Skip to content

Chennai Orders Court January 2025 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Jan 31 2025

M/s Aynaz Construction India Private Limited Vs Sirajunnissa Begum,

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Jan-31-2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 31-01-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE P.B. BALAJI M/s Aynaz Construction India Private Limited 600 034 represented by its director Mr.A.Syed Ismail Refeek, Old No.14, New No.31, Kutty Street, Nungambakkam, Chennai 34 Applicant(s) Vs Sirajunnissa Begum, 600 034, W/o. of Late Abdul Hadi, New No.8, Old No.AP-1687 103rd Street, 14th Sector, K.K.Nagar, Chennai 78 and 6 Others Respondent(s) For Applicant(s) : Mr.E.K.Kumaresan For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Sadasharam & Mrs.R.Meenakshi for 1 to 7ORDERThis Application has been filed for extension of mandate of the sole Arbitrator. 2.Heard Mr.E.K.Kumaresan, learned counsel for the Applicant and Mr.S.Sadasharam, learned counsel for the respondents.3. I have gone through the affidavit filed in support of the above Application seeking extension of the mandate of the sole Arbitrator.4. It is seen from the affidavit that pursuant to the learned Arbitrator entering uponreference, the parties tried to se...


Jan 31 2025

Sadhasivam vs the State by, the Inspector of Police,

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Jan-31-2025

Crl.M.P.No.1499 of 2025 in Crl.RC.SR.No.5525 of 2025SUNDER MOHAN, J.This petition is filed to condone the delay of 44 days in filing the above revision in Crl.RC.Sr.No.5525 of 2025 filed against the order dated 02.09.2024 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Katpadi, Vellore District in Crl.M.P.No.1666 of 2024 in Cr.No.56 of 2023. 2.Heard the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side). 3.Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the delay stands condoned and the petition is ordered. 31.01.2025 Anu Note: Registry is directed to number the Criminal Appeal, if it is otherwise in order. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 1/1...


Jan 31 2025

D Jagadeesan vs State Represented by,the Inspector of Police

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Jan-31-2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 31-01-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN D Jagadeesan S/o. Dakshanamurhy, No.3 3rd Cross Road, Cholambedu Road, Thirumullavoyal, Tiruvallur and 2 Others Petitioner(s) Vs State Represented By,the Inspector Of Police ALGSC Team, Central Crime Branch, Vepery Chennai Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s): Sagayanathan S S.Sagayanathan G.P. Kothandaraman For Respondent(s): Public ProsecutorORDERToday, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.2. In view of the submission and endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 31-01-2025 msv To The Inspector Of Police ALGSC Team, Central Crime Branch, Vepery Chennai...


Jan 31 2025

C.Thangavelu vs the State Rep.by, the Inspector of Police,

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Jan-31-2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDated: 31.01.2025Coram:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN -- C.Thangavelu .. Petitioner Vs. The State represented by The Inspector of Police, (FIR No.655 of 2020) .. Respondent Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. / Section 528 of BNSS, 2023, praying to issue suitable direction to the respondent-Police to file final report in FIR.No.655 of 2020 on the file of the respondent-Police within a reasonable time. For petitioner : Mr.C.Palanisamy For respondent: Mr.S.Vinoth Kumar, Govt. Advocate (Crl. Side)ORDERThe petitioner has filed the above petition seeking to issue suitable direction to the respondent-Police to file final report in FIR.No.655 of 2020 on the file of the respondent-Police within a reasonable time. Page No.1/32. Learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent submitted that the FIR has already been filed on 30.01.2025 before the Judicial Magistrate No.2, Dharmapuri in No.C2025000026.3. I...


Jan 31 2025

D.Vijay vs the State Rep by, the Inspector of Police

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Jan-31-2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDated: 31.01.2025Coram:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN -- D.Vijay .. Petitioner Vs. Thiruvannamalaia District.2. N.Vaibhav .. RespondentsCriminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of the BNSS, 2023 to direct the first respondent not to harass the petitioner and restrain the first respondent from intefering with civil issues in respect of the petitioner's property. For petitioner : Mr.S.Sriram For respondents: Mr.S.Vinoth Kumar, Govt. Advocate (Crl. Side) for R-1ORDERThe petitioner has filed this petition praying to direct the first respondent not to harass the petitioner and restrain the first respondent from interfering with the civil issues in respect of the petitioner's property.2. This is a case and counter filed by the second respondent andsubsequently, the respondents/Police came to know that there is a civil dispute between the parties and therefore, the complaint was closed. Therefore, there is no harassment as a...


Jan 31 2025

Manikandan @ Ottavada Mani vs State Rep by, Inspector of Police

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Jan-31-2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 31.01.2025CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN Manikandan @ Ottavada Mani ... Petitioner Vs. State Rep. by, Inspector of Police, Chennai. (Crime No.804 of 2024). ... Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of BNSS, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Crime No.804 of 2024, on the file of the Inspector of Police, P-6 Kodungaiyur Police Station. For Petitioner : Mr.D.Manojkumar For Respondent : Mr.Leonard Arul Joseph Selvam Government Advocate (Crl.Side)ORDERWhen the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the Petitioner seeks leave of this Court to withdraw this Petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect. 2.In view of the endorsement and the submission made by the learned counsel for the Petitioner, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.saiSUNDER MOHAN, J.sai To 1.The Inspector of Police, Chennai. 2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras....


Jan 31 2025

Kamal vs the State Rep by, Inspector of Police

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Jan-31-2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 31.01.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN Kamal Petitioner(s) Vs The State Rep By, The Inspector of Police, Tiruvannamalai District. (Crime No.418/2024) Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s): E.Sathiyaraj For Respondent(s): Mr.Leonard Arul Joseph Selvam Government Advocate (Crl.Side)ORDERLearned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.SUNDER MOHAN.,J.ham2. In view of the submission and the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. 31.01.2025 To1. The Inspector of Police, Tiruvannamalai District HAM...


Jan 31 2025

Kannan vs State Rep by

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Jan-31-2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 31.01.2025CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN 1.Kannan 2.Shanmugam ... Petitioners / A1 & A2 Vs. State Represented by The Inspector of Police, Cr.No.Not Known ... Respondent / Complainant PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioners on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest in Crime No.not known on the file of the respondent Police. For Petitioners : Ms.Pandi Meena For Respondent : Mr.S.Santhosh, Government Advocate (Crl.Side)ORDERApprehending arrest in connection with Crime No.Not Known registered for the offences punishable under Sections 296(b), 115(2), 118(1), 35(3) of Bharathia Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS), the present petition has been filed by the petitioners seeking anticipatory bail.2. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent Police submitted that ...


Jan 31 2025

Union of India vs Kotteshwariamma

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Jan-31-2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 31-01-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE S.M. SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JOTHIRAMAN IN WP NO. 3391 OF 2025 Union of India Ministry of Communications IT Department of Posts DakBhawan SansadMarg New Delhi 110 011 and 3 Others Petitioner(s) Vs KOTTESHWARIAMMA W/o.Subbarao, No.J22 P And T Quarters, Vyasar Nagar, Chennai-600 039 Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s): For Respondent(s): R.Malaichamy(caveator) C.Premkumar (caveator) T.Ramya (caveator) T.Ashok Raj(caveator) C.Dharmaraj(caveator) K.Vanisree(caveator)ORDER(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble S.m.Subramaniam J.) Dispensed with for the present. (S.M.SUBRAMANIAM J.) (M.JOTHIRAMAN J.) 31-01-2025 (2/3) sli To1. KOTTESHWARIAMMA W/o.Subbarao, No.J22 P And T Quarters, Vyasar Nagar, Chennai-600...


Jan 31 2025

A.Neppoliyan vs the Deputy Superintendent of Police

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Jan-31-2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDated: 31.01.2025Coram:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN ---1. A.Neppoliyan2. Viji @ Vijiyarasan3. V.Murugan4. A.Appu @ Loganathan .. Petitioners Vs.2. State rep. by The Inspector of Police, (Crime No.12/2025) .. RespondentsCriminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to direct the Principal District Sessions Judge, Thiruvannamalai District to consider the bail application sympathetically and pass orders on merits on the same day on the petitioners surrender in connection with Cr.No.12 of 2025 pending before the respondents/Police.For petitioner : Mr.P.Rajendiran For respondents: Mr.S.Vinoth Kumar, Govt. Advocate (Crl. Side) Page No.1/3ORDERIn view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner on the petition, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn. cs To2. The Inspector of Police, (Crime No.12/2025)3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. Page No.2/3 P.VELMURUGAN, J cs Page No.3/3...


  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial