Andhra Pradesh Court July 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Boodati Radha Krishnaiah and Others Vs. the State Project Director and ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-06-2012
Reported in: 2012(5)ALT516; 2012(5)ALD621
Common Judgment: As the subject matter of the dispute raised in these Writ Petitions is common, they are heard and being disposed of together. In order to translate Article 21-A of the Constitution of India, conferring fundamental right on the children of the age group of 6 to 14 years to free and compulsory education into a reality, the Parliament has enacted The Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 (for short "the RTE Act"). As a part of implementation of the provisions of the RTE Act, the Government of India evidently initiated several measures. One such measure is providing free uniforms for all the children belonging to SC/ST/BPL families studying in Government schools. The Government of India, Ministry of Human Resources Development, Department of School Education and Literacy, addressed letter No.15/4/2011-SSA(PR), dated 8-6-2011 to State Project Director, Rajiv Vidya Mission (Sarva Siksha Abhiyan)-respondent No.1 (for short “RVM”) in all thes...
Dara Suresh Vs. the Government of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by Its P ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-05-2012
(Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, more particularly, one in the nature of writ of Certiorari and call for records relating to and connected with decision of the Hon’ble A.P. Administrative Tribunal, dated 14.02.2012 rendered in O.A.No.629 of 2011 and consequently impugned Rc.No.201/RandT/Admin.2/09, dated 06-09-2010 of the 2nd respondent rejecting the request of the applicant to extend the benefit of relaxation as granted vide G.O.Ms.No.85, Home (Legal-II) Department, dated 7-2-2009 and quash or set aside the same, by holding the same as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and is also not in accordance with the directions issued by the Hon’ble Tribunal in O.A.No.4992/2009 dated 12-08-2010 and consequently direct the respondents to recruit the applicant as Stipendiary Cadet Trainee Police Constab...
P. Venkata Rao Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by Its Executive ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-05-2012
This writ petition has been filed challenging the order No.CCRAI/4304/06, dated 19.2.2008 passed by the Chief Controlling Revenue Authority and Commissioner and Inspector General-3rd respondent confirming the order No.G1/2447/2004, dated 28.2.2006 passed by the Collector and District Registrar-4th respondent, whereby, the petitioner has been asked to pay the stamp duty on the aggregate amount of the agreement dated 31-3-2004. 2. Facts, in brief, are: - The Government of Andhra Pradesh represented by its Executive Engineer (R and B) Division, Tenali, Guntur District-1st respondent issued notice in Feb/March 2004 inviting bids for the right to collect toll tax for the bridge across Kommamuru Canal at K.M 8/0 of Tenali-Narakoduru Road in Guntur District from 1.4.2004 to 31.3.2006. The petitioner became the successful bidder and respondents 1 and 2 accepted his bid. As per the terms of the agreement, the petitioner was required to pay an amount of Rs.14,58,452/- towards deposit, which shal...
Tatikonda Brahma Linga Swamy Vs. the Commissioner, Endowments Departme ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-05-2012
Reported in: 2012(5)ALD219
The petitioner is a member of founder’s family of Sri Venkateswara Swamy Temple, Narasipatnam Village and Mandal, Viaskhapatnam District. He has filed this Writ Petition questioning the orders of the Commissioner, Endowments Department, the 1st respondent herein, in proceedings D.Dis.No.B3/10588/2003, dated 11.03.2003, authorizing the Executive Officer to permit devotees to perform annual Kalyanam and other sevas by paying Rusum (fees) of Rs.300/- along with the family of Chairman and Founder Trustee of the subject temple. The case of the petitioner is that Sri Venkateswara Swamy Temple was founded by his ancestor during 1902 and after the lifetime of the founder, the temple came under the management of his sons and grandsons. The petitioner pleads that ever since the temple had been founded there has been a practice and usage to perform “Kalyana Mahotsavam” by the members of Thatikonda family during the celebration of annual Brahmotsavam by reciting the gotram and na...
Raavi Warehousing Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by Its Secret ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-05-2012
ORDER: The A.P. State Warehousing Corporation, the 2nd respondent herein issued a tender notice dated 17-09-2010, inviting tenders for construction of godowns of different capacities, at 14 places in the State, for storage requirements of Food Corporation of India (FCI), the 3rd respondent herein. Godown capacity of 40,000 metric tonnes (MTS) was notified at Gudivada in Krishna District. The petitioner and another agency submitted their tenders. The evaluation is at two stages, viz., technical bid and price bid. The petitioner approached this Court on several occasions for consideration of its technical bid, and opening of the price bid. At the hearing of the writ petition, the 3rd respondent brought to the notice of this Court that the proposal to construct godowns in different States for the benefit of FCI were cancelled through proceedings dated 09-12-2011. For the State of Andhra Pradesh, the cancellation accounted for the capacity of 1,05,000/- MTS. The proposal to construct a god...
