Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

S.Mariammal vs P.Subramani

S.Mariammal vs P.Subramani

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Oct 27, 2025
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1809219

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CMP/8603/2023

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

S.Mariammal

Respondent

P.Subramani

Excerpt

cmp nos.8603 & 8604 of 2023 in sa.no.4 of 2008 mr.mumminenisudheer kumar, j.ms.zeenath begum, learned counsel already entered appearance for the respondents 2, 3, 5 to 9 and reported no objection to order both the petitions. 2.considering the same and being satisfied with the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavits, these petitions are allowed. the proposed respondents 10 to 13 herein shall stand impleaded as the respondents 10 to 13 in the main second appeal, being the legal heirs of deceased r4. 3.registry is directed to carry out necessary amendment.dn 27.10.2025 1/1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Full Judgment

CMP Nos.8603 & 8604 of 2023 in SA.No.4 of 2008 MR.MUMMINENI

SUDHEER KUMAR, J.

Ms.Zeenath Begum, learned counsel already entered appearance for the respondents 2, 3, 5 to 9 and reported no objection to order both the petitions. 2.Considering the same and being satisfied with the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavits, these petitions are allowed. The proposed respondents 10 to 13 herein shall stand impleaded as the respondents 10 to 13 in the main second appeal, being the legal heirs of deceased R4. 3.Registry is directed to carry out necessary amendment.

dn 27.10.2025 1/1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Chennai Orders · 2025 Same Parties S.Mariammal vs P.Subramani Same Judge Honourable Mr.Justice Mummineni Sudheer Kumar

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales