Andhra Pradesh Court July 2012 Judgments

Smt. Shaheen Parveen Vs. the State of A.P., Rep. by the District Colle ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2012(5)ALD649

(Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in canceling petitioner’s authorization in respect of Fair Price Shop Dealership of Shop No.21 of Emboora (V) Madnoor (M) of Nizamabad District vide Proceedings No.A1/2499/2012 dated 10-07-2012 without conducting any enquiry as being arbitrary, illegal, opposed to principles of Natural Justice, violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India and contrary to the provisions of the A.P. State Public Distribution (Control) Order, 2008 and consequently direct the respondents 1 to 4 to restore petitioner’s authorization in respect of Shop No.21 of Emboora (V) Madnoor Mandal of Nizamabad District.) This Writ Petition is filed for a Mandamus to declare the action of respondent No.3 in canceling...

Smt. Kauser Khan Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by Its ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

(Prayer: Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any appropriate writ order or direction preferably one in the nature of writ of Certiorari, calling for the records in proceedings No.HW/-3/Arms /971-Banjara Hills/06 dt. 11-10-2006 issued by the 2nd respondent has confirmed by the proceedings of the 1st respondent Vide Memo No. 31508/Arms /2006 dt. 12-2-2007 and to quash both the orders as being illegal, arbitrary, violative of the Article 14 of the constitution of India as well as being violative of the provisions of the Arms Act 1959 and the Rules made thereunder and consequently direct the respondents to fourthwith permit the petitioner to purchase N.P.Bore Pistol in lieu of the lost weapon in connection with F.I.R. No. 741/2002 dt. 14-11-2002 on the file of the Banjara Hills Police,. Hyderabad and also to direct the respondents to forthwith renew the lice...

Smt. Kauser Khan Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh, Represente

Court: Andhra Pradesh

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE G.CHANDRAIAH W.P.NO.10113 OF 200.and 836 o25. 07.2012 SMT. KAUSER KHAN GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT AND TWO OTHERS. Counsel for the petitioner: SRI NASIR AHMED KHAN Counsel for the respondents: G.P. FOR HOME ?Cases Referred:1. 2010(4) ALT 37.:COMMON ORDER As parties in both the writ petitions are one and the same and the issue is connected, they are being disposed of by this common order.2. The petitioner in both the writ petitions is one Smt. Kauser Khan. The case of the petitioner is that herself and her family members, including her husband, are involved in business and that her husband moves globally for business purposes. For self protection and security, she requires weapon and accordingly based on her application, the licensing authority granted licence bearing no.112/24 dated 28.3.1983, re-registered as 971/Banjara Hills for possessing (1) .25 NPB pistol and (2) .22 NPB Rifle, which licence was ren...

Sri S.Madhusudhan and Others Vs. the Revenue Divisional Officer and Ot ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.3486 OF 201.25.07.2012 Sri S.Madhusudhan and others The Revenue Divisional Officer and others. Counsel for petitioners: Sri S.Niranjan Reddy Counsel for Respondents : GP for REvenue HEAD NOTE: ?Cases referred ORDER: The respective fathers of the petitioners herein are said to have purchased different extents of land, aggregating to 92 acres in survey Nos.668 to 673 and 679 of Gundlapochampally Village, Medchal Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, from the owners thereof through unregistered documents, in the year 1975. It is stated that the petitioners, or their fathers, as the case may be, have initiated proceedings under Section 5-A of the A.P. Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act, 1971 (for short 'the Act'), for validation of the unregistered sale deeds. Orders are said to have been passed in the year 2000, as regards the individual sale transactions, duly collecting the stamp duty. Pattdar pass books and title deeds are issue...

M.Balaram Vs. State of A.P. Rep. by Pubic Prosecutor,

Court: Andhra Pradesh

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1090 o25. 07.2012 M.Balaram State of A.P. rep. By Pubic Prosecutor, High Court, Hyderabad ACB Cases GIST HEAD NOTE: Counsel for Appellants: Mr. Poorna Chandra Reddy representing Smt D.Sangeetha Reddy Counsel for Respondent: Special Public Prosecutor for ACB ?CASES REFERRED:1. 2010 (4) SCC 45.2 AIR 200.SC 2011(11966. (3) SCR 73.JUDGMENT: This Criminal Appeal arises out of the judgment in C.C.No.10 of 1995 dated 30.06.2005 passed by the Principal Special Judge for SPE & ACB Cases-cum-IV Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad. The first appellant-A.1 is the father of the second appellant-A.2. The first appellant was a Senior Checking Inspector in the Civil Supplies Department at the relevant time. PW.1 was a fair price shop dealer. The indictment was that A.1 demanded PW.1 an amount of Rs.300/- for doing official favour, received the same and was caught by the DSP, ACB and his team when a trap was laid against him. A...