M/S. Narmada Seeds by Its Proprietor Vs. United India Insurance Co. Lt ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Jul-05-2012
Honble Sri Justice D.Appa Rao, President) The appellant is the unsuccessful complainant. The case of the complainant in brief is that he got insured his building and stocks under Standard Fire and Special Perils Policy covering the period from 22-6-2007 to 21-6-2008 for a sum of Rs.20,00,000/-. While so on 22-6-2007, there was a cyclone and heavy floods and the water entered into the premises damaging the stocks completely. When the said fact was intimated, the insurance company appointed a surveyor by name, Mr.M.R. Srinivasan, who conducted survey and submitted his report assessing the net loss at Rs.1,39,093/-. Despite the fact that he has been approaching the insurance company to settle the claim, they have been dragging the matter on one pretext or the other and since no reply was received, he got issued a legal notice on 22-4 2011 claiming the amount for which no reply was even given. Therefore, he filed the complaint for recovery of Rs.1,39,093/- together with interest at 12% p.a...
Mathi Vidya Sagar Vs. M/S Hindusthan Petroleum Corporation Ltd, Rep. b ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-04-2012
(Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, direction or order, declaring the Complaint Disposal Order Ref: DSC/VRO/142/A, dated 31.08.2011, communicated to the petitioner on 16.09.2011 and served on the petitioner on 21.09.2011, and the selection of Sri Kakollu vijaya, S/o. Basavaiah, the 3rd respondent herein, as No.1 for appointment as dealer for the retail outlet at Marteru, West Godavari District, as illegal and void and direct respondents 1 and 2 to consider the case of the petitioner for the appointment as the dealer as the petitioner secured the highest marks and percentage and appoint the petitioner as the dealer.) The 1st respondent published a notice dated 06-09-2010, inviting applications for selection of dealers of petroleum outletsat various places in the State of Andhra Pr...
Dr. B. Lakshmi, Associate Professor and Head Department of Ece, Nation ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-04-2012
(Petition Under Section 482 of the Crl.P.C., praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings in Crime No.64/2012 on the file of the Station House Officer, Kazipet Police Station, Warangal Urban, Warangal District.) This Criminal Petition is filed to quash the proceedings against the petitioners-A1 to A5 in Crime No.64 of 2012 of Kazipet Police Station, Warangal District, registered for the offences under Sections 3 (1)(ix) and (x) and 4 of SC and ST (POA) Act, 1989 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’). The second respondent herein is the complainant. 2. The factual matrix of the case is that the second respondent herein by name P. Pruthvi filed a private complaint under Section 200 Cr.P.C. before the IV Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate at Warangal. In the complaint it is the case of the second respondent that she had initially joined as Lecturer in ECE Department in the year ...
The National Insurance Co.Ltd. Vs. Shaik Yousuf Bee and Others
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-04-2012
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R. KANTHA RAO C.M.A.No.3377 o04. 07.2012 The National Insurance Co.Ltd. Shaik Yousuf Bee and others Counsel for the Appellant: Smt S.A.V.Ratnam Counsel for respondents: Sri Kouturi Vijay Kumar HEAD NOTE: ?Cases referred: JUDGMENT: Heard the learned counsel appearing for the appellant-insurance company and the learned counsel appearing for the respondents/claimants.2. This appeal is filed by the National Insurance Company Limited which was the third respondent before the Tribunal below against the order dated 22.03.2004 passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal-cum-Principal District Judge, Khammam in O.P.No.616 of 1997.3. Shaik Afzal Miya, a carpenter, aged 30 years while returning from Domercharla Village by walk, was knocked down by an ambassador car at about 12.30 AM, as a result of which he fell down and the said car ran over him. On receiving severe injuries, he died on the spot. One P. Ramulu, who was coming by walk along with the deceased informed PW.1...
Smt. D. Vijayalakshmi Vs. Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance Co. Ltd. a ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Jul-04-2012
Smt. M. Shreesha, Honble Member Aggrieved by the orders in C.C.No.97/2007 on the file of District Forum, Anantapur, the complainant preferred this appeal. The brief facts as set out in the complaint are that the complainant is the owner of the building bearing door No.12/72 (old) and door No.12/323 (new) Sainagar, Anantapur and insured the same with the first opposite party through second opposite party and paid the requisite premium. The first opposite party accepted the same and issued the policy vide number FM00029718000100 valid from 25-8-2005 to 24-8-2006. The complainant submitted that he let out his building to one Kalyani Medical Agencies and the said building is having electricity service connection H.S.C.85347. While so on the intervening night of 11/12/5/2006 between 1.00 A.M and 2.00 A.M. there was electrical short circuit due to which the entire medicine stock in the building, refrigerator, furniture were totally damaged. The complainant submitted that as far as the buildi...