Chennai Orders Court October 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
K Dhinakaran vs Directorate General of Goods and Service Tax Intellige ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Oct-24-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 24.10.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR and Crl.MP.5590 od 2025 K.Dhinakaran ... Petitioner Vs. Through its Director, Coimbatore Regional Unit, Madurai 654. ... Respondent (Crime No.Not known of 2025) For Petitioner : Mr.P.K.Harinath Babu For Intervenor : Mr.P.Muthukumarasamy For Respondent : Mr.P.Vishnu Special Public ProsecutorORDERThe learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition and has also made an endorsement to that effect.K.RAJASEKAR, J.Vv2. In view of the submission and the endorsement made by the learnedcounsel for the petitioners, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 24.10.2025 Vv To Coimbatore Regional Unit, Madurai 654. 3.The Public Prosecutor High Court of Madras, Chennai 600 104....
M/s Ramasamy Gounder and Co Vs The Commissioner
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Oct-24-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 24.10.2025CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN and W.M.P.Nos.9988 and 13905 of 2025 W.P.No.8891 of 2025 M/s.Ramasamy Gounder and Co. Represented by its Managing Partner R. Balasubramaniam ... Petitioner Vs.1. The Commissioner, 894, Brough Road, Erode - 638 001.2. The Assistant Commissioner,894, Brough Road, Erode 638 001. ... Respondents W.P.No.12315 of 2025 G. Mohanakrishnan ... Petitioner Vs. The Corporation Commissioner, 894, Brough Road, Erode 638 001. ... RespondentPrayer in W.P.No.8891 of 2025: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the Notice dated 13.11.2024 issued by the 2nd Respondent in Na.Ka.No.A1/366/2024, quash the same and consequential Special Notice dated 27.11.2024 issued by the 1st Respondent in Assessment No.056/019/901706 and Old Assessment No.056/3213766, quash the same.Prayer in W.P.No.12315 of 2025: Writ Petition is filed u...
S.N.Vijayan vs M.Ravi Anand
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Oct-24-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 24.10.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE Dr.JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN in Rev.Aplw SR.No.44665 of 2025 W.P.No.33047 of 2023 W.M.P.No.14607 of 2025: 1.S.N.Vijayan S/o S.P.Nagalinga Sengunthar No.5/2, Murugappa Mudali Street, Ranipet District 632 512. 2.T.M.Girivasan, S/o V.Manickavasaga Sengunthar, No.29, Kil Godown Street, Ranipet District 632 512. ..Petitioners/Petitioner/3rd Parties/versus/1.M.Ravi Anand S/o Munusamy Mudaliar No.9/1, Sababathy Mudaliar Street, Timiri, Arcot Taluk, Ranipet District. ..Respondent/Respondent/Petitioner2.The Superintendent of Police, Ranipet District Bharathi Nagar, Ranipet. 3.The Inspector of Police, Timiri Police Station, 4.Narayanamurthy, S/o Kuppusamy, No.36A, Duraisamy Street, 5.N.N.A.Ekambaram, S/o Arunachalam, No.26, Pillaiyar Koil Street, Sanjeevirayanpet, 6.T.A.Shanmugam, S/o Annamalai, No.248, Nehru Bazaar, Ranipet District. ..Respondents/Respondents/1 to 5 Respondents This petition has been filed under Article...
K.Sakthivel vs the Accountant General of Tamilnadu
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Oct-24-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 24.10.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI K.Sakthivel ... Petitioner Vs.SALEM DISTRICT. ... Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the impugned order dated 07.03.2023 made in Oo.Mu.981/2023/E passed by the third respondent, quash the same and consequently direct the third respondent to issue a certificate to correct the name of my wife as 'S.Kasthuri' instead 'S.Krishnavani' in the nominee columnof the Service Register to process family pension proposal. For Petitioner : Mr.N.Manoharan For Respondents : Ms.G.Vardini Karthik for R1 Ms.S.Anitha for R2 to R4 Special Government PleaderORDERThis writ petition has been filed seeking issuance of Writ ofCertiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the orderdated 07.03.2023 made in Oo.Mu.981/2023/E passed by the third respondent, ...
V. Divijendran vs the Management of Mrf Limited
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Oct-24-2025
WA NO. 468 of 2024IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 24-10-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE M.S. RAMESH AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SAKTHIVEL CMP NO. 9693 OF 2025 and CMP NO. 9665 OF 2025 in WA NO. 471 OF 2024, WA NO. 481 OF 2024 and WA NO. 468 of 2024, WA NO. 475 OF 2024, CMP NO. 3211 OF 2024, CMP NO. 3192 OF 2024, CMP NO. 3195 OF 2024, CMP NO. 3201 OF 2024, CMP NO. 3196 OF 2024, CMP NO. 3168 OF 2024, CMP NO. 3172 OF 2024, CMP NO. 3156 OF 2024, CMP NO. 3167 OF 2024, CMP NO. 3174 OF 2024, WA NO. 470 OF 2024, WA NO. 477 OF 2024, CMP NO. 9693 of 2025 V. Divijendran S/o. Rama Naidu, Gajalakshmipuram, Suriyanayagaram Post, Tirutani Taluk Vs The Management Of MRF Limited Rep. by its General Manager, Ichiputhur, Arakkonam - 003. and another CMP NO. 9665 of 2025 K. Jaganathan S/o. Kuppa Reddy, Vadamampakkam Village and Post, Arakkonam. Vs The Management of M/S. MRF LTD Rep. by its General Manager, Ichiputhur, Arokkanam 631003. and another For Appellant(s): Ms.C.S.Monica in ...
Saifullah Vs The State rep by, The Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Oct-24-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 24-10-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA1. Saifullah S/o.Ataullah, No.8-10/99-100, S1 D Block, Community Hall Street, 2nd Floor, MMDA Colony, Arumbakkam, Chennai-600 106. Petitioner(s) Vs1. The State rep by, The Inspector ofPolice, Cr.No.8/2024. 2.A.Gnanapaul S/o.Antonydasan Nadar (Late), AFL Complex, Tannery Street, B.P.Agraharam, Erode-638 005. Respondent(s) PRAYER To call for the records and quash the First Information Report in Cr.No.8/2024 on the file of Sub-Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Erode-638 001. For Petitioner(s): Mr.K.R.Ramesh Kumar M.Prem Kumar For Respondent(s): Mr.K.M.D.Muhilan, Addl.Public Prosecutor For R1 Mr.R.Chandrasudan For R2ORDERThis Crl.O.P., has been filed praying to call for the records and quash the First Information Report in Cr.No.8/2024 on the file of Sub-Inspector of Police,2. The 2nd respondent-de facto complainant has given a complaint to the1st respondent police statin...
Ravi vs the Sub Registrar
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Oct-24-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 24.10.2025CoramTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY and WMP.No.17501 of 2025 Ravi ... Petitioner Vs. ...RespondentPrayer:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records pertaining to impugned order of passed by the respondent in Check Slip RFL/Pallakkode/201/2024 dated 13.08.2024, thereby refusing to register the document and quash the same as illegal, incompetent and without jurisdiction and further direct the respondent to register the Sale Deed dated 13.08.2024 presented by petitioner, within a time frame as may be fixed bythis Court. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Arivazhagan For Respondent : Mr.Stalin Abhimanyu Additional Government PleaderORDERThis Writ Petition has been filed challenging the order passed by the respondent in Check Slip RFL/Pallakkode/201/2024 dated 13.08.2024, thereby refusing to register the document and quash the same as ...
Esther Violet Linett.S, Vs The Principal Secretary
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Oct-24-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 24.10.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ Esther Violet Linett S Petitioner(s) Vs Chennai 600 008. ...Respondent(s)PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st and 2nd respondent to regularize the petitioner's appointment as Nurse in the regular pay scale of Rs.9300 34800/- plus Grade Pay Rs.4,550/- or any other present regular pay scale at par with the other government nurses with effect from the respective date of appointment.For Petitioner(s) : No appearance For Respondent(s) : Mr.E.Sundaram R1 and R2 Government Advocate For R3 : Mr.L.Murugavelu Standing CounselORDERWhen the case was taken up for hearing on 26.09.2025, there was no representation for the petitioner, therefore, it was directed to be listed under the caption 'for dismissal'.2. Today also when the case is called, there is no representation for the petitio...
Mohana Priya.V Vs The Principal Secretary
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Oct-24-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 24.10.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ Mohana Priya V Petitioner(s) Vs Chennai 600 008. ...Respondent(s)PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st and 2nd respondent to regularize the petitioner's appointment as Nurse in the regular pay scale of Rs.9,300 34,800/- plus Grade Pay Rs.4,550/- or any other present regular pay scale at par with the other government nurses with effect from the respective date of appointment.For Petitioner(s) : No appearance For Respondent(s) : Mr.E.Sundaram R1 and R2 Government Advocate For R3 : Mr.L.Murugavelu Standing CounselORDERWhen the case was taken up for hearing on 26.09.2025, there was no representation for the petitioner, therefore, it was directed to be listed under the caption 'for dismissal'.2. Today also when the case is called, there is no representation for the petitioner. H...
Brindha.N, Vs The Principal Secretary
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Oct-24-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 24.10.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ Brindha N Petitioner(s) Vs Chennai 600 008. ...Respondent(s)PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st and 2nd respondent to regularize the petitioner's appointment as Nurse in the regular pay scale of Rs.9,300 34,800/- plus Grade Pay Rs.4,550/- or any other present regular pay scale at par with the other government nurses with effect from the respective date of appointment.For Petitioner(s) : No appearance For Respondent(s) : Mr.E.Sundaram R1 and R2 Government Advocate For R3 : Mr.L.Murugavelu Standing CounselORDERWhen the case was taken up for hearing on 26.09.2025, there was no representation for the petitioner, therefore, it was directed to be listed under the caption 'for dismissal'.2. Today also when the case is called, there is no representation for the petitioner. Hence,...
- ‹ Prev
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- Next ›
- Last »