Chennai Orders Court October 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Union of India vs Government of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Oct-29-2025
2025:MHC:2993IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29.10.2025CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SAKTHIVEL and W.M.P.No.18340 of 2023 1.Union of India, Rep. by its General Manager, Southern Railway, Chennai 600 003. 2.The Senior Divisional Personnel Officer/TPJ, Tiruchirappalli Division, Southern Railway, Tiruchirappalli 620 020. ...Petitioners Vs. 1.Government of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary/Chairman, Scrutiny Committee III, Adi Dravidar & Tribal Welfare Department, Namakkal Kavignar Maaligai, Secretariat, Chennai 600 009. 2.The District Collector, Villupuram Division, 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Villupuram District, 4.L.Kuppulingam ...RespondentsPrayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the impugned proceedings of the 1 st respondent in proceedings No.24975/CV-6/2018-5 dated 31.03.2022 and quash the ...
T. Carounagaran, Vs Thiru. K. Muralidharan,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Oct-29-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 29.10.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN T.Carounagaran ... Petitioner Vs. K.Muralidharan Managing Director, The Pondicherry Tourism Development, Corporation Ltd., No.40, Goubert Avnue, Puducherry 605 001. ... Respondent Prayer:- Contempt petition has been filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, praying to punish the respondent herein for disobeying the order passed by this Court dated 14.09.2023 in W.P.No.12868 of 2005. For Petitioner : Mr.V.Subramani For Respondent : Mr.R.Sreedhar Additional Government Pleader (Pondy)ORDERThis Contempt Petition has been filed to punish the respondents for non compliance of the order dated 14.09.2023 passed by this Court in W.P.No.12868 of 2005, thereby directing the respondent to re-designate the petitioner as Cook/Commis Grade-I with effect from 01.01.2000 with all consequential seniority, arrears and all other benefits.2. The learned Additional Government Plea...
K.Packiasamy vs Government of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Oct-29-2025
W.M.P.Nos.12443,12439, 16606 & 43921 of 2025 in WP.Nos.11034, 11031, 14713 & 39133 of 2025 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J., These petitions are ordered on payment of separate Court fees by the petitioners. 29.10.2025 (2/2) shr https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
M/s.Radha Lime Stone Mines Vs The Director of Geology and Mininig
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Oct-29-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 29.10.2025CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. DHANDAPANI and W.M.P.No.11051 of 2022 M/s.Radha Lime Stone Mines, Rep. by its Managing Partner, R.Kalpana, W/o.K.M.Ramakrishnan, No.107, State Bank Colony, Phase III, Salem 636 004. ... Petitioner Vs. Chennai 600 032. ... Respondent Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the impugned order dated 01.04.2022 made in R.C.No.1536/MM5/2015 passed by the respondent quash the same, consequently direct the respondent to process the petitioner's mining application dated 16.06.2008. For Petitioner : Mr.K.R.Krishnan For Respondent : Mr.Stalin Abimanyu Additional Government Pleader *****ORDERPage No.1 of 4Though the petitioner has filed this Writ Petition challenging the impugned order dated 01.04.2022 made in R.C.No.1536/MM5/2015 passed by the respondent, and consequential seeking a...
Sandhiammal Vs N.PERUMAL
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Oct-29-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29-10-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE A.D.MARIA CLETE in1. Sandhiammal2. Sakthivel3. Saratha4. Periyakkal5. Kaliammal ... Petitioners Vs.1. N.Perumal2. Murugammal3. Chinnasamy4. Mariappan5. Perumal6. Selvi7. Eswari8. Madammal ... RespondentsPRAYER: Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed under Order 1 Rule 10 (2) of Civil Procedure Code and under Section 151 of Civil Procedure Code to implead the petitioners as respondents 8 to 12 in the above S.A.No.236 of 2014. For Petitioners : Mr.R.Gunasekaran For Respondents : Mr.Uma Shankar for Mr.M.Selvam for R1 Mr.V.R.Annagandhi for R2 to R7 Served no appearance for R8ORDERWhen the matter was taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission of this Court to withdraw this civil miscellaneous petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect in the Court bundle.2. Recording the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitionerand also in view of the endorsem...
N.Natarajan and another Vs Mr.Senthil,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Oct-29-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29.10.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR1. M.Natarajan, S/o.T.Murugesa Mudaliar2. N.Gowri, W/o.M.Natarajan ... Petitioners Vs. Mr.Senthil, Tashildhar, Pallavaram ... RespondentContempt Petition filed u/s.11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, praying to punish the respondent for the disobedience of the orders in W.P.No.30503 of 2024 dated 17.10.2024. For Petitioners : Mr.N.Suresh For Respondent : Mr.G.Velu Additional Government Pleader *****S.SOUNTHAR, J.mpORDERToday, when the contempt petition is taken up for hearing, the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondent would submit that pursuant to the direction issued by this Court in the main writ petition, the representation of the petitioners has been considered and patta has been issued in their name in patta No.10560 and he has also produced the same before this Court.2. Recording the same, this contempt petition is closed. 29.10.2025 Neutral Citation...
Sandhiammal Vs N. PERUMAL
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Oct-29-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29-10-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE A.D.MARIA CLETE in1. Sandhiammal2. Sakthivel3. Saratha4. Periyakkal5. Kaliammal ... Petitioners Vs.1. N.Perumal2. Chinnasamy3. Murugammal4. Chinnasamy5. Mariappan6. Perumal7. Selvi8. Eswari9. Madammal ... RespondentsPRAYER: Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed under Order 1 Rule 10 (2) of Civil Procedure Code and under Section 151 of Civil Procedure Code to implead the petitioners as respondents 8 to 12 in the above S.A.No.235 of 2014. For Petitioners : Mr.R.Gunasekaran For Respondents : Mr.Uma Shankar for Mr.M.Selvam for R1 & R2 Mr.V.R.Annagandhi for R3 to R8 Served no appearance for R9ORDERWhen the matter was taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission of this Court to withdraw this civil miscellaneous petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect in the Court bundle.2. Recording the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitionerand also i...
The State of Tamil Nadu Vs N.Fathima Barvin
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Oct-29-2025
C.M.P.No.9495 of 2025 in W.A.SR.No.46297 of 2025R. SURESH KUMAR, J.ANDHEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR, J.This miscellaneous petition has been filed to dispense with the production of the certified copy of theorder dated 04.04.2024 made inW.p.No.2982 of 2022. Perusing the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this petition and being satisfied with the same, this miscellaneous petition is ordered on condition that the certified copy of theorder shall be produced as and when it ismade ready. (R.S.K., J) (H.C., J) 29.10.2025 (drm) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
P. Gengasalam, M/63 vs Government of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Oct-29-2025
W.M.P.Nos.13957, 13952, 16599 & 13969 of 2025 in WP.Nos.12358, 12356, 14708 & 12367 of 2025 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J., These petitions are ordered on payment of separate Court fees by the petitioners. 29.10.2025 (2/2) shr https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
A.George Mani vs Government of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Oct-29-2025
W.M.P.No.13976 of 2025 in WP.No.12376 of 2025 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J., This petition is ordered on payment of separate Court fees by the petitioners. 29.10.2025 (2/2) shr https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- Next ›
- Last »