Skip to content


Workers - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: workers Year: 1955 Page 1 of about 91 results (0.02 seconds)
Apr 04 1955 (FN)

Clothing Workers Vs. Richman Brothers Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Apr-04-1955

..... employer from pursuing his action in the state court petitioner an unincorporated association of clothing workers was responsible for peaceful picketing of a number of respondent s retail stores presumably to ..... labor relations board had jurisdiction of its subject matter richman brothers co v amalgamated clothing workers 114 f supp 185 rehearing denied 116 f supp 800 upon remand the union invoked .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 07 1955 (HC)

The Madras Provincial Type Foundry Workers' Union Vs. Ramalinga Mudali ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Oct-07-1955

Reported in: AIR1957Mad68; (1956)IMLJ295

..... commissioner for workmen s compensation passed on applications made by a workers union under section 15 2 payment of wages act against ..... of bonus alleged to be due and payable to the workers under an agreement between them and the proprietors the commissioner ..... that the appeals were not competent because the applications by the workers were not entertained by the commissioner and also because there .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 30 1955 (HC)

Firebricks and Potteries Ltd. Vs. Firebricks and Potteries Ltd., Worke ...

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Sep-30-1955

Reported in: (1956)ILLJ571Kant

..... and have sprung up in several parts of india and disputes between the management and workers are a frequent occurrence it is not likely that the central government intended to determine .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 05 1955 (HC)

Bhuralal Vs. Jiwansingh and anr.

Court: Rajasthan

Decided on: Sep-05-1955

Reported in: AIR1956Raj21

..... and dismiss to pay remuneration to organize the work etc a full time worker usually works in a week for 40 hours or more depending on ..... of workman or not it cannot be said that a part time worker is not a workman within the meaning of the provisions of the ..... i d act however to decide the status of a worker rendering services for less than 40 hours a week various aspects are .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 08 1955 (HC)

Dayachand and ors. Vs. Sanwalchand and ors.

Court: Rajasthan

Decided on: Aug-08-1955

Reported in: AIR1956Raj6

..... and dismiss to pay remuneration to organize the work etc a full time worker usually works in a week for 40 hours or more depending on ..... of workman or not it cannot be said that a part time worker is not a workman within the meaning of the provisions of the ..... i d act however to decide the status of a worker rendering services for less than 40 hours a week various aspects are .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 04 1955 (HC)

Roshan Lal Vs. Bhuramal

Court: Rajasthan

Decided on: Apr-04-1955

Reported in: AIR1956Raj25

..... and dismiss to pay remuneration to organize the work etc a full time worker usually works in a week for 40 hours or more depending on ..... of workman or not it cannot be said that a part time worker is not a workman within the meaning of the provisions of the ..... i d act however to decide the status of a worker rendering services for less than 40 hours a week various aspects are .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 15 1955 (HC)

Nand Lal and anr. Vs. Pooran and anr.

Court: Rajasthan

Decided on: Jul-15-1955

Reported in: AIR1956Raj9

..... and dismiss to pay remuneration to organize the work etc a full time worker usually works in a week for 40 hours or more depending on ..... of workman or not it cannot be said that a part time worker is not a workman within the meaning of the provisions of the ..... i d act however to decide the status of a worker rendering services for less than 40 hours a week various aspects are .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 14 1955 (HC)

Bhairulal and ors. Vs. the State

Court: Rajasthan

Decided on: Oct-14-1955

Reported in: 1957CriLJ237

..... and dismiss to pay remuneration to organize the work etc a full time worker usually works in a week for 40 hours or more depending on ..... of workman or not it cannot be said that a part time worker is not a workman within the meaning of the provisions of the ..... i d act however to decide the status of a worker rendering services for less than 40 hours a week various aspects are .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 21 1955 (HC)

Bhimsingh Vs. State

Court: Rajasthan

Decided on: Jan-21-1955

Reported in: 1955CriLJ992

..... and dismiss to pay remuneration to organize the work etc a full time worker usually works in a week for 40 hours or more depending on ..... of workman or not it cannot be said that a part time worker is not a workman within the meaning of the provisions of the ..... i d act however to decide the status of a worker rendering services for less than 40 hours a week various aspects are .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 14 1955 (HC)

Kanhaiyalal Vs. Sansmal and anr.

Court: Rajasthan

Decided on: Sep-14-1955

Reported in: AIR1956Raj18

..... and dismiss to pay remuneration to organize the work etc a full time worker usually works in a week for 40 hours or more depending on ..... of workman or not it cannot be said that a part time worker is not a workman within the meaning of the provisions of the ..... i d act however to decide the status of a worker rendering services for less than 40 hours a week various aspects are .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //