Skip to content


Use Based Application - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: use based application Year: 1912 Page 1 of about 499 results (1.758 seconds)
Feb 15 1912 (PC)

The King-emperor Vs. Nilakanta Alias Brahmachari and ors.

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Feb-15-1912

Reported in: (1912)22MLJ490

..... to a police officer should not be admissible is to my mind equally applicable whether it is to be used as substantive evidence or for the purpose of corroboration 125 i must now ..... argument which treats the declaration that a conviction is not illegal merely because it is based on the uncorroborated testimony of an accomplice as equivalent to a declaration that a conviction .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 17 1912 (PC)

Muthukumarsawmi Pillai and ors. Vs. Emperor

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Apr-17-1912

Reported in: 14Ind.Cas.896

..... to a police officer should not be admissible is to my mind equally applicable whether it is to be used as substantive evidence or for the purpose of corroboration 118 i must now ..... bench whether open to review under clause 26 of letters patent accomplice evidence of conviction based on corroboration previous statements of accomplices whether corroboration previous statements made to a c i .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 17 1912 (PC)

Muthukumaraswami Pillai and Seven ors. Vs. King-emperor

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Apr-17-1912

Reported in: (1912)ILR35Mad397

..... to a police officer should not be admissible is to my mind equally applicable whether it is to be used as substantive evidence or for the purpose of corroboration 133 i must now ..... argument which treats the declaration that a conviction is not illegal merely because it is based on the uncorroborated testimony of an accomplice as equivalent to a declaration that a conviction .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 28 1912 (PC)

Bhonda Singh and ors. Vs. Dowlat Roy and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Feb-28-1912

Reported in: 14Ind.Cas.93

in accordance with the terms of the judgment in that application it was alleged that the suit had been decreed in

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 29 1912 (PC)

The Eastern Mortgage and Agency Co., Ld. Vs. FakuruddIn Mahomed Chowdh ...

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Jul-29-1912

Reported in: 17Ind.Cas.849

was granted and three days afterwards put in two formal applications applying for rules on the opposite party to show cause

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 05 1912 (PC)

Eastern Mortgage and Agency Co. Ld. Vs. Rakea Khatun and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Aug-05-1912

Reported in: 17Ind.Cas.202

to support the grounds on which the subordinate judge has based his order and in our opinion they are altogether insufficient a receiver pending the disposal of the two suits these applications were disallowed by the subordinate judge in a long order

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 16 1912 (PC)

Sri Datla Venkata Suryanarayana Jagapati Raju Bahadur Garu and anr. Vs ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Oct-16-1912

Reported in: 17Ind.Cas.933; (1912)23MLJ699

in dispute on the 13th august 1906 they made an application under section 90 of the transfer of property act for

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 16 1912 (PC)

Sri Datla Venkata Suryanarayana Jagapati Raju Bahadur Garu and anr. Vs ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Oct-16-1912

Reported in: 17Ind.Cas.940

in dispute on the 13th august 1906 they made an application under section 90 of the transfer of property act for

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 30 1912 (PC)

Masirunnissa Khatun Vs. Joy Chand Lal Boyed and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Jul-30-1912

Reported in: 16Ind.Cas.238

182 of the second schedule of the limitation act governing applications for the execution of a decree in a civil court

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 25 1912 (PC)

Sakkarai Ambalagaran Vs. Sundilapathi Alias Subramanya Chetty

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jul-25-1912

Reported in: 16Ind.Cas.236

but it is contended that the legislature intended by the use of the word mortgage a document executed after the passing and their lordships decided that article 147 was limited in application to english mortgages such as are defined in section 58

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //