Andhra Pradesh Court July 2012 Judgments

Shareef Abdul Raheem Yamani and Others Vs. the State of A.P., Rep by P ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

(Prayer: Petition under Section 482 of the Crl.P.C. praying that in the circumstances stated in the Petition filed therewith, the High Court will be pleased to call for the record relating to the Crime No.185 of 2012 on the file of P.S., Mir Chowk, Hyderabad and quash the proceedings therein.) The petitioners 1 to 3/A.1 to A.3 are accused of offence punishable under Section 295A/34 IPC in Cr.No.185 of 2012 of Mirchowk Police Station, Hyderabad. A.1 is Chairman of Ruby Channel, formerly known as Ruby City Cable Entertainment and News Channel at Hyderabad. A.2 is Managing Director and A.3 is Video Editor in the said channel. It is alleged that A.1 instructed A.2 in the presence of A.3 to telecast one Islamic programme by name Pygamber Hazrath Yousuf A.S., and instructed them to download the programme from www.youtube.com and that on 17.06.2012, A.2 instructed A.3 to download the clips and to telecast the same at 22.00 hours and that A.3 downloaded the said programme part 1 of 146 from Yo...

Shareef Abdul Raheem Yamani and Others Vs. the State of A.P., Rep by P ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU CRIMINAL PETITION No.5433 o23. 07.2012 Shareef Abdul Raheem Yamani and others The State of A.P., rep by Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P.,And another Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri M.A.K.Mukheed Counsel for the Respondents: Additional Public Prosecutor : : Cases referred:1. 2006 CRI.L.J.368 ORDER: The petitioners 1 to 3/A.1 to A.3 are accused of offence punishable under Section 295A/34 IPC in Cr.No.185 of 2012 of Mirchowk Police Station, Hyderabad. A.1 is Chairman of Ruby Channel, formerly known as Ruby City Cable Entertainment & News Channel at Hyderabad. A.2 is Managing Director and A.3 is Video Editor in the said channel. It is alleged that A.1 instructed A.2 in the presence of A.3 to telecast one Islamic programme by name Pygamber Hazrath Yousuf A.S., and instructed them to download the programme from www.youtube.com and that on 17.06.2012, A.2 instructed A.3 to download the clips and to telecast the same at 22.00 hours and tha...

Akula Bhoomaiah and Another Vs. the State of A.P., Rep. by Public Pros ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU CRIMINAL PETITION No.5293 o23. 07.2012 Akula Bhoomaiah and another The State of A.P., rep. by Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P. and others Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri Balla Ravindranath Counsel for the Respondents: Additional Public Prosecutor : Cases referred:1. AIR 195.Supreme Court 366 (1) 2. AIR 196.Supreme Court 119 ORDER: The petitioners 1 and 2/A.9 and A.10 are accused of offences punishable under Sections 16, 17, 18, 18-B, 19, 20, 38, 39 and 40 of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 (in short, the Act) and Section 120B IPC along with 8 others. It is alleged that when Inspector of Police, Gudur Circle on 09.06.2012 at about 5:30 hours was conducting vehicle checking along with other Police Officers and personnel near Petrol Bunk at Khanapur outskirts in view of Parkal Bye-elections, he received phone call from Inspector of Police, Narsampet Circle informing about a maroon colour Qualis Vehicle bearing not AP12C 437....

Dontharaboina Sadanandam and Others Vs. State Rep by the Sub Divisiona ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.S.APPARAO CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1342 OF 200.23-07-2012 DONTHARABOINA SADANANDAM & OTHERS STATE REP BY THE SUB DIVISIONAL POLICE OFFICER and ANOTHER Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri T.K. Sridhar Counsel for the Respondents: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR. HEAD NOTE: Cases referred 1) (2006) 9 SCC 467. ORDER: Aggrieved by the judgment, dated 12.8.2005 passed by the learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Karimnagar in S.C.No:308 of 2005 convicting the appellants and sentenced them to undergo R.I. for (7) years each and to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/- each in default to suffer S.I. for two (2) months for the offence under section 304-B IPC and further convicted and sentenced to undergo R.I. for a period of two (2) years each and to pay a fine of Rs.500/- in default to suffer S.I. for 1 (1) month for the offence under section 498-A I.P.C and further convicted and sentenced to undergo R.I. for two (2) years each and sentenced to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/- each in default to suffer...

Sundaram Bnp Paribas Home Finance Limited Represented by Its Authorize ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Smt. M. Shreesha, Honble Member. Aggrieved by the order in C.C.No.177/2009 on the file of District Forum-II, Krishna at Vijayawada, Opposite Parties preferred this appeal. The brief facts as stated in the complaint are that the complainants husband availed a loan of Rs.14,36,464/- from opposite parties 1 and 2 on 31-8-2008 to which the complainant is the co-borrower. The complainant submitted that at the time of disbursement of loan, the opposite parties informed the late husband of the complainant to obtain SBI Policy and he accordingly agreed and paid a premium of Rs.36,464/- in lumpsum to the opposite party No.3 and received the balance of the loan from the opposite parties 1 and 2. The complainant submitted that during his life time submitted that her husband during his life time requested opposite party No.1 to deliver the original policy certificate given by opposite party no.3 and he was asked to wait and therefore they were under the bonafide impression that their proposal for ...

Venkat Ram Reddy Reddygari and Another Vs. Arikala Narsa Reddy and Oth ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2012(5)ALT499

(Petition under Section 80, 80A, 81, 83, 84, 100(1)(d) and 101 of Representation of the People Act, 1951 and the Rules made there under Read With Rules to Regulate the Trial of Election Petitions under the Representation issued by the High Court of Andhra Pradesh, praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court will be pleased to - a) Declare the Election of respondent No.1 to the Legislative Council 18-Nizamabad Local Authority Constituency, Nizamabad held on 30-03-2009 as illegal and void; b) Direct Recounting and scrutiny of the ballot papers and validate three votes cast in favour of the petitioner; c) Declare one vote caste in favour of the respondent No.1 as invalid; d) To set aside the Election of the 1st respondent as the member of the Legislative Council from 18-Nizamabad Local Authority Constituency; e) To declare the petitioner as elected to the Legislative Council of the State of A.P., from 18 Nizamabad Local Authority Constit...

E. Giri Yadav Vs. Union of India, Rep. by Cabinet Secretary, Central S ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

(Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the failure of the Union of India in discharging its Constitutional duties under Articles 355 and 356 of the Constitution of India though there is a constitutional breakdown in the State of Andhra Pradesh as illegal, unjust, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently direct the Union of India to invoke, exercise and discharge its Constitutional duties by discharging and exercising its constitutional duties and functions under Articles 355 and 356 of the Constitution of India by imposing President’s Rule in the State of Andhra Pradesh forthwith.)  Common Order: (Vilas V. Afzulpukar, J.) We have heard Mr. S. Ramachandra Rao at length. 2. The reliefs sought for in these public interest litigations may be noticed as unde...

United India Insurance Co. Ltd., Rep. by Its Branch Manager, Branch Of ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

1. The 2nd respondent-insurer in O.P.No.917 of 2000 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal cum District Judge, Nizamabad (the Tribunal, for short), preferred the present appeal assailing the award granting compensation at Rs.3,41,000/- together with interest at 9% per annum from the date of the petition till deposit in favour of the sole petitioner before the Tribunal. 2. The petitioner before the Tribunal is the 1st respondent herein. The 1st respondent before the Tribunal is arrayed as the 2nd respondent. The 1st respondent filed a petition under Section 166(1)(a) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (the M.V.Act, for short) claiming compensation at Rs.10,00,000/-. It is the case of the 1st respondent that on 10-4-1999 he was travelling in lorry bearing registration No.ATT-1875 owned by the 2nd respondent-insured with the appellant as a cleaner. At about 2.00 p.m., when the driver of the lorry drove the lorry in a rash and negligent manner, the lorry turned turtle near Jeevadan...

M. Balaswamy Vs. Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation Rep. ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

(Prayers: Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order, or Direction more particularly one in nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the order passed by the third Respondent in proc.No.02/95 (88)/96-WNP, dated 9.12.1996, and confirmed by the second Respondent in proc.No.PA/20(60)/97-DY CTM-MB, dated. 29.5.1997 as illegal, unjust, contrary to law, in violation or principles of Natural Justice and also in violation of Article 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and grant all consequential benefits. WPMP NO. 18512 OF 2000:- Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order passed by the Third Respondent in Proc. No. 02/95 (88)/96-WNP, dated. 9.12.1996, confirmed by the second Respondent in Proc.No...

K. Malla Reddy Vs. the Authority Under Sec.48 of Ap Shops Establishmen ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

ORDER: Sri N.V.Malleshwar Rao, respondent No.3 herein, filed A.P. Shops and Establishments Case No.7 of 1996 before the Authority under Section 48 of the Shops and Establishments Act (for short ‘the Act’) and the Assistant Commissioner of Labour, Eluru, West Godavari District against Sri Kothamasu Badrinarayana, respondent No.4 herein, and the petitioner herein. He pleaded that he has been working as Clerk since 10 years prior to filing of the case in M/s. ANL Parcel Service, Hyderabad and that on 12.06.1995, the petitioner herein, who is working as Field Assistant and respondent No.4, Agent to M/s. ANL Parcel Service, have terminated his services without any reason. He prayed that necessary action be taken against his illegal termination and orders be passed for reinstatement with back wages. Respondent No.4 opposed the case by stating that he is only an Agent of M/s. ANL Parcel Service. He denied the existence of relationship of employer and employee between himself and r...