Chennai Orders Court January 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ponnazhagan Vs The Sub- Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-31-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 31-01-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN CRL OP NO. 2437 of 2025 Ponnazhagan S/o. Krishnamurthi, 127/1,Perumal Kovil Street, Nadiyapattu, Palakollai, Virudhachalam Taluk, Petitioner(s) Vs The Sub- Inspector of Police, Aladi Police Station, Cuddalore District. in Crime No. 13 of 2025 Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s): S Saravanakumar For Respondent(s): Public ProsecutorORDERToday, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.SUNDER MOHAN, J.stn2. In view of the submission and endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 31.01.2025 stn To1. The Sub- Inspector of Police, Aladi Police Station, in Crime No. 13 of 2025 Crl.O.P. No.2437 of 2025...
J.Arockia Akilan vs the State Rep by, the Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-31-2025
Crl.M.P.No.1628 of 2025 in Crl.R.C.SR.No.5394 of 2025SUNDER MOHAN, J.Dispense with ordered for the present. 31.01.2025 Anu Note: Registry is directed to number this Criminal Revision, if it is otherwise in order, for admission on 20.02.2025. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 1/1...
M/s. P S Bedi and Company Limited Vs M s Indian Oil Corporation Limite ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-31-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 31-01-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE P.B. BALAJI M/s. P S Bedi and Company Limited D 14 1 Okhla Industrial Area Phase I New Delhi Applicant(s) Vs M s Indian Oil Corporation Limited Marketing Divisiion, Southern Region, Indian Oil Bhavan, 139, Uthamar Gandhi Road, Nungambakkam High Road, Chennai 600 034D 14 1 Okhla Industrial Area Phase I New Delhi Respondent(s) For Applicant(s): M/s. S.Vasudevan, For Respondent(s): Mr.Mohammed Fayaz AliORDERThis application has been filed to extend the time limit to make the arbitral award by the Arbitrator for a period of six months or any other time frame. 2.Heard the learned counsel for the applicant and the learned counsel for the respondent.3.Mr.Mohammed Fayaz Ali, learned counsel for the respondent would fairly submits that the respondent has no objection for the time being extended. I have also gone through the affidavit filed in support of the extension application. I am unable to see any undu...
Kingslin Devakumar vs the State of Tamilnadu, Rep by
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-31-2025
Crl.M.P.No.1612 of 2025 in Crl.A.SR.No.5758 of 2025SUNDER MOHAN, J.This petition is filed to condone the delay of 64 days in filing Crl.A.Sr.No.5758 of 2025 against Spl.S.C.No.7 of 2021 on the file of the learned Sessions Judge, Fast Track Mahila Court, Ariyalur. 2.Heard the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side). 3.Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the delay stands condoned and the petition is ordered. 31.01.2025 Anu Note: Registry is directed to number the Criminal Appeal, if it is otherwise in order. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 1/1...
Tvs Motor Company Limited vs M/S. Ashwa Motors,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-31-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 31-01-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE P.B. BALAJI Tvs Motor Company Limited Nungambakkam, Chennai 600006 Applicant(s) Vs M/s. Ashwa Motors, Nungambakkam, Chennai 600006Partner ship firm, No.311, Ring Road, Banashankari 3rd Stage, bengaluru 56085 Karnataka and 4 Others Respondent(s) For Applicant(s): Ms.K.Sheeraja SatishM/s. Rahul Balaji for Mr.Rahul BalajiORDERThis application has been filed to extend the time period for completion of the arbitration proceedings and passing of award by the learned Sole Arbitrator by a period of six months. 2.Heard the learned counsel for the applicant. 3.The learned counsel for the applicant would submit that the arbitration proceedings are at the stage of arguments and the respondent did not choose to appear even before the Arbitrator. Hence, I dispense with notice in the present application for extension of mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal. 4.I have gone through the affidavit filed in support of the ...
S.Kasiramalingam vs the Secretary
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-31-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 31.01.2025CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.JOTHIRAMAN W.P.No.3562 of 2025 and W.M.P.Nos.3942 & 3943 of 2025 S.Kasiramalingam ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Secretary, The Bar Council of Tamil Nadu and Puducherry, 2.The Registrar General, Madras High Court, 3.The Secretary, Madras High Court Advocates Association, 4.The Secretary, Law Association, 5.The Secretary, Women Lawyers Association, 6.The Secretary, Madras Bar Association, 7.The Secretary, Tamil Nadu Advocate's Clerk's Association, New Additional Law Chambers, Chennai 600 104. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of Writ of Certiorari Mandamus, calling for the records of the 1st respondent and quash/recall the impugned notification bearing R.O.C. No.90 of 2025 dated 24.01.2025 of the 1st respondent till the newly elected members are constituted ...
Central Organization of vs Tamil Nadu Generation and
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-31-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 31.01.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR and M.P.Nos.1 and 2 of 2011 Central Organization of Tamil Nadu, Electricity Employees, Salem Electricity Distribution, Circle Branch, Rep. by its President, V.P.Chindn Ninaivagam, No.39-E-1, VPC Street, Cinema Nagar, Salem 9. ... Petitioner Vs.1. Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation, Rep. by its Chief Engineer (Personnel), New No.144, Anna Salai, Chennai 12.2. The Chief Engineer (General Construction), VI Floor, New No.144, Anna Salai, Chennai 2.3. The Superintending Engineer, General Construction Circle (Salem), Udayapatti, Salem 14.4. The Labour Officer, Salem 1.5. Thiru. R.Vasudevan6. Thiru.T.Govindasamy7. Thiru.E.Murugan8. Thiru.A.Balu ... RespondentsPrayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for records pertaining to the order dated 10.10.2011 in Memo No.618/AdmI/...
P.Shanthi, vs the Secretary to Government of
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-31-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 31.01.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR and M.P.Nos.1 & 2 of 2012 and 1 of 2013 P.Shanthi ... Petitioner Vs.1. The Secretary to Government of Tamil Nadu, Social Welfare and Nutritious Meal Program Department, Chennai 600 009.2. The Director,Social Welfare Department, Chepauk, Chennai 600 005. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records connected with the impugned order passed by the first respondent in G.O (Ms) No.22 SW & NMP dated 03.03.2003 and quash para (2) insofar as it relates to the recruitment by transfer of service to the post of Child Development Project Officer and Zonal Project Nutritional Office from the Holders of the post of superintendents in the Tamil Nadu Ministerial Service in the Social Welfare Department and consequently direct the first respondent to promote the pe...
G. Govinda Gramani vs Manickkammal
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-31-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 31-01-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI AND G. Govinda Gramani S/o. Gopal Gramani, Main Road, Palayaseevaram Vill, Kancheepuram Dt. Vs Mudaliar Rice Mill, Kancheepuram Tk. and 4 Others G.Govinda Gramani Vs Taluk and 4 Others M/s. M.P.Rajavelayutham Mr. A.MUTHUKUMARORDERThis Petition has been filed to set aside and restore the Second appeal No.623 of 2006, which was dismissed for non-prosecution on 02.09.2014.2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondents.3. On being satisfied with the averments stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition and the submissions made by the learned counsels on either side, the petition stands allowed.4. Registry is directed to restore the above Second Appeal No.623 of 2006 and Post the case on 11.03.2025. 31-01-2025 To Mudaliar Rice Mill, Kancheepuram Tk.2. A. Murugadoss . . .5. SUJATHA. Taluk2. A.Murugadoss5. SUJATHA rri...
P. Anbalagan Vs The State Rep by its
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-31-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 31.01.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR P.Anbalagan ... Petitioner Vs.1. The State Rep by its The Managing Director,2. The General Manager, Chennai 600 002. ... RespondentsPrayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records pertaining to the impugned order passed by the Respondent-1 herein in Order No.32311/Sa BI (O Na) 14/Ma Po Ka /2012 Dated 20.05.2015 and quash the same as illegal. For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondents : Mr.C.Gauthamaraj, Standing CounselORDERThis writ petition has been filed challenging the order of suspension suspending the petitioner from service on the ground of involvement of the petitioner in a criminal case.2. When this matter earlier came up for consideration before this courtyesterday, it is brought to the notice of this court by the learned counsel appearing for the respondents that the petiti...