Chennai Orders Court January 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Union of India Vs V Balamurugan
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-31-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 31-01-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE S.M. SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JOTHIRAMAN IN WP NO. 3425 OF 2025 Union of India Rep by the Secretary Ministry of Communications IT Department of Posts DakBhawan SansadMarg New Delhi 110 011 and 3 Others Petitioner(s) Vs V Balamurugan Teynampet chennai 600 018 and 2 OthersRespondent(s) For Petitioner(s): Sakthivel AR For Respondent(s): R. Malaichamy (caveat) C.Premkumar (caveat) T.Ramya (caveat) T.Ashok Raj (caveat) C.Dharmaraj (caveat) K.Vanishree (caveat)ORDER(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble S.m.Subramaniam J.) Dispensed with for the present. (S.M.SUBRAMANIAM J.) (M.JOTHIRAMAN J.) 31-01-2025 (2/3) sli To1. V Balamurugan Teynampet chennai 600 0182. The General Manager Postal Accounts Finance Tamil Nadu Circle No 4 Ethiraj Salai Chennai 600 0083. The Assistant Chief Accounts Officer O /o the General Manager Postal Accounts Finance Tamil Nadu Circle No 4 Ethiraj Sala...
S.Dhanasekaran vs the State Rep.by Its,the Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-31-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 31-01-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE S.M. SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JOTHIRAMAN S.Dhanasekaran S/o. Subramani, No.154, Sekkilar Street, Nanjampatty, Ammapet, Salem - 636 003. (now Confined At Central Prison, Salem) Appellant(s) Vs The State Rep.By Its,the Inspector Of Police, Ammapet Police Station, Salem - 636 003. Cr.No.482/2009. Respondent(s) For Appellant(s): Ms.K. Akshaya For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Rajakumar, Additional Public Prosecutor.ORDER(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble S.m.Subramaniam J.) In view of the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit filed in support of this miscellaneous petition to condone the delay of 236 days in filing the criminal appeal stands ordered.2. Registry is directed to number the criminal appeal, if it is otherwise in order. (S.M.SUBRAMANIAM J.) (M.JOTHIRAMAN J.) 31-01-2025 sli To1. The State Rep.By Its,the Inspector Of Police, Ammapet Police Station, Salem - 636 00...
Mahendran vs State by, the Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-31-2025
Crl.M.P.No.1608 of 2025 in Crl.A.SR.No.4962 of 2025SUNDER MOHAN, J.This petition is filed to condone the delay of 780 days in filing the appeal in Crl.A.Sr.No.4962 of 2025 against the conviction and sentence imposed on 07.10.2022 in Spl.C.C.No.2 of 2019 on the learned Sessions Judge Magalir Neethimandram (FTMC), Udhagamandalam, Nilgiris. 2.Heard the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side). 3.Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the delay stands condoned and the petition is ordered. 31.01.2025 Anu Note: Registry is directed to number the Criminal Appeal, if it is otherwise in order. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 1/1...
Union of India Vs G Ellappan
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-31-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 31-01-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE S.M. SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JOTHIRAMAN IN WP NO. 3227 OF 2025 Union of India rep by the Secretary Ministry of Communications and IT Department of Posts Dak Bhawan Sansad Marg New Delhi 110 011 and 4 Others Petitioner(s) Vs G Ellappan S/o.K.Gopal, No.24/25, Navalar Street, Rani Annanagar, Arumbakkam, Chennai - 600 106. Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s): Sakthivel AR For Respondent(s): R.MALAICHAMY(CAVEATOR) C.Premkumar (caveator) T.Ramya (caveator) T.Ashok Raj(caveator) C.Dharmaraj(caveator) K.Vanisree(caveator)ORDER(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble S.m.Subramaniam J.) Dispensed with for the present. (S.M.SUBRAMANIAM J.) (M.JOTHIRAMAN J.) 31-01-2025 (2/3) sli To1. G Ellappan S/o.K.Gopal, No.24/25, Navalar Street, Rani Annanagar, Arumbakkam, Chennai - 600 106....
M.Bensola vs Bibin Selvaraj Rennam
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-31-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 31.01.2025CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN Tr CMP.No.136 of 2024 & CMP.No.2781 of 2024 M.Bensola : PetitionerversusBibin Selvaraj Rennam : Respondent Prayer: Petition filed under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure to withdraw IDOP.No.364 of 2023 on the file of the Principal District Court at Thiruvallur and to transfer the same to the Sub Court at Alandur. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Selvakumar For Respondent : No appearanceORDERThis transfer seeks withdrawal of the IDOP.NO.364 of 2023 from the file of the Principal District Court at Tiruvallur and transfer the same to the file of the Sub Court, Alandur.2. I heard the counsel for the petitioner. I have gone through the affidavit.3. Though notice has been served on the respondent and his name isprinted in the cause list, there is no representation for him either in person or through counsel. Since the service has been completed, I took up the transfer petition for d...
Sundaram Finance Limited Vs Varsani Construction Co
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-31-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 31-01-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE P.B. BALAJIAND ARB APPLN NO. 280 OF 2025,ARB APPLN NO. 276 OF 2025,ARB APPLN NO. 277 OF 2025,ARB APPLN NO. 278 OF 2025,ARB APPLN NO. 279 OF 2025,ARB APPLN NO. 269 OF 2025,ARB APPLN NO. 270 OF 2025,ARB APPLN NO. 271 OF 2025,ARB APPLN NO. 272 OF 2025,ARB APPLN NO. 273 OF 2025,ARB APPLN NO. 274 OF 2025,ARB APPLN NO. 275 OF 2025,ARB APPLN NO. 186 OF 2025,ARB APPLN NO. 187 OF 2025,ARB APPLN NO. 188 OF 2025,ARB APPLN NO. 189 OF 2025A.No.185 of 2025 Sundaram Finance Limited No 21 Patullos Road Chennai Rep by its Manager Legal Mr Vyas Prakash Appellant(s) Vs Varsani Construction Co State Highway, Opp State Bank of India, Mankuwa, Bhuj, Kutch 370 030.No 21 Patullos Road Chennai Rep by its Manager Legal Mr Vyas Prakash and 2 Others Respondent(s) For Appellant(s): M/s.M.Arunachalam M.Nagalakshmi For Respondent(s):ORDERThese batches of applications have been filed by M/s. Sundaram Finance Company enjoying the ...
Sivakumar Vs The State Rep by, The Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-31-2025
CRL OP NO. 2309 of 2025IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 31-01-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN CRL OP NO. 2309 of 2025 Sivakumar S/o.Theethan, No.382, Puttumamanchi Tumbal Post, Athur Taluk, Salem District. Petitioner(s) Vs The State Rep by, The Inspector of Police, Mallasamudran Police Station, Namakkal. (Crime No. Not Known/2025). Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s): K Rahul K.Thenrajan V.Bharathidasan For Respondent(s): Public ProsecutorORDERToday, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent police submitted that the there is no petition or enquiry is pending against the petitioner.2. Recording the submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side), this Criminal Original Petition is closed. 31-01-2025 msv To The Inspector of Police, Mallasamudran Police Station,Namakkal. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
B Zunaitha Parveen Vs Deputy State Tax Officer II
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-31-2025
W.M.P.(MD). No. 3280 of 2025 in The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that there is a clerical error crept in the order passed in the writ petition in paragraph No.13. Paragraph No.13 has been mentioned as under:13. Even though the matter of seniority cannot be the subject of dispute once again before reverting one of the petitioners to a lower post, an opportunity could have been given to the petitioners. However, much water has flown under the bridge. Now, it is submitted that the next vacancies are going to arise on 01.05.2024 and petitioners herein, P.Muthuvel and Murugan will be accommodated therein.2. Now it is submitted by the respondent-Corporation thatMurugan was never reverted and it was Muthuvel who was reverted and who will get the benefit of the order. So far as Murugan is concerned, he has filed the writ petition to re-fix the seniority and the said relief has not been granted to him. Therefore, the learned counsel for the 2 nd respondent submitted that a clari...
Elamaran vs the Additional Chief Secretary to Govt
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-31-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 31.01.2025CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.JOTHIRAMAN Elamaran ... Petitioner Vs. Chennai. ... Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus, to call for the records in connection with the order of Detention passed by the second respondent, dated 02.12.2024, in Memo No.1190/BCDFGISSSV/2024 against the petitioner's son, namely, Nareshkumar, Male, aged 24 years, S/o.Illamaran, who is confined at Central Prison, Puzhal, Chennai and set aside the same and direct the respondents to produce the detenue before the Court and set him at liberty. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Senthilvel For Respondents : Mr.R.Muniyapparaj Additional Public ProsecutorORDER(Order of the Court was made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.) Mr.R.Muniyapparaj, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the respondents made a submission that the imp...
Lakshmi vs the State Rep by Its,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-31-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDated: 31.01.2025Coram:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN --- Lakshmi .. Petitioner Vs The Inspector of Police, (Cr.No.1201 of 2021) .. Respondent Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of the BNSS to grant necessary direction directing the III Additional District and Sessions Judge, Dharapuram to complete the trial in S.C.No.53 of 2022 within a time limit that may be fixed by this Court. For petitioner : Mr.T.Shunmuga Rajeswaran For respondents: Mr.S.Vinoth Kumar, Govt. Advocate (Crl. Side)ORDERThis petition is filed to grant necessary direction to III Additional District and Sessions Judge, Dharapuram to complete the trial in S.C.No.53 of 2022 within a time limit that may be fixed by this Court. Page No.1/42. In view of the direction of the Honourable Supreme Court andconsidering the fact that, since thousands of cases are pending in the Courts and the litigants are awaiting in a long queue, the Hon'ble Supreme Court in th...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »