
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Oct-27-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 27.10.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR and C.M.P.No.1 of 20081. Muthusami2. Kullammal (Died)3. Chinnaponnu4. Dhanapakkiam5. Sinnappan ... Appellant(s) [Appellants 4 & 5 and Respondents 5 & 6 brought on record as LRs of the deceased 2nd appellant vide order dated 03.02.2020 in CMP Nos.1709 & 1713 of 2020] Vs.1. Sivapakkiyam (Died)2. Maruthamuthu3. Ramalingam4. Marimuthu (Died)5. Ponnusami6. Thangavel7. Koothan8. Amirtham9. Samiappan10. Vellayan11. Vellayammal [R7 to R11 brought on record as LRs of the deceased R4 vide courtorder dated 22.04.2021 made in CMP Nos.2032, 2034 & 2036 of 2020]12. Sadaiayan13. Thangaraji14. Govindan15. Valliammal ... Respondent(s) [R12 to R15 brought on record as LRs of the deceased R1 videorder dated 07.03.2023 made in CMP Nos.1884, 1888 & 1892 of 2020]Prayer: Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C to set aside the Judgment and Decree dated 31.01.2008 made in A.S.N...
Sujay Gopal Rao vs Government of India
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Oct-27-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 27.10.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN 1.Sujay Gopal Rao, 2.Chand Kumar L 3.Sampath Kumar C.K . Petitioners Vs 1.Government of India, rep. by its Under Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Banking Division, Jeevan Deep, III Floor, Parliament Street, New Delhi. 2.The Reserve Bank of India, rep. by its Executive Director, New Central Office Building, Shahid Bhagar Singh Rd, Fort, Mumbai, Maharashtra 400 001.3.Indian Overseas Bank, rep. by its Managing Director & Chief Executive Officer, Central Office, Chennai 600 002. 4.The General Manager, Human Resource Management Department, Indian Overseas Bank, Central Office, Chennai 600 002. 5.The Chief Manager, Personnel Administration Department, Indian Overseas Bank, Central Office, Retirees Grievances Cell, Chennai 600 002. .. Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the thir...
Nagammal vs Kamalam(Died) 1.M.Ramamurthy
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Oct-27-2025
in The learned counsel for the respondents reported no objection toorder this petition, which has been filed to bring on record the legalrepresentatives of the deceased 4th appellant Moorthy, 2.The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that one of the legal heirs of the 4th appellant is already on record as the appellant no.1 and the proposed petitioners 5 & 6, are the wife and daughter of the3. In view of the same, this petition is ordered. The first appellanthas been recognised as one of the legal heirs of the deceased 4 th appellant and the proposed petitioners 5 and 6 herein, shall stand impleaded as the appellants 6 & 7 in the main second appeal being the other legal heirs of the 4.Registry is directed to carry out necessary amendment. Dn dn in...
K.Gunasekar vs R.Gunasundari
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Oct-27-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-10-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE A.D.MARIA CLETE 1.K.Gunasekar 2.G.Selvi 3.K.Santhanammal ...Appellants Vs. 1.R.Gunasundari 2.K.Gunavathi 3.M.Valarmathi ...Respondents Prayer: This Appeal Suit is filed under Section 96 of CPC., r/w Order 41 Rule 1 of C.P.C, 1908, praying to set aside the decree and judgment dated 18.12.2019 in OS.No.15 of 2018 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, (Fast Track Judge), Villupuram and thus render justice. For Appellants : No appearance For Respondents : Mr.K.Harishankar for R2 to R4 R1- Died DR.JUSTICE A.D.MARIA CLETE.J., dnaORDERWhen the matter was taken up for hearing on 26.09.2025, there was no representation for the appellants and hence, the matter was adjourned under the caption for dismissal 27.10.2025.2. Even today (27.10.2025) there is no representation for the appellantseither in person or through their counsel. Hence, this Appeal Suit is dismissed for non-prosecution. Consequentl...
Munirathinam Nagabushnam Vs The Assessment Unit
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Oct-27-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 27.10.2025CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN and Munirathinam Nagabushnam ... Petitioner Vs.Officers Line, Vellore 632 001. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to quash the impugned notice issued under Section 148 of the Act in non-faceless manner containing DIN & Notice No:ITBA/AST/S/148_1/2022-23/1050913587 (1) dated 17.03.2023 issued by the 2nd Respondent; the impugned order passed under Section 148A(d) of the Act in DIN & Notice No:ITBA/AST/F/148A/2022-Page No. 1 of 4 intimation dated 17.08.2023 in DIN & Letter No.ITBA/AST/S/61/2023- 15.01.2024 in DIN & Letter No.ITBA/AST/S/61/2023-24/1059739576 (1) issued by the 1st Respondent for Assessment Year 2016-17. For Petitioner : Mr.SP Chidambaram For Respondents : Dr.B.Ramaswamy Senior Standing CounselORDERThe learned counsel for the Petitioner seeks permiss...
- ‹ Prev
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- Next ›
- Last »