Use Based Application - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: use based application Year: 1988 Page 1 of about 669 results (0.713 seconds)Pee Kay Constructions Vs. Chandrasekhar Hegde
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Dec-14-1988
Reported in: ILR1989KAR241
..... as the petitioner is entitled to seek such relief based on legitimate expectation therefore i the proposed end use of the minerals by the applicant and ii the captive consumption and value addition ..... act specifically contemplates top take into consideration the investment which the applicants propose to make in the mines and the industries based on minerals and rule 35 of the m c rules .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBoos Vs. Barry
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Mar-22-1988
..... 454 u s 263 1981 evaluating a prohibition on the religious use of university buildings under the strict scrutiny applicable to content based regulations even though the prohibition was aimed at avoiding perceived ..... should continue to apply whereby any restriction on speech the application of which turns on the speech s content is content based regardless of its underlying motivation pp 485 u s 334 .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDet Norske Veritas Vs. Reserve Bank of India, Bombay and anr.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Apr-22-1988
Reported in: AIR1989Bom162; 1989MhLJ107
..... control and inspection of land based installations machinery and plant as well as inspection of machinery and engineering products intended for export in their application the petitioners pointed out that ..... light the petitioners had violated the conditions of it sense and license was being used to camouflage illegal transactions in foreign exchange in these circumstances the delhi high court .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTinspecting Commissioner of Vs. Vummidi Bangaru Chetty and Co.
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Madras
Decided on: Mar-11-1988
Reported in: (1988)27ITD561(Mad.)
..... and therefore has a limited application most enterprises customarily maintain certain minimum stock level at all times but that is not by itself a justification for use of base stock method because there ..... must exist clear circumstances to permit use of base stock method this was the passage relied on by .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTWatson Vs. Fort Worth Bank and Trust
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-29-1988
..... consistently used disparate treatment theory in which proof of intent to discriminate is required to review hiring or promotion decisions that were based on the exercise of personal judgment or the application of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSuraj Kund Temple and anr. Vs. Rama Kant and ors.
Court: Himachal Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-31-1988
Reported in: AIR1989HP59
..... the grounds and the facts on which the application is based or such applications shall as to the allegations of fact contained in such applications be verified by affidavit but merely because the ..... word shall had been used therein cannot make them mandatory .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTS.B. Mathur and ors. Vs. Chief Justice of Delhi High Court and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Aug-31-1988
Reported in: AIR1988SC2073; JT1988(3)SC507; 1988(2)SCALE615; 1989Supp(1)SCC34; [1988]Supp2SCR772; 1989(1)LC82(SC)
..... that promotion to such posts is to be based primarily on merit and not seniority alone in our view this decision has no application to the case before us because the words ..... bench of the allahabad high court in madan mohan saran case supra held that the use of the words selection irrespective of seniority shows that the field of eligibility takes within .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSmt. Keshar Vs. State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Nov-17-1988
Reported in: 1988(2)WLN696
who as per her own statement and as per the application of the police itself is major girl has expressed her
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. Canara Bank
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jun-10-1988
Reported in: [1989]175ITR601(KAR); [1989]175ITR601(Karn)
the scheme the offer is made to the prospective purchaser user to acquire indigenous machinery and defer payment in terms of whole transaction involving discounting and rediscounting of the bills is based upon a pre existing agreement between the parties including the defeat the decree that may be passed against him the application under order 38 rule 5 cannot be allowed on facts
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKansi Ram Vs. State of U.P.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jul-26-1988
Reported in: 1990Supp(1)SCC134
far as the second ground is concerned it is not based on any material whatsoever it is a bald assertion apart jailor mohd ibrahim these grounds betray a complete lack of application of mind on the part of the competent authority the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial