Chennai Orders Court January 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M.Kathiresan vs State Through
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-31-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDated: 31.01.2025Coram:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN and Crl.M.P.No.2886 of 2023 -- M.Kathiresan .. Petitioner Vs.1. State through The Inspector of Police,2. J.Madhumitha .. RespondentsCriminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. praying to call for the records pertaining in Crime No.416 of 2022 on the file of the first respondent and quash the same as illegal. For petitioner : Mr.S.Mohamed Ansar For respondents: Mr.S.Sugendran, Addl.P.P. for R-1 M/s.V.Vadivalagia Nambi for R-2ORDERThis petition is filed to call for the records pertaining in Crime No.416 of 2022 on the file of the first respondent and quash the same as illegal. Page No.1/32. It is submitted by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the first respondent that charge-sheet has been filed in LTN20230002762/C202500011, before the Judicial Magistrate-III, Coimbatore, on 24.01.2025.3. In view of the above submission, this petition is disposed of. ...
Tvl.Sri Supra Enterprises (P)Ltd Vs The State Tax officer
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-31-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDated : 31.01.2025CoramTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ and W.M.P.Nos.6769 & 6771 of 2023 Tvl.Sri Supra Enterprises (P)Ltd, Rep. by the Managing Director, Mr.G.Ravi, No.106, 3rd Floor, Santhome High Road, Chennai 600 028. ...Petitioner in both W.P's Vs. Chennai-28. ... Respondent in both W.P's Prayer in W.P.No.6713 of 2023: This Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of dated 16.08.2019 bearing order No.TIN.33870803646/ 2014-15. Prayer in W.P.No.6717 of 2023: This Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of dated 16.08.2019 bearing order No.TIN.33870803646/2013-14. Appearance in both W.P's For Petitioner : M/s.Rakshana Velayudhan For Respondent : Mr.C.Harsha Raj Additional Government PleaderCOMMON ORDERToday when these matters are taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks leave of this Court to withdraw these writ petitions and he also made an endorsement to that effect.2. In view of th...
John Britto Vs Ms. R.A. Priyanka
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-31-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDated 31.01.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR John Britto ... Petitioner Vs.1. R.A.Priyanka, The Revenue Divisional Officer cum Sub Collector (In charge), Hosur, Krishnagiri District.2. V.Saisangeetha, Sub Registrar, Denikanikottai, Krishnagiri District. ... RespondentsPrayer: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 to punish the respondents for disobeying the orders passed by this court in W.P.No.15388 of 2020, dated 01.09.2023. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Balaguruswamy For Respondents : Mr.S.J.Mohamed Sathic, Govt.Adv.ORDERThe learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents submitted that theorder of this court in W.P.No.15388 of 2020, dated 01.09.2023 has beencomplied with.2. Recording the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the Government Advocate, this contempt petition is closed. Index:Yes/No Internet:Yes/No mstS.SOU...
John Britto Vs Ms. R.A. Priyanka
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-31-2025
S.SOUNTHAR.J., The Contempt Petition is listed under the caption 'For Being Spoken To', today.2. When the contempt petition was taken up for hearing on 10.01.2025, therewas no representation for the petitioner and the order passed in W.P.No.15388 of 2020 allowing the prayer was not brought to the notice of this Court. By taking into consideration the liberty granted to the petitioner in W.P.No.11820 of 2023, I dictated order closing contempt petition. When the said order was typed and presented for signature, I noted the allowing of writ petition W.P.No.15388 of 2020 and hence, I thought it fit to hear the matter again. Hence, the Registry was directed to list the matter under the above mentioned caption.3. Since the said order was passed without considering the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.15388 of 2020 allowing the prayer, the order passed in this contempt petition dated 10.01.2025 (not signed) is recalled.4. The learned Government Advocate appearing for the respond...
Karunakaran vs the Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-31-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDated: 31.01.2025Coram:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN and Crl.M.P.No.4553 of 2023 ---1. Mr.Karunakaran2. Mrs.Bavithra .. Petitioners Vs.1. The Inspector of Police,2. Mr.M.Sayed Rahman .. RespondentsCriminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to call for the records relating to the First Information Report in Crime No.6 of 2023, dated 14.02.2023 on the file of the first respondent and quash the same. For petitioner : M/s.I.Arockoia Selvaraj For respondents: Mr.S.Sugendran, Addl.P.P. for R-1ORDERPage No.1/3 This petition is filed praying to call for the records relating to the First Information Report in Crime No.6 of 2023, dated 14.02.2023 on the file of the first respondent and quash the same.2. When this petition is taken up for hearing, learned Additional PublicProsecutor appearing for the first respondent submitted that charge-sheet has been filed in No.LTN20220002619/C2025007, on 28.01.2025 before the Judici...
