Chennai Orders Court January 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Shanthi vs the State of Tamil Nadu, Rep by Its Additional Chief Secret ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 30.01.2025CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.JOTHIRAMAN H.C.P.No.43 of 2025 Shanthi ... Petitioner/Mother of the detenu Vs.1. The State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by its Additional Chief Secretary, Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, Secretariat complex, Chennai - 600 009.2. The Commissioner of Police, Office of Commissioner of Police, Chennai - 600 007.3. The Superintendent of Prisons, Special Prison for Women, Puzhal, Chennai - 600 066.4. The Inspector of Police, G-5, Secretariat Police Station, Chennai District. ... RespondentsPRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus, calling for the records relating to the detention order in 1231/BCDFGISSSV/2024 dated 12.12.2024 passed by the 2nd respondent under the Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982 and quash the same and direct the respondents to produce Sanjana@Sathishkumar, Transgender, aged...
Nussin vs the State of Tamil Nadu, Rep by Its
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 30.01.2025CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.JOTHIRAMAN H.C.P.No.36 of 2025 Nussin ... Petitioner/Wife of the detenu Vs.1. The State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by its Principal Secretary, Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, Secretariat Complex, Chennai - 600 009.2. The Commissioner of Police, Office of the Commissioner of Police, Chennai - 600 007.3. The Superintendent of Prisons, Central Prison, Puzhal, Chennai - 600 066.4. The Inspector of Police, D-2, Anna Salai Police Station, Chennai District. ... RespondentsPRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus,calling for the records relating to the detention order in 1207/BCFGISSSV/2024 dated 06.12.2024 passed by the second respondent under the Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982 and quash the same and direct the respondents to produce the detenu Manikandan @ Mani, aged 28 years, S/o. Stali...
Nagarajan vs the State Rep by Its, the Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2025
Crl.MP.No.1504 of 2025 in Crl.A.SR.No.572 of 2025S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.ANDM.JOTHIRAMAN, J.(Order of the Court was made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.) This miscellaneous petition has been filed to condone the delay of 63 days in filing the appeal against the conviction in SC.No.29/2023 on the file of the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Ariyalur dated 30.08.2024.2. Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit filed in support of the petition, delay is condoned and the this Miscellaneous Petition stands ordered. (S.M.S., J.) (M.J.R., J.) 30.01.2025 veda Note:Registry is directed to number the criminal appeal, if it is otherwise in order. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Selvi vs the Additional Chief Secretary to Government
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 30.01.2025CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.JOTHIRAMAN H.C.P.Nos.40 & 56 of 2025 and CMP.No.1302 of 2025 Selvi ... Petitioner in HCP.No.40 of 2025 Sureka ... Petitioner in HCP No.56 of 2025 Vs.1. The Additional Chief Secretary to Government, Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, Secretariat, Chennai - 600 009.2. The Commissioner of Police, Greater Chennai.3. The Superintendent of Prison, Central Prison, Puzhal, Chennai - 66.4. The Inspector of Police, Law and Order, H-8, Thiruvotriyur Police Station, Chennai. ... Respondents in both HCP'sPRAYER in HCP No.40 of 2025: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus, to call for the records in connection with the order of detention order passed by the second respondent dated 12.12.2024 in No.1243/BCDFGISSSV/2024 against the petitioner's son namely Dinesh Babu @ Pambu Dinesh, male...
M.Sakthivel vs the State Rep by
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 30.01.2025CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA M.Sakthivel S/o.Murugan, No.56, B-bajanai Koil Street, Kanchanakuppam, Ambattur, Tiruvallur, Chennai.600098. Appellant(s) Vs The State Rep By Chennai District. (crime No.116 Of 2024) Respondent(s) For Appellant(s): R. Ajith Kumar For Respondent(s): S.Santhosh Government Advocate (criminal Side),madras High Court.ORDERThis petition has been filed to relax the condition imposed on the petitioner that the petitioner shall report before the respondent police on daily at 06.30.p.m., until further orders.A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA.,J.Sma2. The Learned Govt. Advocate (Crl.Side) submitted that the petitioner has been regularly complying with the conditions imposed by this Court and the investigation is pending.3. Considering the submissions of both sides and the nature of offence, thecondition imposed on the petitioner in Crl.M.P.No.15079 of 2024 in Crl.O.P.No.20841 of 2024 dated 07.11...
Samundeswari vs the State of Tamil Nadu Rep.by Its Principal Secretary
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 30.01.2025CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.JOTHIRAMAN H.C.P.No.53 of 2025 Samundeswari ... Petitioner/Mother of the detenu Vs.1. The State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by its Principal Secretary, Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, Secretariat Complex, Chennai - 600 009.2. The Commissioner of Police, Office of Commissioner of Police, Chennai - 600 007.3. The Superintendent of Prisons, Central Prison, Puzhal, Chennai - 600 066.4. The Inspector of Police, G-3, Kilpauk Police Station, Chennai District. ... RespondentsPRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus, calling for the records relating to the detention order in 1216/BCDFGISSSV/2024 dated 11.12.2024 passed by the 2nd respondent under the Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982 and quash the same and direct the respondents to produce the detenu Rakeshkumar, aged 22 years, S/o. Janakiraman...
Vinod.C vs the Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-01-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA Vinod.C S/o.Channan, 89 Perumal Koil Street Mel Ayyapakkam Maduravoyal Thiruvallur-95. Appellant(s) Vs The Inspector Of Police, Respondent(s) For Appellant(s): R. Ajith Kumar For Respondent(s): S.Santhosh Government Advocate (criminal Side),madras High Court.ORDERThis petition has been filed to relax the condition imposed on the petitioner in Crl.M.P.No.16338 of 2024 in Crl.O.P.No.22940 of 2024 by an order dated 22.11.2024 passed by this Court to report before the respondent police on every Monday and Friday at 10.30 a.m., until further orders. A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA,J2. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) would submit that the petitioner hasbeen regularly complying with the condition imposed by this Court and investigation is pending in this matter. 3.Considering the submissions of both sides and the nature of offence, the condition imposed on the petitioner in Crl.M.P...
Manickam vs the District Collector
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2025
in and (Order of the Court was made by M.SUNDAR, J.,) This order will now dispose of the captioned 'Writ Miscellaneous Petition' [hereinafter 'WMP' for the sake of brevity].2. Captioned WMP has been filed under Rule 15 of 'Madras High Court Writ Rules, 2021' [hereinafter 'Writ Rules 2021' for the sake of convenience and brevity] with a prayer to file a single writ petition.3. Adverting to support affidavit, Mr.J.Shakul Hameed, learned counsel representing counsel on record for writ petitioners submits that the cause of action is common. and mk4. Therefore, accepting the above ground/reason, the captioned WMP is ordered as prayed for subject to petitioners paying or having paid separate Court fee. There shall be no order as to costs. [M.S.J.,] [K.R.S.J.,] 30.01.2025 (1/2) mk in...
Deepak Kumar vs State Rep by
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 30.01.2025CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA Deepak Kumar S/o.Mohanvel, No.4/108, Ramar Kovil Street, Athimakullapalli Villiage, Venkatsamuthiram Post, Tirupattur District Petitioner(s) Vs State Rep By Thirupattur District, Crime No.773 Of 2024 Respondent(s) For Appellant(s): T.Muruganantham M.Rajkumar M.Praveen V.Vivek For Respondent(s): S.Santhosh Government Advocate (criminal Side),madras High Court.ORDERThis petition has been filed to relax the condition imposed on the petitioner that the petitioner should report before the respondent police on everyday at 10.30.a.m., until further orders.A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA.,J.Sma2. The Learned Govt. Advocate (Crl.Side) submitted that the petitioner has been regularly complying with the conditions imposed by this Court and the investigation is pending.3. Considering the submissions of both sides and the nature of offence, thecondition imposed on the petitioner in Crl.O.P.No.28...
Murugan vs the State Rep by Its,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 30.01.2025CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA MURUGAN S/o.Venkattapa, No.211/4, Podur, Kottaiyur, Denkanikottai, Krishnagiri 635 102. Appellant(s) Vs The State Rep By Its, Respondent(s) For Appellant(s): K.Vasantanayagan L.Ramanathan R.Reshma For Respondent(s): S.Santhosh Government Advocate (criminal Side),madras High Court.ORDERThis petition has been filed to relax the condition imposed on the petitioner that the petitioner should report before the respondent police until further orers.A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA.,J.Sma2. The Learned Govt. Advocate (Crl.Side) submitted that the petitioner has been regularly complying with the conditions imposed by this Court and the investigation is pending.3. Considering the submissions of both sides and the nature of offence, thecondition imposed on the petitioner in Crl.M.P.No.16508 of 2024 in Crl.O.P.No.26998 of 2024 dated 26.11.2024, is modified to the effect that the petitioner shal...
- ‹ Prev
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- Next ›
- Last »