Anireddy Venkat Reddy Vs. Kolanu Sreenivasulu, District Secretary of N ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Smt. M. Shreesha, Honble Member Aggrieved by the order in C.C.No.02/2010 on the file of District Forum, Nalgonda, opposite party preferred this appeal. The brief facts as set out in the complaint are that the consumer namely, Rabolu Satyanarayana, purchased a Nokia mobile phone model N-73 for Rs.12,500/- from opposite party No.1 on 22-8-2008. The consumer submits that the mobile was defective from the very next day and the telephone number of the customer care office also belongs to same opposite party No.1 and this is found printed on his visiting card i.e. 9948159009, so the consumer submits that the dealer and customer care office is one and the same. The defacto complainant is representing the consumer and when a complaint was made, the opposite party delivered another mobile on 23-4-2009 and the replaced mobile was also defective and was immediately handed over to the opposite party. The complainant submits that when the second mobile was taken for repairs, it was serviced by one ...

Syed Abdul Moiz Vs. State of A.P., Rep., by Inspector of Police, Acb, ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

This appeal is filed against the judgment dated 16.07.2005 passed by the Principal Special Judge for SPE and ACB Cases-cum-IV Additional Chief Judge, City  Civil Court, Hyderabad (for short 'the trial Court') in C.C.No.19 of 1996. The appellant was convicted by the trial Court for the charges under Section 7 and Section 13(1)(d) and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (for short 'the Act'). For the conviction under Section 7 of the Act, the appellant was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year and to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/-. He was further sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of two years for the offence under Section 13(1)(d) punishable under Section 13(2) of the Act and also to pay a fine of Rs.2,000/-. Challenging the said order of conviction and sentence, the appellant preferred the present appeal. 2. The brief facts giving rise to filing of the present appeal may be stated as follows:- The appellant was working as As...

Dontharaboina Sadanandam and Others Vs. State Rep by the Sub Divisiona ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Aggrieved by the judgment, dated 12.8.2005 passed by the learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Karimnagar in S.C.No:308 of 2005 convicting the appellants and sentenced them to undergo R.I. for (7) years each and to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/- each in default to suffer S.I. for two (2) months for the offence under section 304-B IPC and further convicted and sentenced to undergo R.I. for a period of two (2) years each and to pay a fine of Rs.500/- in default to suffer S.I. for 1 (1) month for the offence under section 498-A I.P.C and further convicted and sentenced to undergo R.I. for two (2) years each and sentenced to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/- each in default to suffer S.I. for two (2) months for the offence under section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act and further convicted and sentenced to undergo R.I. for five (5) years and to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/- each in default to suffer S.I. for one (1) month for the offence under section 306 I.P.C., the present appeal is filed by the appellants. The...

Syed Abdul Moiz Vs. State of A.P., Rep., by Inspector of Pol

Court: Andhra Pradesh

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R. KANTHA RAO CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1147 of 2005. 24.07.2012 Syed Abdul Moiz State of A.P., rep., by Inspector of Police,ACB, Nizamabad Range, rep., by Spl.Public ProsecutorFor ACB cases, High Court, Hyderabad. Counsel for the Appellant: Sri T. Bali Reddy representing Sri R.Balakrishna Rao Counsel for Respondent: Spl. Public Prosecutor for ACB Cases : : ?Cases referred: JUDGMENT: This appeal is filed against the judgment dated 16.07.2005 passed by the Principal Special Judge for SPE & ACB Cases-cum-IV Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad (for short 'the trial Court') in C.C.No.19 of 1996. The appellant was convicted by the trial Court for the charges under Section 7 and Section 13(1)(d) and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (for short 'the Act'). For the conviction under Section 7 of the Act, the appellant was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year and to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/-. He was further sentence...

Akula Bhoomaiah and Another Vs. the State of A.P., Rep. by Public Pros ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

(Prayers: Petition Under Section 482 of Cr.P.C of the Crl.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of grounds filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings of Crime No. 47 of 2012 of P.S., Khanapur, Warangal District, against the petitioners in the interest of justice. The Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of grounds filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of Sir Balla Ravindranath and Savitri Devi, Advocates for the petitioners and of the Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondents.) The petitioners 1 and 2/A.9 and A.10 are accused of offences punishable under Sections 16, 17, 18, 18-B, 19, 20, 38, 39 and 40 of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 (in short, the Act) and Section 120B IPC along with 8 others. It is alleged that when Inspector of Police, Gudur Circle on 09.06.2012 at about 5:30 hours was conducting vehicle checking along with other Police Officers and perso...