Andhra Pradesh Court July 2012 Judgments

Kothappalle Nageshwara Rao Vs. State of A.P. Rep.by Its Public Prosecu ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

1. This appeal arises out of the judgment dated 30.06.2005 passed by the Special Judge for SPE and ACB Cases, Vijayawada in C.C.No.1 of 1999. 2. The appellant was tried by the learned Special Judge for the offences under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with 13 (2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, was found guilty of the said offences and was convicted and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year and also to pay fine of Rs.1,000/- for the offence under Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and was further sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year and to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/- for the offence under Section 13(1)(d) read with 13 (2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The substantive sentences were directed to run concurrently. Challenging the said order of conviction and sentence, the present appeal is filed by the appellant. 3. The brief facts essential for disposing of the present appeal may be stated as...

Dr. K. Satyanarayana Reddy Vs. State of A.P. Rep. by Inspector of Poli ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

(Prayer: Criminal Appeal under Section 374 (2) Cr.P.C. against the judgment dated 11-02-2005 in CC No. 29 of 1994 on the file of the court of the Principal Special Judge for SPE and ACB Cases-cum-IV Additional Chief Judge, CityCivil Court, Hyderaba.) 1. This appeal is preferred by the sole accused-appellant against the judgmentdated 11.02.2005 passed by the Principal Special Judge for SPE and ACB Cases-cum-IV Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad in C.C.No. 29 of 1994. 2.The appellant-sole accused was tried by the learned Principal SpecialJudge for SPE and ACB Cases, Hyderabad for the charges under Sections 7 and13(1)(d)(i) r/w Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act (for short'the Act'), was convicted for the said offences and sentenced to undergorigorous imprisonment for a period of one year for the charge under Section 7 ofthe Act and also to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/-, he was further sentenced toundergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of two years for the c...

Alok Kumar Sharma Vs. Smt. T. Hemalatha

Court: Andhra Pradesh

(Prayer: Appeal under Section 100 of CPC against the Decree in A.S.No.98 of 2008 dated 30-11-2010 on the file of the Court of the XI Additional Chief Judge (F.T.C), City Civil Court, Hyderabad preferred against the decree in O.S.No.2078 of 2006 dt.3-3-2008 on the file of the court of the X Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad.) 01. The defendant in O.S.No.2078 of 2006 on the file of the court of X Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad is the appellant herein. 02. The suit was one filed for eviction of the defendant from the suit schedule property. The allegations in the plaint goes to show that the defendant is the tenant of the plaintiff, which is a residential building, on a monthly rent of Rs.5000/- per month from October-2003 for a period of two years initially. There was also an agreement for enhancing the rent @ 10% for every two years. The defendant was irregular in payment of the rents and in spite of repeated demands and also a notice, he did not pay the m...

Gonguluri Srinivasa Sharma and Another Vs. the Government of A.P. and ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2012(5)ALD771

The land admeasuring about Acs.25.00 in different Survey Numbers of Bhagyath Village, Uppal Mandal, Ranga Reddy District was owned by one Mr.Gonguluri Ramakishtaiah, the grand father of the petitioners herein. He filed a declaration under Section 6 of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 (for short ‘the Act’). When the declaration was under process, Ramakishtaiah died on 08.01.1991. Obviously not being aware of the death of the declarant, the Special Officer and Competent Authority, 2nd respondent herein passed an order dated 25.02.1991 holding that the declarant possesses the land in excess of ceiling limits. The petitioners state that they succeeded to the estate of Ramakishtaiah. The Government issued notification under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act on 05.07.2006 proposing to acquire the land admeasuring Ac.4.25 guntas in Survey Nos.326 and 329. Declaration under Section 6 of that Act was also issued. The petitioners participated in the award of e...

Mohammad Saleem Vs. the State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by Public Prosec ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

(Prayer: Petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. praying that in the circumstances stated in the Petition filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to quash the FIR registered as Crime No.55 of 2012 on the file of Station House Officer, Huzurabad, Karimnagar District.) The petitioner is accused of offences punishable under Sections 290, 323 I.P.C and Section 3(1)(x) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (in short, the Act). The 2nd respondent gave report to the police on the basis of which the police issued F.I.R in this case against the petitioner. It is alleged that on 30.03.2012 at about 8.00 A.M in the temporary absence of her husband in the house, the accused who is residing at some distance from her house came to a vacant site near her house and called her as Erukula bitch and questioned her as to why she reported to her master about the accused being responsible for burning of motor because of washing of clothes by him. It is furth...

Mohammad Saleem Vs. the State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by Pub

Court: Andhra Pradesh

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU CRIMINAL PETITION No.5519 o30. 07-2012 Mohammad Saleem The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by Public Prosecutor & another Counsel for the Petitioner : Mr.C.Ramesh Sagar Counsel for the Respondent: Public Prosecutor : : Cases referred:2009. Cri.L.J 383.ORDER : The petitioner is accused of offences punishable under Sections 290, 323 I.P.C and Section 3(1)(x) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (in short, the Act). The 2nd respondent gave report to the police on the basis of which the police issued F.I.R in this case against the petitioner. It is alleged that on 30.03.2012 at about 8.00 A.M in the temporary absence of her husband in the house, the accused who is residing at some distance from her house came to a vacant site near her house and called her as Erukula bitch and questioned her as to why she reported to her master about the accused being responsible for burning of motor becaus...

Gonguluri Srinivasa Sharma and Another. Vs. the Government of A.P. and ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY Writ Petition No.28883 o30. 07.2012 Gonguluri Srinivasa Sharma and another. The Government of A.P. and others. Counsel for the Petitioners : Sri P.Sri Raghuram Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1&2: G.P. for Revenue ^Counsel for the Respondent No.3 : Sri Y.Ravindra : : ?Cases Referred: ORDER: The land admeasuring about Acs.25.00 in different Survey Numbers of Bhagyath Village, Uppal Mandal, Ranga Reddy District was owned by one Mr.Gonguluri Ramakishtaiah, the grand father of the petitioners herein. He filed a declaration under Section 6 of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 (for short 'the Act'). When the declaration was under process, Ramakishtaiah died on 08.01.1991. Obviously not being aware of the death of the declarant, the Special Officer and Competent Authority, 2nd respondent herein passed an order dated 25.02.1991 holding that the declarant possesses the land in excess of ceiling limits. The petitioners state that th...

B.Yadagiri Vs. District Collector, Nalgonda and Others.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.17648 OF 201.30.07.2012 B.Yadagiri District Collector, Nalgonda and others. Counsel for petitioner: Sri G.Purushotham Reddy Counsel for Respondents : GP for Revenue HEAD NOTE: ?Cases referred ORDER: The petitioner owns Acs.4.30 guntas of land in different survey numbers of Kasarlapahad Village, Jagireddygudem Mandal, Nalgonda District. The common well, in which, the petitioner and the 4th respondent have 25% share, each, and one Laxmaiah has 50% share, is a source of irrigation. The petitioner sunk a bore-well, in his land, in survey No.172, in January, 2012, on finding that the water that falls towards his share from the common well, is not sufficient to irrigate his land. The 4th respondent submitted a complaint, against the petitioner, to the Tahasildar, Jagireddygudem Mandal, the 2nd respondent herein, under the A.P. Water, Land and Trees Act, 2002 (for short 'the Act') and the Rules made thereunder (for short 'the Rules'). ...

Kothappalle Nageshwara Rao Vs. State of A.P. Rep.by Its Public Prosecu ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R. KANTHA RAO CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1095 OF 200.30.07.2012 Kothappalle Nageshwara Rao State of A.P. Rep.by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P. Hyderabad. Counsel for the Appellant : Sri C.Padmanabha Reddy Counsel for respondent: Sri Sri Ghania Moosa, Spl.PP for ACB HEAD NOTE: Cases referred:1. AIR 196.AP 105(VOL.52, c.31)(12004. CRL.L.J620 JUDGMENT: This appeal arises out of the judgment dated 30.06.2005 passed by the Special Judge for SPE and ACB Cases, Vijayawada in C.C.No.1 of 1999.2. The appellant was tried by the learned Special Judge for the offences under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with 13 (2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, was found guilty of the said offences and was convicted and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year and also to pay fine of Rs.1,000/- for the offence under Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and was further sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year...

Dr.K.Satyanarayana Reddy Vs. State of A.P. Rep. by Inspector of Polic

Court: Andhra Pradesh

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R. KANTHA RAO Criminal Appeal No.157 o30. 07.2012 Dr.K.Satyanarayana Reddy State of A.P. rep. by Inspector of Police, ACB,Karimnagar Counsel for the appellant : Sri R.Ramachandra Reddy, Standing Counsel for ACB Cases. Counsel for respondent : Mrs.D.Sangeetha Reddy GIST: HEAD NOTE: Cases referred: JUDGMENT: This appeal is preferred by the sole accused-appellant against the judgment dated 11.02.2005 passed by the Principal Special Judge for SPE & ACB Cases-cum- IV Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad in C.C.No. 29 of 1994.2. The appellant-sole accused was tried by the learned Principal Special Judge for SPE & ACB Cases, Hyderabad for the charges under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d)(i) r/w Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act (for short 'the Act'), was convicted for the said offences and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year for the charge under Section 7 of the Act and also to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/-, he ...