Skip to content


Workers - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: workers Year: 2000 Page 1 of about 321 results (0.022 seconds)
Sep 29 2000 (HC)

icm Engineering Workers Union Vs. Union of India and Others

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Sep-29-2000

Reported in: 2000VIIAD(Delhi)1037; 89(2001)DLT529; 2000(56)DRJ851; (2001)ILLJ1127Del

..... january 1997 writ petition is filed on 30th october 1998 by that time these contract workers had worked for a period ranging from 1 and 1 2 years to 5 and ..... such disputes after recording evidence iv if a writ petition is filed by the contract workers alleging violation of sections 7 and 12 of the act such a writ petition can .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 07 2000 (HC)

Gordon Woodroffe Workers and Staff Union Vs. Joint Commissioner of Lab ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Feb-07-2000

Reported in: (2000)IILLJ1150Mad

..... the rules under the industrial disputes act for permission to effect retrenchment of the workers these 96 workers were described as apprentices the learned counsel pointed out that this was a pure ..... during the pendency of the application it was obvious that the description of the workers as juniormost workers of the company was a patent lie a most roundabout treatment has been given .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 18 2000 (HC)

Richardson and Cruddas (1972) Ltd. Vs. Association of Engineering Work ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Aug-18-2000

Reported in: 2001(1)BomCR723; [2000(87)FLR573]; (2001)IIILLJ698Bom

..... industrial tribunal culminating in the award of the present proceeding the union representing the workers had filed complaints under the provisions of the maharashtrarecognition of trade unions and prevention ..... until october 1 1992 the industrial tribunal held that from october 1 1992 the workers were admittedly in continuous service under the protective orders passed by the industrial court .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 21 2000 (HC)

Headload Workers Welfare Board Vs. Moidutty

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Aug-21-2000

Reported in: (2001)ILLJ523Ker

..... applicable only to specified areas once the scheme is applicable all headload workers other than permanent workers attached to establishments can be employed by establishments only through the committee ..... act 1923 appeal against award of commissioner granting 100 workmen compensation to head load worker accident during course of employment and arising out of employment committee deemed employer no .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 11 2000 (SC)

Indian Overseas Bank Vs. I.O.B. Staff Canteen Workers' Union and Anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Apr-11-2000

Reported in: 2000(2)CTC506; [2000(85)FLR672]; JT2000(4)SC503; (2000)ILLJ1618SC; 2000(3)SCALE255; (2000)4SCC245; [2000]2SCR1212; (2000)3UPLBEC1920

..... three types of canteens the demand for regularisation was considered to be unsustainable since the workers could not substantiate the existence of relationship of employer employee 13 in indian petrochemicals ..... stand dismissed no costs labour and industrial grievance whether demand of bank staff canteen workers union for reinstatement of 33 canteen employees for whose names given in annexure into .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 17 2000 (HC)

Food Corporation of India Workers' Union Vs. Food Corporation of India ...

Court: Gujarat

Decided on: Nov-17-2000

Reported in: (2001)ILLJ1296Guj

..... there is a consensus that out of this list of workers the workers in the category of loaders and casual labourers as may ..... continuing to be engaged as such and for absorption as regular workers of the first respondent that they have legitimate right and ..... reality nothing but camouflage sham and bogus just to deprive the workers from their legitimate rights and claims of having minimum wages .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 20 2000 (HC)

Indian Airlines Canteen Workers' Union Vs. Director Personnel, Indian ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Apr-20-2000

Reported in: (2000)IIILLJ979Mad

..... again for this reason that managements and the governmental agencies in particular should not allow workers to remain as casual labourers or temporary employees for an unreasonably long period of ..... act 1947 and air corporations act 1953 petition seeking direction to respondent to regularize canteen workers working in respondent in view of apex court regularisation has to be inconsistence with scheme .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 08 2000 (SC)

Municipal Corporation of Delhi Vs. Female Workers (Muster Roll) and an ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Mar-08-2000

Reported in: AIR2000SC1274; 2000(2)ALT34(SC); 84(2000)DLT450(SC); [2000(85)FLR185]; JT2000(3)SC13; (2000)ILLJ846SC; (2000)125PLR371; RLW2000(2)SC329; 2000(2)SCALE269; (2000)3SCC224; [20

..... justification for denying the benefit of this act to casual workers or workers employed on dally wage basis 12 section 2 of ..... administration to the industrial tribunal for adjudication whether the female workers working on muster roll should be given any maternity benefit ..... or economic organisation or in any other way to all workers agricultural industrial or otherwise work a living wage conditions of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 28 2000 (FN)

Eastern Associated Coal Corp. Vs. Mine Workers

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Nov-28-2000

..... reinstatement did not violate the strong regulation based public policy against drug use by workers who perform safety sensitive functions the fourth circuit affirmed held public policy considerations do ..... district court while recognizing a strong regulation based public policy against drug use by workers who perform safety sensitive functions held that smith s conditional reinstatement did not .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 06 2000 (HC)

Association of Engineering Workers Vs. Wmi Cranes Limited and Another

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Mar-06-2000

Reported in: 2000(3)BomCR755; [2000(87)FLR754]

..... complaint lodged by the present petitioners considering the fact that other workers based on the said clause are making payment to respondent no ..... from the wages such a clause cannot be foisted on unwilling workers or members of other unions this would be destroying the ..... labour practice and the respondent no 1 cannot compel the other workers of members of petitioner union to give an undertaking to .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //