Chennai Orders Court October 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Perumal Vs Ramu
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Oct-25-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 25/10/2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.SAKTHIVEL AND C.M.P.NO.9197 OF 2022 Perumal, S/o.Raman, Chettipatti, Govindapaadi Post, Kaveripuram Village, Mettur Taluk, Salem District. ... Petitioner/Respondent/ Plaintiff Vs. Ramu, S/o.Muthu Gounder, D.No.2/1-159, Ward 2, Moolakaidai Street, Veerakkalpudur Village, Mettur Taluk, Salem District. ... Respondent/Petitioner/ Defendant PRAYER : Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 115 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, to set aside the Fair and Decreetal Order dated October 08, 2021 in I.A.No.01 of 2019 in O.S.No.135 of 2016 on the file of Sub Court, Mettur. Page No.1 of 4 For Petitioner : Mr.R.VivekanandanORDERMr.R.Vivekanandan, learned counsel appearing for the Revision Petitioner submits that the sole respondent has died in the year 2022 and the matter was also settled between the parties. He also made an endorsement to that effect. 2.The scanned version of the endorsement is reproduce...
Muthupandi vs M.Prema
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Oct-24-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 24.10.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. SAKTHIVEL and C.M.P.Nos.10041 and 10043 of 20231.Muthu Pandi 2.A.Veerapathiran 3.V.Arunasundari 4.V. Velu ... Petitioners Vs. M. Prema ... Respondent Prayer: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India praying to allow this revision and strike off the Complaint in D.V.C.No.7 of 2023 on the file of the learned District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate, Karimangalam, Dharmapuri. For Petitioners : Mr. G. Kavin Selvakumar for Mr.M. Jaisingh For Respondent : Mr.S.Deenathayalan for Mr.S.SasikumarORDERThe Civil Revision Petition has been filed praying to allow this revision by striking off the Complaint in D.V.C.No.7 of 2023 on the file of 'the District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate Court, Karimangalam, Dharmapuri' (hereinafter referred as the 'Trial Court').2.The revision petitioners herein are the respondent Nos.1 to 4 in the D.V.C.No.7 of ...
Arulmigu Paleswarar Thirukoil Vs The District Collector
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Oct-24-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 24-10-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.B. BALAJI and WMP.No.4476 of 2021 Arulmigu Paleswarar Thirukoil Rep. by its Executive Officer, Paleswaran Kandigai, Gummidipoondi Taluk, Thiruvallur District. Petitioner Vs1. The District CollectorTiruvallur District, Tiruvallur 602 001. 2.The Tahsildar Gummidipoondi Taluk, 3.The Block Development Officer, 4.The President, New Gummidipoondi Panchayat, 5.The Inspector F-2 SIPCOT, Gummidipoondi Police Station, Tiruvallur District. 6.L.Sukumaran, New Gummidipoondi, Village, RespondentsPRAYER Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of Mandamus, directing respondents 1 to 3 to stop the construction on the land measuring 371 Sq.Metres, situate in Survey No.23/3, Paleswaran Kandigai, Gummidipoondi Taluk, Tiruvallur District and to pull down the construction already put up by the 4th and 6th respondent as per the representation dated 05.02.2021.Fo...
M.Gurumurthy, vs the Secretary to Government
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Oct-24-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 24-10-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K. SURENDER WP Nos.21640 of 2012 & 20823 of 2013 and M.P.Nos 1 of 2012 & 1 of 20131. M.Gurumurthy2. Anbumani3. K.Balaiah4. A.Venkatachalam ... Petitioners in both WPs'Vs. Thanjavur. ... Respondents in both Wps' Prayer in W.P.No.21640 of 2012: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 st records of the 1 respondent in connection with the impugned order passed by him in GO D No.50 Rural Development & Panchayat Raj (C7) Dept dated 26.08.11 and quash the same in so far as granting monetary benefits from the date of the Government order and further direction the respondents to regularise the service of the petitioner in the cadre of Office Assistant from the date of initial appointment and grant them all consequential service and monetary benefits. Prayer in W.P.No.20823 of 2013: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226records of the respondents 1,3, & 4 in connection ...
Srimathi vs the Superintendent of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Oct-24-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 24.10.2025CoramTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR and THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.JOTHIRAMAN Srimathi D/o.Baskaran .. Petitioner Vs. Cr.No.15 of 2025 3.S.Nathiya 4.Suresh .. Respondents (Amended as per order dated 03.03.2025 in Crl.M.P.No.4030 of 2025 in HCP.No.271 of 2025) Habeas Corpus Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus to issue a direction to the respondents to produce the victim girl namely Swathi, D/o.Suresh, aged about 19 years, before this Court and set her at liberty. For Petitioner : Mr.C.B.Murali Krishnan For Respondents : Mr.A.Damodaran for R1 & R2 Additional Public Prosecutor Mr.P.Vimal for R3 and R4ORDER[Order of the Court was made by N.SATHISH KUMAR, J] This petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondents to produce the victim girl namely Swathi, D/o.Suresh, aged about 19 years, before this Court and set her at liberty.2. When the...
