Andhra Pradesh Court July 2012 Judgments

Pallapu Raju @ Pedda Raju, Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by Its Pu ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.RAMANA AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P. DURGA PRASAD CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1017 o14. 07-2012 Pallapu Raju @ Pedda Raju, State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad. Counsel for the Appellant: Sri Nimmagadda Satyanarayana, Advocate. Counsel for the Respondent : Public Prosecutor : Cases referred:1. AIR 199.SC 322.2. 2005 SCC (Cri3. 2001 (1) ALD (Crl.) 620 (SC) JUDGMENT: (per the Hon'ble Sri Justice P.Durga Prasad) This appeal is directed against the conviction and sentence passed in S.C.No.355 of 2007 by the Sessions Judge, Prakasam District at Ongole on 16.06.2008. The appellant is the sole accused and he was prosecuted for the offence under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short "IPC"). According to the prosecution, the accused married the deceased Pallapu Venkata Ramana about five years back and they blessed with a male child and two female children and the accused is a mason by prof...

Khandavalli Amith Kumar Vs. State of A.P.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

This Appeal is filed against the judgment dated 20-08-2004 passed in S.C.No.108 of 1999 on the file of the V Additional Sessions Judge, West Godavari, Eluru, whereby and whereunder the appellant-A1 was convicted for the offences under Section 498-A and 304-B of IPC and accordingly sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of two years and also to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/- in default to suffer simple imprisonment for one month for the offence under Section 498-A of IPC, and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of ten years and also to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/- in default to suffer simple imprisonment for one year for the offence under Section 304-B of IPC. 2. The brief averments of the charge sheet are as follows: A-1 and A-3 are the sons of A-2. A-1 is working as Development Officer in LIC at Gopalapuram. The deceased by name Khandavalli Florence @ Anitha is the sister of PW-2 and daughter of PW-3. The deceased was married to A-1 on 31-08-1990. At the tim...

Star Health and Allied Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Kolli Hanitha

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Smt. M. Shreesha, Honble Member Aggrieved by the orders in C.C.No.201/2009 on the file of District Forum-II, Krishna at Vijayawada, opposite party preferred this appeal. The brief facts as set out in the complaint are that the complainant had renewed his Family Health Optima Insurance Plan policy No.P.131211/-1/2009/001972 on 06-2-2009 covering the period from 12-2-2009 to 11-2-2010 which covers his family members i.e. himself , his wife and his daughter. The complainant submitted by virtue of the policy, he and his family members are eligible to utilize Rs.2,00,000/- towards medical expenses. The complainant submitted that originally the policy was obtained in February, 2007 and it was renewed from time to time and during the 1st year of policy period, opposite party had paid hospital charges but thereafter the complainant received a letter on 08-7-2009 stating that the complainant failed to disclose the pre-existing ailment at the time of obtaining the policy. The complainant submitt...

R. Narasimha Reddy Vs. Venu Gopal Innai and Others

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

R. LAKSHMI NARASIMHA RAO, Honble Member This application is filed seeking recall of order dated 27-4-2012 for the purpose of enabling the counsel for the opposite party No.3 to advance arguments and the matter be heard in accordance with the order directing the hearing of CC Nos.108 and 118 of 2010 together. The petitioner in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, has stated that after filing the vakalath, he filed counter affidavit along with supporting documents and also affidavit in lieu of chief, he has stated that as per the understanding between the parties, agreement of sale dated 04-9-2008 comprehends allotment of flat in lieu of the flat already agreed to be sold and agreement dated 15-5-2007 stands cancelled. Further, he has stated that this Commission had passed order on 06-2-2012 directing the registry to club CC No.108/2010 with CC No.118/2010 and the matter was posted to 07-2-2012. CC.No.108/2010 came up for hearing and reserved for orders without noticing the or...

Sri Hari Krishna Soma Vs. Motilal Oswal Securities Ltd. and Others

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Smt. M. Shreesha, Honble Member Aggrieved by the order in CC 657/2008 on the file of District Forum-I, Hyderabad, the complainant preferred this appeal. The brief facts as set out in the case are that the complainant applied to opposite parties for opening a demat account on 23-9-2006 and was informed that the demat account number and operation manual would be furnished in due course and reposing confidence upon the opposite parties, the complainant purchased the following shares and paid Rs.1,70,803/- inclusive of commission from 09-10-2006 to 11-1-2007.DateName of the scripQuantity of sharesCash of the share Rs.Total value with service chargesPayment Encashed on09-10-2006Reliance Petroleum Ltd..100067.2567,567.9010-10-200616-10-2006ERA Constructions India Ltd.,20455.509,153-0020-10-200629-12-2006Noida Toll Bridge Co.10034-953,510.7110-01-200703-1-2007GMR infrastructure Ltd.,50378.8018,997.0010-1-200703-1-2007Niveli Lignite Corp.10057.2024,581.9910-1-200704-1-2007Nagarjuna constructio...

Abhishek Kumar Garg Vs. Aggarwal Goods Shifting Pvt. Ltd. and Another

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Smt. M. Shreesha, Honble Member Aggrieved by the order in C.C.No.410/2011 on the file of District Forum_I, Hyderabad, the complainant preferred this appeal. The brief facts as stated in the complaint are that the complainant was working at Gurgaon and took a new posting at Hyderabad and therefore booked his goods through opposite party No.1 at Gurgaun vide consignment note No.31214 on 27-12-2010 and paid Rs.29,672/- in which opposite party has added in bill No.31210-Rs.200 sales tax, Rs.3,000/- insurance charges, (3% of one lakh) Rs.2472 service tax and the complainant paid Rs.23,000/- on the spot and balance Rs.6672/- mentioned in the consignment note. The insurance cover note was not handed over to the complainant inspite of repeated requests. On 30-1-2011, opposite party No.2 informed the complainant that he should deposit Rs.9672 before delivery of goods but the complainant observed that most of the articles were destroyed or damaged and gave a police complaint and the opposite par...

Smt. Vallapureddy Geeta Bhavani Vs. Nallu Narasimha Reddy and Others

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2012(5)ALD616

Order : ( Per Sri MSR, J ) This appeal is filed against the docket order dated 20-12-2004 in OS SR No.5894 of 2004 of the District Judge, Warangal. 2. The appellant is the plaintiff in the suit. She instituted the said suit for partition of the plaint schedule property claiming 1/6th share in it and also for future mesne profits and costs. In the said suit she claimed to be the adopted daughter of the defendants/ respondents 1 and 2 and alleged that her adoption was accepted in the judgment dated 25-10-1982 in O.S.No.573 of 1982 on the file of the Court of the District Munsif, Suryapet. She further alleged that her marriage took place on 9-5-1990 and she is a coparcener of Joint Hindu family consisting of herself and the defendants 1 to 6 by virtue of Section 29(A) of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 (AP Amendment Act 13 of 1986). She contended that she is in joint possession of the plaint schedule property which belongs to the joint family and that she is entitled to the 1/6th share in ...

V. Vani Vs. V.B.V.S.M.K. Prasad and Others

Court: Andhra Pradesh

(Petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to set aside the order dated 15-06-2012 passed by the Hon’ble XIV Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad at L.B.Nagar, in Crl.MP.No.1019 of 2012 in C.C.No.240 of 2009 wherein it dismissed the petition U/s. 311 Cr.P.C. filed for calling and examining the additional witness for better appreciation and just decision of the case.) The petitioner/defacto-complainant is aggrieved by the impugned order of the XIV Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad at Lal Bahadur Nagar by which the lower Court dismissed the petition filed under Section 311 Cr.P.C refusing to give permission for examination of three named witnesses in the petition. The case under trial before the lower Court is one for the offence punishable under Section 498-A I.P.C. It is a case instituted by the police after investigation. During investigation, the investigating officer examined...

Veerappaneni Ravikanth Vs. the State of A.P., Rep by Public Prosecutor ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

(Petition under section 186(b) R/w 482 of Cr.P.C., praying that in the circumstances stated in the Petition/Affidavit/Memorandum of grounds filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to direct XXVI Metropolitan Magistrate, Mumbai at Borivali to transfer the case registered vide FIR in Crime No.489 of 2011, dt. 21-11-2011 on the file of the Borivali (West) PS., Mumbai, Maharashtra to the CID - RCIU Rajamundry, East Godavari District, by confirming the jurisdiction.) The petitioner is accused of offences punishable under Sections 420 and 467 IPC in Cr.No.144 of 2011 of C.I.D. Police Station, Hyderabad. The said case is being investigated by Regional Crime Investigation Unit of Rajahmundry of C.I.D. The accused is stated to have opened a current account in the name of J.S.W.Steels using a forged document at Andhra Bank, Sirigindalapadu Branch, Rampachodavaram Mandal, East Godavari District. The said current account was opened in the name of J.S.W. Steel Limited. The petitioner i...

P. Navaratan Reddy Vs. the Special Deputy Collector, Land Acquisition ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2012(5)ALD475

(Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleasd to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents herein in denying payment of interest on the awarded amount as per Sec.34 of the L.A. Act as high illegal, arbitrary and violative of Principles of natural justice and to forthwith direct the respondent herein to forthwith release the said interest amount as per sec.34 of the L.A. Act.) Heard Sri V. Rajagopal Reddy, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as Smt. Bhavana, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Land Acquisition appearing for the respondents. 2. Denial of payment of interest on the compensation awarded consequent on the acquisition of the petitioner’s land is challenged in this writ petition. 3. Petitioner was the owner of the land measuring 1650 square yards i...