Vijayakumar vs Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-31-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDated: 31.01.2025Coram:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN and Crl.M.P.No.5215 of 2023 --- Vijayakumar, Managing Director Meritt Ventures Private Ltd., 2C, 2nd Floor, Thachil Centre, Raja Annamalai Road, Saibaba Colony, Coimbatore-641 011. .. Petitioner Vs.1. State Rep. by Inspector of Police,2. Santhosh Kumar .. RespondentsCriminal Original Petition file under Section 482 Cr.P.C. praying to call for the records relating to FIR in Crime No.381 of 2022, dated 10.07.2022, pending on the file of the first respondent and quash the same. For petitioner : Mr.Niranjan Rajagopalan for M/s.G.R.Associates For respondents: Mr.S.Sugendran, Addl.P.P. for R-1 Not ready in notice regarding R-2 Page No.1/3ORDERThis petition is filed praying to to call for the records relating to FIR in Crime No.381 of 2022, dated 10.07.2022, pending on the file of the first respondent and quash the same.2. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the first responde...
S.Udhayakumar vs the District Collector
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-31-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDated : 31.01.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE Ms. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA W.P.No. 8228 of 2024 S.Udhayakumar ...Petitioners Vs. 1.The District Collector Office of the Collectorate, 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer Office of the RDO, 3.The Thasildar Office of the Thasildar, Natrampalli Taluk, Thirupathur District. 4.R.Dhinakaran ...RespondentsPrayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for records relating to the impugned notices in file no.2023 / 0103 / 36 / 242973 dated 20.10.2023 and file no. 2023 / 0103 / 36 / 242762 dated 20.10.2023 on the file of the 3rd respondent and quash the same and consequently direct the 3rd respondent to take action on the petitioner's application in FORM - VI under Rule 12 of Patta Pass Book Act dated 25.01.2024 to cancel the patta no. 5572 stands in the name of the 4th respondent and issue the same patta to the petitioner.For Petitioner :...
R.Pitchai Vs Government of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-31-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 31.01.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND R. Pitchai ... Petitioner Vs. 1.Government of Tamil Nadu, rep., by Secretary to Government, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Chennai 600 009. 2.The Commissioner of Revenue Administration, Chepauk, Chennai 600 005. 3.The District Collector, Pudukottai District, Pudukottai.4.The Accountant General, Chennai 600 018. ... Respondents Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents 1 to 3 to fix the pay of the petitioner consequent on his appointments to the posts of Deputy Tahsildar, Tahsildar, Deputy Collector and District Revenue Officer, sanction annual increments and on that basis revise his pensionary benfits and disburse the arrears thereof with interest for delayed payment, all within a limited time frame as deemed fit by this Court.For Petitioner : Mr. M. Ravi For Respondents : Mr. R. Neelakand...
G.Sreenivasan Vs K.Nandakumar,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-31-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 31.01.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR Cont.P. No.1702 of 2022 and Sub.Appl.No.403 of 2022 G.Sreenivasan .. Petitioner Vs. 1.K.Nandakumar, The Commissioner of School Education, 2.Kannappan, The Director of School Education, 3.Munusamy, The Chief Education Officer, No.8, Collectorate Building, 'B' Block, Sathuvachari, Vellore 632 009. .. Respondents [R1 and R3 are the new implementing Authorities. Hence, they are included as Party respondents as per SEA WARD principle adopted in AIR 1993 Mad 323 (FB)]Prayer: Contempt petition filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Court Act, 1971, to initiate appropriate contempt proceedings against the respondents 1 to 3 herein under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act 1971 for the wilful disobedience of the order dated 26.03.2021 made in W.P.No.1128 of 2015 and consequently in the event of holding them guilty of Contempt, punish them under Section 12 of the Cont...
M/s.Edwina Amudha, Vs L Subramaniam
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-31-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASReserved on : 10.01.2025Pronounced on : 31.01.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE P.B. BALAJI Ms.Edwin Amudha Applicant(s) Vs 1.L.Subramaniam Partner M/s.S.Arumairaj No.15 Kasturi Rangan Road, Alwarpet, Chennai 18. 2.The Superintending Engineer, Highways, Construction and Maintenance, Chennai Circle No.299, Anna Salai, Chennai 600 025. Respondent(s) For Applicant(s): Mr.R.Srinivas Senior Counsel for S.K.Chandrakumar For Respondent(s) For R1 : Mr. For R2 : Mr.D.BalaramanORDERThe Application in A.No.1725 of 2017 filed by a partner, Edwin Amudha to implead herself in the above proceedings was dismissed by me on 09.01.2025. However, for the purpose of clarity, it is made clear that the award is only in favour of the partnership firm and not the individual, S.Arumairaj and this, in my opinion, would sufficiently protect the interest of the partners of the firm.2.The present application is seeking interim injunction under Section 9 of the Arbitration...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- Next ›
- Last »