Skip to content


Workers - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: workers Year: 1933 Page 1 of about 14 results (0.017 seconds)
Apr 10 1933 (FN)

United States Vs. Dubilier Condenser Corp.

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Apr-10-1933

..... of government salaries thus the government has suffered loss among its most capable class of workers footnote 27 the committee recommended legislation to create an interdepartmental patents board and further ..... is irresistible that their scientific curiosity was precisely what gave the inventors value as research workers the government employed it and gave it free rein in performing the broad duty .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 10 1933 (FN)

Levering and Garrigues Co. Vs. Morrin

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Apr-10-1933

..... to the filing of the present bill had already held united mine workers v coronado coal co 259 u s 344 259 u s 410 ..... the question was thus determined by applying the coronado and united leather workers cases we said the alleged conspiracy and the acts here complained of ..... 411 united leather workers international union v herkert 265 u s 457 the controlling application of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 30 1933 (PC)

Bakaralli Makhdoombaksha Vs. the Sassoon and Alliance Silk Mills Co. L ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Aug-30-1933

Reported in: AIR1934Bom126; (1934)36BOMLR190

..... the learned chief judge who held that the plaintiff was a piece worker and gave him rs 32 pay during august rs 5 for the ..... 30 for wrongful dismissal the finding that the plaintiff was a piece worker and the rate of pay allowed are not challenged 10 the matter ..... of service although in point of fact the plaintiff being a piece worker was not employed by the month and the learned chief judge was .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 09 1933 (FN)

Aetna Life Ins. Co. Vs. Moses

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-09-1933

..... january 9 1933 287 u s 530 syllabus 1 under the longshoremen s and harbor workers compensation act made applicable to the district of columbia as a workmen s compensation law ..... administratrix claimed and has accepted an award of compensation under the longshoremen s and harbor workers compensation act march 4 1927 c 509 44 stat 1924 made applicable as a workmen .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 06 1933 (FN)

Voehl Vs. Indemnity Ins. Co. of North America

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Feb-06-1933

..... the district of columbia syllabus 1 in a case under the longshoremen s and harbor workers compensation act as applied to employment in the district of columbia the issue before the ..... d c code tit 19 11 12 the provisions of the longshoremen s and harbor workers compensation act 33 u s c 901 950 are made applicable to employees as stated .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 04 1933 (PC)

Akshay Kumar Maiti and ors. Vs. Emperor

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Aug-04-1933

Reported in: AIR1933Cal880,145Ind.Cas.874

..... sova is a sister of bepin and mistress of one nogen akshay is a fellow worker of nogen bepin was priest in the house holds of both girls parents and officiated ..... no direct concern with the girls parents families he was said to have been a worker in sova s brother s mill 9 this evidence was not in my opinion sufficient .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 13 1933 (FN)

Louis K. Liggett Co. Vs. Lee

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Mar-13-1933

..... in the hands of a few the changes thereby wrought in the lives of the workers of the owners and of the general public are so fundamental and far reaching as .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 10 1933 (FN)

Moffat Tunnel League Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Apr-10-1933

..... sue brown v united states 276 u s 134 276 u s 141 united mine workers v coronado coal co 259 u s 344 259 u s 385 st paul typothetae .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 13 1933 (FN)

Vancouver Steamship Co., Ltd. Vs. Rice

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Mar-13-1933

..... hour later respondent was appointed his administratrix and electing under the longshoremen s and harbor workers compensation act 33 33 u s c 933 to assert her claim against a third .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 20 1933 (PC)

Philip Spratt and anr. Vs. Emperor

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Nov-20-1933

Reported in: AIR1934All207

..... necessary to do so it is dear that he was the moving spirit in organising workers and peasants parties in india and in giving a lead to the other communists numerous .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //