Skip to content


Use Based Application - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: use based application Year: 1955 Page 1 of about 576 results (0.764 seconds)
Jan 31 1955 (FN)

United States Vs. Koppers Co., Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-31-1955

..... the tax shall be determined by using such constructive average base period net income in lieu of the average base period net income otherwise determined under this subchapter d application for relief under this section ..... due without regard to the application for relief under 722 in doing so he found it necessary to proceed under i r c 713 using excess profits credits based upon the taxpayer s income .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 16 1955 (HC)

B. Lachhmi Das and ors. Vs. Panchmurti Shivalinga

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Mar-16-1955

Reported in: AIR1955All635

..... pauper need not detain us as nothing turns on it the applicants base their contention on the first order dated 16 3 1946 by ..... of the court and it follows from this that the proceeding based on the application must come to an end as soon as the court ..... based on any sound reason this language is similar to that used by allsop j in chunna mal s case a and lays emphasis on the court view that the applicant .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 13 1955 (HC)

Marimuthu Goundar Vs. Ponnammal and ors.

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Dec-13-1955

Reported in: (1956)2MLJ25

of notice the application will be treated as a good application though it would still be open to the decree holder

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 14 1955 (HC)

Dr. Brijendra Swarup Vs. Election Tribunal, Lucknow and ors.

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Sep-14-1955

Reported in: AIR1956All111

of the aboveorders no separate orders are required on civilmiscellaneous application no 854 of 1955 election issue of nomination section 100

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 10 1955 (HC)

H.E.H. the Nizam, Rajpramukh of Hyderabad Vs. B.G. Keskar and ors.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Jun-10-1955

Reported in: 1955CriLJ1590

the victims of his passion and that the building is used as a cellular jail wherein not less than 300 adult pp 17 to 19 and in para 13 of the application the following extracts from the aforesaid letter are given as

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 11 1955 (HC)

State Vs. Beni Bahadur Singh

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Nov-11-1955

Reported in: 1957CriLJ268

paid in the area concerned the district magistrate rejected the application on the ground that the applicant was not an employed

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 31 1955 (FN)

United States Vs. International Boxing Club

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-31-1955

..... yankees 346 u s 356 did not immunize from application of the sherman act all businesses based on professional sports pp 348 u s 241 ..... affair but that fact alone does not bar application of the sherman act to a business based on the promotion of such matches if the ..... to take of a wholly local spectacle or exhibition by thereafter using the channels of interstate commerce to exhibit them does not make .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 22 1955 (HC)

Kunnathvelli Viswanathan, Minor by Next Friend and Brother Kunhikrishn ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Nov-22-1955

Reported in: AIR1956Mad604; (1956)2MLJ87

..... as the date fron which its provisions must be deemed to be applicable could be applied only from 5th december 1945 28 our answer therefore ..... 5th of december 1945 any landlord has obtained a decree for eviction based upon the interpretation of the phrase requires the holding as laid down ..... provisions of madras act xxiv of 1945 and the change made by using the word needs to put it in another way if after .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 15 1955 (HC)

TabiruddIn Mallick and anr. Vs. Protiva Rani Devi and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Mar-15-1955

Reported in: AIR1956Cal454

error in law as ext 5 on which it was based was not admissible in evidence it appears however that even suit 8 prima faice the civil court in deciding an application under sub section 8 of section 37a has to look

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 25 1955 (HC)

Virina Soorayya Vs. Virina Mallayya and ors.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Jan-25-1955

Reported in: AIR1955AP229a; [1955]28ITR362(AP)

is one of limitation and the following facts may be useful for appreciating it 2 veerina venkatarathnam and some others filed munsif and on appeal the subordinate judge held that the application was barred by limitation as having been filed more than

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //