Chennai Orders Court October 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
A.Premkumar vs the State of Tamilnadu
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Oct-29-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 29.10.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Dr.A.Premkumar ... Petitioner -Vs-1. The Government of Tamil Nadu, Represented By Its Principal Secretary,Taluk Office Campus, Perambalur. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents herein to disburse Government Contribution in Petitioner CPS Account No. 7172778/VETY within the time frame fixed by this Hon'ble Court. For Petitioner : Ms.D.Kamatchi For Respondents : Mr.Yogesh Kannadasan Special Government PleaderORDERWhen the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition and he has also made an endorsement in the Court bundle to that effect.2. In view of the above submission and endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as with...
Hotel Chandra Towers Ltd vs the Recovery Officer
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Oct-29-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29.10.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE R. KALAIMATHI and M/s.Hotel Chandra Towers Ltd., No.9, Gandhi Road, Egmore, Chennai-600 008. Rep.by its Managing Director. .. Appellant Vs. 1.The Recovery Officer,2. Hendry Isidore3. Raju Isidore4.Indian Bank, Chennai-600 008. ..Respondents Prayer: This Civil Miscellaneous Second Appeal is filed under Section 82 of Employees State Insurance Act, 1948, against the Order and Decree of Employees Insurance Court, (Principal Labour Court) Chennai dated 04.11.2023 in E.I.O.P.No.16 of 2011. For Appellant : Mr.Haroon Rasheed for AGAM LEGAL For Respondents : Mr.G.Bhardwaj[R1] Mr.M.Dinesh[R3] Mr.Rajendran Raghavan[R4] R2 No AppearanceORDERA memo has been filed on behalf of the appellant stating that Employees' State Insurance Corporation introduced an Amnesty Scheme whereby, if an employer is unable to produce records disputing the contribution, 30% of the claim amount may be deposited with the Employ...
Dr. G.Anitha, Vs The Health Secretary,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Oct-29-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29-10-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K. SURENDER WP Nos. 19749 & 19751 of 2015 and MP.Nos.1 &2 of 2015 Dr. G.Anitha, Petitioner in W.P.No.19749 of 2015 Dr. M.Uma Maheswari Petitioner in W.P.No.19751 of 2015 Vs Respondent in both WPs PRAYER in W.P.No.19749 of 2015 PRAYER in WP No. 19751 of 2015: In Both WPs For Petitioner(s): Mr.S.Thanka Sivan For Respondent(s): Mr.GopinathORDERThese Writ Petitions have been filed seeking a direction to the respondents to grant permanent employment to the petitioners as Dentist under the 2nd respondent with all consequential monetary and attendant benefits by regularizing the employment of the petitioners from the date of original appointment order dated 09.03.2010.2. The learned counsel for the petitioners reported that the petitionershave been granted permanent employment as Dentists, their services have been regularized and all outstanding amounts have been paid to them and they have no furt...
Dr.P.V.Radhakrishna Vs Central Council of Indian Medicine,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Oct-29-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 29.10.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR W.P.Nos.3898, 3902, 3910 & 3914 of 2021 Dr.P.V.Radhakrishna ... Petitioner in W.P.No.3898/2021 Dr.P.Penchala Rao ... Petitioner in W.P.No.3902/2021 Dr.P.R.Swaminathan ... Petitioner in W.P.No.3910/2021 Dr.T.Udaykiran ... Petitioner in W.P.No.3914/2021 vs1. Central Council of Indian Medicine, Rep. by its Secretary, Office: 61-65, Institutional Area, Janakpuri, D-Block, New Delhi 110 058.2. The Ministry of Ayurveda, Yoga & Naturopathy, Unani, Siddha and Homeopathy (AYUSH) Government of India, Represented by its Secretary, 'B' Block, GPO Complex, INA, New Delhi 110 023.3. The Principal, Sri Sai Ram Ayurveda Medical College and Research Centre, Sai Leo Nagar, Poonthandalam, West Tambaram, Chennai 600 044. Respondents in all Petitions Common Prayer: Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of Constitution ofIndia, to issue Writ of Cetriorari, calling for the records r...
G.Sekar vs Government of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Oct-29-2025
W.M.P.Nos.6707, 6740, 6752 & 13777 of 2025 in WP.Nos.6099, 6131, 6142 & 12217 of G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J., These petitions are ordered on payment of separate Court fees by the petitioners. 29.10.2025 (2/2) shr https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
K.V.Ramana Raju (Senior Citizen) Vs Dr. M. Sai Kumar and another
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Oct-29-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29.10.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR Mr.K.V.Ramana Raju S/o. Late Mr.Venkata Raju ... Petitioner Vs.1. The Principal Secretary/Commissioner Dr.M.Saikumar, Chepauk, Chennai 600 005.2. The Assistant Commissioner,Mr.Marimuthu Pandian, 4th Floor, Kuralagam, NSC Bose Road, Esplanade, Chennai 600 001. ... Respondents Contempt Petition filed u/s.11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, praying to punish the respondents for wilful disobedience of theorder dated 13.08.2024 passed by this Court in W.P.No.23055 of 2024.For Petitioner : Mr.Vijay Gurudass For Respondent : Mr.T.M.Rajangam Government Advocate *****S.SOUNTHAR, J.mpORDERToday, when the contempt petition is taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent as well as thelearned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the orderpassed in the main writ petition has been complied with.2. Recording the same, this contempt petition ...
Seperumal vs Ganesan
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Oct-29-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29-10-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY Seperumal S/o. Azhaga Padaiyachi, Ponparappi Village (Karaippatti Street), Sendurai Taluk, Ariyalur District. Appellant(s) Vs Ganesan S/o. Sakthivel, No.9, Sbi Colony, Cuddalore. Respondent(s) PRAYER This Criminal Appeal is filed under Section 378 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Code, to set aside the judgment dated 10.12.2021 made in C.A.No.07 of 2020 on the file of the learned Principal District & Sessions Court, Ariyalur and upheld the judgment passed in STC.No.158 of 2019 dated 09.11.2020 on the file of the learned District Munsif-Cum-Judicial Magistrate, Sendurai. For Appellant(s): Mr. K.Sasindran For Respondent(s): No appearanceORDERWhen the matter came up for hearing, the learned counsel for the appellant would submit that the matter has since been settled out of Court. He has also made an endorsement to that effect in the Court bundle. 2.Recording the same, the Cri...
K.Veerappan vs S.Selvaraju(Died)
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Oct-29-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDated : 29.10.2025CoramThe Hon'ble Mr. Justice P.DHANABAL and M.P.No.1 of 2015 1.K.Veerappan 2.B.Balamurthy ...Appellants Vs 1.S.Selvaraju (Died) 2.S.Usha 3.S.Thaiyalnayagi 4.S.Pushpa ...Respondents Sole respondent died, RR2 to 4 are brought on record as LRs of the deceased sole respondent vide order of Court dated 03.09.2024 in S.A.No.317 of 2015. The Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of CPC, against thejudgment and decree made in A.S.No.3 of 2013 dated 11.07.2013 on the fileof the I Additional Sub Court, Cuddalore, reversing the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.571 of 2008 dated 31.10.2012 on the file of the Principal District Munsif, Cuddalore. For Appellants : Ms.R.Meenal For R1 : Died For RR2 to 4 : Mr.R.GururajJUDGMENTThe learned Counsel appearing for the appellants seeks permission of this Court for withdrawal of this Second Appeal as the matter was settled out of the Court between the parties and she has also made an endorse...
The Manager vs Shamsad Begum
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Oct-29-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29.10.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE R. KALAIMATHI The Manager, Sriram General Insurance Company Limited, No.66, 2nd Floor, City Center Complex, Thirumalai Pillai Road, Chennai 17 .. Petitioners Vs.1. Shamsad Begum2. Shamira Parveen3. Raisa Parveen4. Jennatul Ruwaita5. Mohammad Shameer6. Mohammad7. Talib Rahman ..RespondentsPrayer: This Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed under Section 173(1) of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, to condone the delay of 263 days in preferring the above appeal. For Petitioners : Mr.R.Sree Vidhya For R1 to R6 : Mr.A.Muthukumar For R7 : Notice dispensed withORDERThis petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 263 days in preferring the appeal.2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners.3. The learned counsel for the respondents no.1 to 6 has got objections in allowing the petition.4. The petitioners would aver that the case papers were mixed with other files and hence, the delay of 263 days ...
Krishnamurthy Mudaliar (Died) vs Chellapappa
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Oct-29-2025
C.M.P.Nos.2030, 2031 and 2032 of 2016 in S.A.No.1048 of 2008MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR,J.Notice is served on respondents No.7 to 11. Respondent No.11 is represented by counsel. No counter affidavit is filed.2. In the light of the above, all these three miscellaneous petitions tocondone the delay of 83 days in filing the petition to set aside the abatement caused due to the death of the appellant; to set aside the abatement; and to bring on record the petitioner as the second appellant and respondent Nos.7 to 11 as respondents 7 to 11 being the legal heirs of the deceased appellant in the Second Appeal, respectively, are allowed.3. Registry is directed to carry out amendment. However, this is without prejudice to the rights of the contesting respondents in the main appeal with regard to the Will, said to have been executed by the deceased appellant. dixit 29.10.2025MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR, J.dixit 29.10.2025...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »