Andhra Pradesh Court July 2012 Judgments

B.Srinivas Vs. the Deputy Commissioner of Endowments and Executive Off ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

The matter was listed before this Court for admission. However, arguments were advanced by the learned counsel traversing the gamut of the case. As the pleadings are also complete, the writ petition itself is taken up for disposal with the consent of the learned counsel. The short question that arises for consideration in this case is whether Sri Anjaneya Swamy Devasthanam, Kondagattu, Karimnagar District, the first respondent temple, is the parent institution of the petitioner for the purpose of reckoning his seniority and for promotion? The petitioner was initially appointed on 01.06.1989 as a Junior Assistant in Sri Hanuman Temple, Huzurabad Town, Karimnagar District, on a consolidated pay, under the order dated 31.05.1989 of the Single Trustee of the temple. He was transferred to the first respondent temple under proceedings dated 07.12.1989 of the Deputy Commissioner, Endowments Department, Hyderabad, and joined as a Junior Assistant in its service on 08.12.1989. He was extended t...

M/S. Bhel (Randd) Employees Cooperative Housing Society Limited, Vikas ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Challenge in this Writ Petition is to the proceedings of the Special Officer and Competent Authority, Urban Land Ceiling, Hyderabad-1st respondent in C.C.No.G1/629/2007, issued under Sections 8, 9 and 10 of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976, (for short, ‘the Act’) including the panchanama, dated 11.02.2008 and also instructions under the Memo. No.1271/G1/10, dated 15.04.2010, addressed to the Sub-Registrar, Quthbullapur, Ranga Reddy District-2nd respondent. 2. Background facts, in a nutshell, leading to filing of this Writ Petition by M/s.BHEL (RandD) Employees’ Cooperative Housing Society Limited (hereinafter referred to as ‘the petitioner-Society’), are: The petitioner-M/s.BHEL (RandD) Employees’ Cooperative Housing Society Limited is a Society registered under the provisions of A.P. Cooperative Societies Act, 1964, in the year 1976. The object of the Society is to secure house plots to all eligible members, who are employees of BHE...

Anil Agarwal and Others Vs. Hindusthan Petroleum Corporation Ltd, Rep. ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2012(5)ALD357; 2012(5)ALT546

(Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more appropriately a writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 1st respondent herein in abruptly withholding supply of petroleum products to the petitioner dealer from 1-4-2012 and removed petrol supply pump on the untenable ground that the petitioner ceased to have rights over the suit property from the date of decree in S.A.No.1192 of 2011 Dt/- 9-9-2011 on the file of the Hon'ble High Court; that the petitioner is not a dealer under a agreement dt/- 16-8-2006 and contrary to the right of restitution of petitioner in law pursuant to the order of the executing court Dt/- 12-4-2012 and illegal, without jurisdiction and vitiated and contrary to the principles of  natural justice and issue any other appropriate writ order or direction in the interest of justice.) Common Judgment: The rev...

K. Swamy Reddy and Others Vs. the Revenue Divisional Officer and Other ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

(Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction, more appropriately a writ of Certiorari calling for the records relating to passing of the Award No.1/2011 dated 12-2-2011 and quash the same declaring illegal and also direct to hold section 5A enquiry.) The Power Grid Corporation of India Limited, Secunderabad, the 3rd respondent herein, proposed to construct a 765/400 K.V. Substation at Orvakal Village, Kurnool. About Acs.80.00 of land was needed. A notification under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short ‘the Act’) was published on 22.07.2010, proposing to acquire the lands of the petitioners herein in different survey numbers of Orvakal Village and Mandal. Having regard to the urgency involved in the matter, enquiry under Section 5-A of the Act was dispensed with, by invoking powers under Section 17(4)...

M. Trilok Singh and Another Vs. the Government of Andhra Pradesh Repre ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

The petitioners are the owners of about Ac.1.00 of land in T.S.Nos.11, 12, 13/2, 13/3 and 14/2 of Lingampally Revenue Village, Himayathnagar Mandal, Hyderabad.  It abuts a nala running from Hussain sagar to Moosi.  The then Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad initiated steps to widen the nala.  The land of the petitioners to a substantial extent viz., 3500 sq. yards was going to be affected.  Complaining that they are sought to be dispossessed by the Corporation without initiating proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short ‘the Act’), the petitioners filed O.S.1229 of 1994 in the Court of II Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad.  The said suit was decreed on 31.12.1998. A notification under Section 4(1) of the Act dated 10.09.2007 was published by the District Collector, Hyderabad, the second respondent herein.  This was followed by publication of declaration under Section 6 of the Act on 02.03.1998. The petitioners d...