Andhra Pradesh Court July 2012 Judgments

The Depot Manager Vs. Labour Court, Guntur Rep. by Its Presiding Offic ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

(Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed therewith, the Hon’ble High Court may be pleased to call for the records relating to M.P.No.196/84, dt. 12.10.1999 on the file of the Labour Court, Guntur and quash the same as arbitrary and illegal by way of issue of a Writ of Certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or orders as the Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.) Common order: In this batch of writ petitions, the question that arises for consideration is as to whether the Conductors and Drivers appointed by the A.P.S.R.T.C. subsequent to 01.01.1980 are entitled to be paid incentive increment for their holding Graduate qualification. A settlement was arrived at between the Corporation itself and its Union on 15.07.1972, marked as Ex.M.1, providing for three increments of Rs.10/- each for the Drivers and Conductors, who possess the qualification of Under Gr...

The Primary Agriculture Co-operative Society, Kumili, Vizianagaram Dis ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2012(5)ALD725

(Prayer: Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ or direction calling for the records relating to the order of 1st respondent passed in SC(A).1/2000 dt 16.2.2001 confirming the order of the 2nd respondent passed in A.P.S.E.F.A.7/95 dt 24.7.96 and quash the same.) The 3rd respondent by name Pakalapati Chandra Varma worked as Secretary in  the petitioner society from 1989 to 1995. Earlier to that he was an employee of another society. He retired from service on 11.01.1995, on attaining the age of superannuation. He filed an application under Section 51 of the Andhra Pradesh Shops and Establishments Act, 1988 (for short, 'the Act') before the 2nd respondent stating that he was not paid a) the salary from 01.12.1994 to 11.01.1995 b) gratuity for the services rendered by him from 27.07.1977 to 11.01.1995 c) pr...

G. Sammaiah Vs. the Mandal Revenue Officer and Others

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2012(6)ALD185

The petitioner was engaged by the Executive Engineer of Warangal District Scheduled Caste Service Co-operative Society Limited, the 2nd respondent herein, on daily wage basis. Complaining that he was removed from service, contrary to Section 25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (for short ‘the Act’), he filed I.D.No.123 of 1991 before the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Warangal. An award was passed in the I.D., on 25.06.1994, setting aside the order of removal and directing reinstatement of the petitioner into service, without back-wages, but with continuity of service. The 2nd respondent issued an order for reinstatement of the petitioner on daily wage basis. The petitioner did not join the duty on the ground that his appointment ought to have been as Site Engineer, with scale of pay. Therefore, he filed E.P.No.43 of 1994. The E.P was allowed on 30.10.1996. Ultimately, the petitioner was issued orders of appointment on 18.12.1996, and the E.P was closed, in ter...

Kalpana Kopaley @ K.Kalpana Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented b ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

(Prayer: Petition under Section 482 of the Crl.P.C. praying that in the circumstances stated in the Petition/Affidavit/Memorandum of grounds filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to quash C.C.No.890/08 pending on the file of X Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad, Malkajgiri, in the interest of Justice.) The petitioner/A-3 seeks for quashment of the case against her in C.C.No.890 of 2008 on the file of the X Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad, Malkajgiri. 2. Sri Sharad Sanghi, learned counsel for the petitioner, contended that the 2nd respondent-de facto complainant had compounded the offence and that the case was acquitted against A-2. He further contended that as the petitioner could not appear at the time of the compounding of the offence, as N.B.W. was pending against her, the trial Court did not compound the offence against the petitioner. He submitted that N.B.W. had already been recalled and that the petitioner is not able to obtain orders of compounding of the offen...

U. Mahalakshmi and Another Vs. the State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by Po ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

(Prayer: Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of criminal Petition filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to Quash the proceedings in C.C.No.282 of 2008 on the file of the Special Judicial I Class Magistrate (For Prohibition and Excise Offences), at Nalgonda.) The petitioners seek for quashment of C.C.No.282 of 2008 on the file of the Special Judicial Magistrate of First Class (for Prohibition and Excise Cases), Nalgonda. The 2nd respondent is the de facto complainant. The 2nd respondent laid complaint against three accused. The 1st accused is her husband. Accused 2 and 3, who are the elder sisters of the 1st accused, are the petitioners in this petition. The 2nd respondent laid a complaint making allegations against the accused for the offences under Sections 498-A and 506 IPC as well as under Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The same was registered as Crime No.80 of 2007 on the file of the Wom...

U.Mahalakshmi, Kamalapuri Colony, Hydera Vs. the State of Andhra Prade ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.G.SHANKAR Criminal Petition No.10942 o26. 7-2012 U.Mahalakshmi, Kamalapuri Colony, Hyderabad and another The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by Police, Women Police Station, Nalgonda, Through Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh and another Counsel for the petitioners: Sri P.S.P.Suresh Kumar Counsel for respondent No.1: Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P. Counsel for respondent No.2: Sri Pottigari Sridhar Reddy : : Case referred: Nil. Order: The petitioners seek for quashment of C.C.No.282 of 2008 on the file of the Special Judicial Magistrate of First Class (for Prohibition and Excise Cases), Nalgonda. The 2nd respondent is the de facto complainant. The 2nd respondent laid complaint against three accused. The 1st accused is her husband. Accused 2 and 3, who are the elder sisters of the 1st accused, are the petitioners in this petition. The 2nd respondent laid a complaint making allegations against the accused for the offences under Sections 498-A and 5...

The Primary Agriculture Cooperative Soci Vs. Authority Under Section 5 ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.6539 o26. 07.2012 The Primary Agriculture Cooperative Society, Kumili, Vizianagaram District, represented by its President Neelapu Bhupati Ramakrishna Reddy, Authority under Section 53(1) of A.P.Shops and Establishment Act, 1988 and Assistant Commissioner of Labour, Vizianagaram and others .. Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner : Sri O.Manohar Reddy Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 and 3 : Government Pleader for Labour Counsel for respondent No.3 : Sri G.Venkateswara Rao ORDER: The 3rd respondent by name Pakalapati Chandra Varma worked as Secretary in the petitioner society from 1989 to 1995. Earlier to that he was an employee of another society. He retired from service on 11.01.1995, on attaining the age of superannuation. He filed an application under Section 51 of the Andhra Pradesh Shops and Establishments Act, 1988 (for short, 'the Act') before the 2nd respondent stating that he was not paid a) the salary from 01.12.1994 to...

Kalpana Kopaley @ K.Kalpana Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented b ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.G.SHANKAR CRIMINAL PETITION NO.10900 o26. 07.2012 Kalpana Kopaley @ K.Kalpana State of Andhra Pradesh, represented by Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P. and another Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri Sharad Sanghi Counsel for respondent No.1: Public Prosecutor Counsel for respondent No.2: Sri George Victor Gist: Head Note: Cases referred: NIL ORDER:- The petitioner/A-3 seeks for quashment of the case against her in C.C.No.890 of 2008 on the file of the X Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad, Malkajgiri. 2. Sri Sharad Sanghi, learned counsel for the petitioner, contended that the 2nd respondent-de facto complainant had compounded the offence and that the case was acquitted against A-2. He further contended that as the petitioner could not appear at the time of the compounding of the offence, as N.B.W. was pending against her, the trial Court did not compound the offence against the petitioner. He submitted that N.B.W. had already been recalled and that the peti...

Metlife India Insurance Company Private Limited Represented by Its Bra ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Smt. M. Shreesha, Honble Member Aggrieved by the order in C.C.No.24/2007 on the file of District Forum-II, Rajahmundry opposite parties preferred this appeal. The brief facts as set out in the complaint are that the complainants husband took a Metlife policy bearing No.1200600158255 for Rs.3,30,000/- by paying a premium of Rs.51,730/- and he was examined by the panel doctor of the opposite party and the policy came into force by 19-1-2006. The complainants submitted that opposite party No.2 issued the policy after satisfying the health condition of the policy holder. While so, the insured died on 31-1-2006. The complainant sent the claim claiming the benefits under the policy and the opposite party raised certain objections and they were complied in the month of February, 2006. Thereafter, the opposite party repudiated the policy on 16-6-2006 stating that the policy holder did not disclose the health condition and therefore the policy is void. The complainant submitted that the policy ...

S. Madhusudhan and Others Vs. the Revenue Divisional Officer and Other ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

(Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction, one more particularly in the nature of a writ of "Mandamus" declaring the proceedings No.A2/190/2012 dated 04-02-2012 issued by the 1st respondent as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and contrary to the provisions of A.P. Rights in Land and Pattadar Passbook Act, 1971 and in  breach of principles of natural justice and consequently, set aside the same.) The respective fathers of the petitioners herein are said to have purchased different extents of land, aggregating to 92 acres in survey Nos.668 to 673 and 679 of Gundlapochampally Village, Medchal Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, from the owners thereof through unregistered documents, in the year 1975.  It is stated that the petitioners, or their fathers, as the case may be, have initiated proceedings under Section 5-A of the A.P...