L R Ravi Prasad vs B Chandramohan
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Oct-24-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 24.10.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN L.R.Ravi Prasad .. Petitioner Vs 1.Mr.B.Chandramohan I.A.S. Commissioner Chennai 600 003 2.Mr.G.Veerappan Zonal Officer, Zone-10 No.117/64, N.S.K.Road Kodambakkam, Chennai 600 024 3.Mr.Ramesh Kumar Assistant Executive Engineer Office of 127th Ward Iyyappa Nagar, 2nd Main Road Chinmaya Nagar, Chennai 600 0924.Mr.K.Malairajan Councilor-Ward No.127 Corporation of Chennai .. Respondents Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to punish the respondents for violation of the order passed by this Court in M.P.No.1 of 2014 in W.P.No.25852 of 2014 dated 22.09.2014. For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondents : Mr.D.B.R.Prabu Standing CounselORDERThe contempt has been initiated alleging violation of the interim order of status quo granted by this Court on 22.09.2014.2. By an order dated 23.04.2021, this Court had directed the listing of thewrit pet...
N.Murugan vs the Managing Director
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Oct-24-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 24.10.2025CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN and W.M.P.Nos.4394 & 4395 of 2024 N.Murugan ... Petitioner Vs.1. The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Ltd., th 4 Floor, Thalamuthu Nadarasan Maligai, Egmore, Chennai 8.2. The District Manager, Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Ltd., Kancheepuram (North) Kancheepuram District.3. G.Ramamoorthy ... RespondentsPrayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of 2 nd respondent made in Na.Ka.No.787/A3/2023 dated 22.01.2024 and quash the same and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to issue license in favour of the petitioner to run the bar attached to TASMAC wine shop No.4086, Page No. 1 of 5 situated at No.1/31, Muthu Mariamman Koil Street, Manimangalam Village, Chengalpet. For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondents : Mr.K.Balakrishnan Government...
The Managing Director vs Minor Udayakumar
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Oct-24-2025
C.M.P.No.10798 of 2025 in C.M.A.SR.No. 21825 of 2024R.KALAIMATHI, J.This petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 113 days in filing the appeal. 2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the 1st respondent. 3.Learned counsel for the 1st respondent does not have any serious objection in allowing this petition. 4.Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this petition and on considering the no objection expressed by the learned counsel for the 1st respondent, this Civil Miscellaneous Petition is ordered and the delay of 113 days in filing the above appeal is hereby condoned. 24.10.2025 msr Note: Registry is directed to number the appeal, if it is, otherwise in order. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
M. Manoharan vs P. Balamurugan
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Oct-24-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 24.10.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE A.D. MARIA CLETE A.S.No.314 of 2018 and C.M.P.No.7771 of 2018 M. Manoharan s/o. Ponmudi chettia @ murugesan, Old.No.9/3, New.No.9/d3, Kamatchiamman kovil opp. Nehru street, Udumalpet. ...Appellant Vs. 1.P. Balamurugan s/o. V. Palanisamy, 142f/1, keerthik illam, Elayamuthur pirivu, Dhali road, udumalpet. M.kamalam (died)2. M. Rajendran, S/o. Ponmudi chettiar @ murugesan, 8/c85, r.r. Comples, 1 st floor, Kandiyapillai st, opp. Devi talkies, Srirangam, trichy. 3.P. Baskaran S/o. Ponmudi chettiar @ murugesan, O.no.3/460, n.no.5/312, Madha layour, udumalpet. 4.R. Shanthi w/o. Rajasekar, 52, p.v.kovil st, 5.M/s.Central Bank of india rep.by its senion manager, Dhali road,6.M.krithika W/o. S. Mohanasenthil, Periakulam vayal thottam, Vadaputhanam, sundakampalayam, 7.V.murugavel S/o.Velligiriappan, Sundakampalayam, Bodipatti po, 8.R.Vanitha W/o. Rajarajan, 5/312, Matha layout, 9.M.Janaki D/o. Manokaran, 5/...
S.Mahesh vs Vijayalakshmi
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Oct-24-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 24-10-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA S.Mahesh Petitioner(s) Vs1. Vijayalakshmi2.Minor Nikisha Bala Represented by mother, Guardian and next friend Vijayalakshmi, the 1st respondent, Having address at No.5/162, Keezha Street, Sri Vanjiyam Village, Nannilam Taluk, Thiruvarur District. Respondent(s) PRAYER Criminal Original Petition filed under section 528 of BNSS to call for the records and set aside the order in Crl.M.P.No.6519/2023 in M.C.No.11 of 2019, on the file of the Learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvarur. For Petitioner(s): Mr.S.M.MuralidharanORDERLearned Counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect in the case bundle.2. Therefore, the criminal original petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. sli Index:Yes/NoSpeaking/Non-speaking orderInternet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA J. sli...
- ‹ Prev
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- Next ›
- Last »