Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Central Organization of vs Tamil Nadu Generation and

Central Organization of vs Tamil Nadu Generation and

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Jan 31, 2025
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1759015

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP/26335/2011

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Central Organization of

Respondent

Tamil Nadu Generation and

Excerpt

.....: no appearancefor r6 : dismissed vide court orderdated 30.08.2016orderthis writ petition has been filed by an organization making a claim for promotion of some of its members over and above the respondents 5 to 8.2. this court has entertained a doubt about the maintainability of thewrit petition at the instance of an organization, especially considering the fact that the claim made is for promotion. however, it is brought to the notice of this court by mr.c.ramkumar, learned counsel appearing for the respondents 1 to 3, that during the pendancy of the present writ petition, three members of the petitioners viz., thiru.r.thangaraj, thiru.k.munusamy and thiru.ponnusamy were already promoted to the post of 'foreman grade - i' and the said three persons as well as the respondents 5 to 8 have been working in the said cadre as on date.3. in the light of the above, the learned counsel for the petitionerrequested for closure of the writ petition with liberty to the said three persons for whose benefits the present writ petition has been filed to workout their remedies, in case if they still got any further grievance.4. by duly placing on record the submissions made bymr.c.ramkumar, learned counsel appearing for the respondents 1 to 3, the writ petition is closed. no costs. connected miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. 31.01.2025 skr index : yes / nospeaking order / non-speaking orderneutral citation : yes / nomummineni sudheer kumar, j.skr to1. tamil nadu generation and distribution corporation, rep. by its chief engineer (personnel), new no.144, anna salai, chennai - 12.2. the chief engineer (general construction), vi floor, new no.144, anna salai, chennai - 2.3. the superintending engineer, general construction circle (salem), udayapatti, salem - 14.4. the labour officer, salem - 1. 31.01.2025

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 31.01.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR and M.P.Nos.1 and 2 of 2011 Central Organization of Tamil Nadu, Electricity Employees, Salem Electricity Distribution, Circle Branch, Rep. by its President, V.P.Chindn Ninaivagam, No.39-E-1, VPC Street, Cinema Nagar, Salem - 9. ... Petitioner Vs.

1. Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation, Rep. by its Chief Engineer (Personnel), New No.144, Anna Salai, Chennai - 12.

2. The Chief Engineer (General Construction), VI Floor, New No.144, Anna Salai, Chennai - 2.

3. The Superintending Engineer, General Construction Circle (Salem), Udayapatti, Salem - 14.

4. The Labour Officer, Salem - 1.

5. Thiru. R.Vasudevan

6. Thiru.T.Govindasamy

7. Thiru.E.Murugan

8. Thiru.A.Balu ... Respondents

Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for records pertaining to the order dated 10.10.2011 in Memo No.618/AdmI/A2/F.panel/2011 and the

order dated 25.10.2011 Ku.Aa.No.656/Ni.Pi.1/Thi.Vu.2/Koo.Promotion/

2011 passed by the third respondent quash the same and consequently direct the third respondent to include the names of Thiru.R.Thangaraj, Thiru.K.Munusamy and Thiru.S.Ponnusamy in the select list shown as Annexure - I to the order dated 10.10.2011 above the names of the respondents 5 to 8 and to promote them as Foreman Grade - I with all consequential benefits.

For Petitioner : Ms.G.K.Dharshini for Mr.V.Ajoy Khose For R1 to R3 : Mr.C.Ramkumar for Mr.P.R.Dhilip Kumar For R5, R7 & R8 : No appearance

For R6 : Dismissed vide court order

dated 30.08.2016

ORDER

This writ petition has been filed by an organization making a claim for promotion of some of its members over and above the Respondents 5 to 8.

2. This court has entertained a doubt about the maintainability of the

writ petition at the instance of an organization, especially considering the fact that the claim made is for promotion. However, it is brought to the notice of this court by Mr.C.Ramkumar, learned counsel appearing for the Respondents 1 to 3, that during the pendancy of the present writ petition, three members of the petitioners viz., Thiru.R.Thangaraj, Thiru.K.Munusamy and Thiru.Ponnusamy were already promoted to the post of 'Foreman Grade - I' and the said three persons as well as the Respondents 5 to 8 have been working in the said cadre as on date.

3. In the light of the above, the learned counsel for the petitioner

requested for closure of the writ petition with liberty to the said three persons for whose benefits the present writ petition has been filed to workout their remedies, in case if they still got any further grievance.

4. By duly placing on record the submissions made by

Mr.C.Ramkumar, learned counsel appearing for the Respondents 1 to 3, the writ petition is closed. No costs. Connected miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. 31.01.2025 skr Index : Yes / No

Speaking order / Non-speaking order

Neutral Citation : Yes / No

MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR, J.

skr To

1. Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation, Rep. by its Chief Engineer (Personnel), New No.144, Anna Salai, Chennai - 12.

2. The Chief Engineer (General Construction), VI Floor, New No.144, Anna Salai, Chennai - 2.

3. The Superintending Engineer, General Construction Circle (Salem), Udayapatti, Salem - 14.

4. The Labour Officer, Salem - 1. 31.01.2025

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial