Use Based Application - Year 2012 - Judgments

Aug 10 2012 (TRI)

The Research Foundation of State University of New York Vs. the Assist ...

Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

Decided on: Aug-10-2012

..... patents and designs delhi dated 13th april 2009 the patent application no 3219 delnp 2005 relates to ceramic based nanoparticles for entrapping therapeutic agents for photodynamic therapy and method ..... to photodynamic therapy pdt and more specifically to illumination systems composition and methods of using light emitting nanoparticles to activate photosensitive compounds at the target site for pdt .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 02 2012 (HC)

Dinesh Aggarwal and Another Vs. Dri

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jul-02-2012

..... sheets manufactured out of scrap or recycled material are generally dark and find use in opaque applications is based only upon the statement of m s m h polymers who as already ..... it cannot be disputed that polycarbonate sheets have different applications clear sheets are used for optical purposes some sheets have bullet proof applications polycarbonate sheets are of several varieties and customs .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 24 2012 (HC)

Kalyansinh K. Kumpavat Vs. Prashant J. Patel

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Sep-24-2012

..... 11 the applicant trading member under the bye laws has been provided with various discretionary powers he has to use this discretion based upon ..... a clear finding given by the learned arbitrator that the applicant respondent failed to produce proper proof of deliveries pods in ..... still it is necessary for such trade member to use such discretion based upon the commerce in question they are the expert .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 24 2012 (HC)

Kalyansinh K. Kumpavat Vs. Prashant J. Patel

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Sep-24-2012

..... 11 the applicant trading member under the bye laws has been provided with various discretionary powers he has to use this discretion based upon ..... a clear finding given by the learned arbitrator that the applicant respondent failed to produce proper proof of deliveries pods in ..... still it is necessary for such trade member to use such discretion based upon the commerce in question they are the expert .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 06 2012 (TRI)

Ram Kishan Vs. the Chairman and Managing Director and Others

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Decided on: Mar-06-2012

..... paragraph 18 of his counter reply about the fraudulent act of the applicant in using forged medical certificates based on the report received from the competent medical authorities that respondent ..... no 1 connived with the applicant due to misplaced notion of compassion that .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 23 2012 (TRI)

K. Balakrishnan and Others Vs. Union of India, Represented by Secretar ...

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam

Decided on: Jan-23-2012

..... mentioned above 10 we are in full agreement with the learned counsel for the applicants that the expression ignore used in annexure a 3 means only take no notice the respondents have to ..... fix the pay of the applicants based on the pay they drew on 31 12 2005 taking .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 04 2012 (TRI)

M/S. Embassy Apparels Vs. Bhpc Marketing Inc and Others

Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

Decided on: Apr-04-2012

..... to appreciate the objections under section 9 which was based on the fact that the application for registration was a proposed to be used mark h the registrar failed to appreciate that the ..... of clothing footwear and headgear the mark was proposed to be used on the date of application the said application was advertised before acceptance in the trade marks journal no 1231 s .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 09 2012 (TRI)

M/S. P.i. Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd Vs. M/S. Syncom Health Care Ltd

Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

Decided on: Mar-09-2012

..... of their mark since the year 2001 and therefore have acquiesced in the respondents use the applicants had issued the legal notice to syncom formulations as observed earlier the evidence is ..... respondents adoption and use the respondents have spent substantial amount for promoting the sales of their product the applications have been filed on some false and frivolous grounds and based on misconception .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 26 2012 (HC)

Macleods Pharmaceuticals Limited Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Apr-26-2012

..... and ii that there was an error in the application of the precautionary principle 102 by a decision rendered ..... use of the product to materialise iii the only limiting factor on the application of the precautionary principle is that a preventive measure cannot properly be based ..... of approved drug products maintained by them in 2008 based on the recommendations of the monitoring sub committee of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 22 2012 (HC)

Tata Motors Limited and Others Vs. the State of West Bengal and Others

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Jun-22-2012

..... declare that the legislature by using the word compensation meant compensation based on the principles mentioned in sections 23 and 24 of the land acquisition act 1894 as applicable in view of my ..... dispossessed 8221 or his right to use and enjoy the property was 8220 seriously impaired 8221 by the impugned law then certainly the eminent domain will be applicable we have also noticed in k .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Use Based Application - Judgment Search Results