Use Based Application - Judgment Search Results

P.L. Basappa Vs. Siddamma

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: AIR1966Kant198; AIR1966Mys198; (1965)2MysLJ167

..... as the petitioner is entitled to seek such relief based on legitimate expectation therefore i the proposed end use of the minerals by the applicant and ii the captive consumption and value addition ..... act specifically contemplates top take into consideration the investment which the applicants propose to make in the mines and the industries based on minerals and rule 35 of the m c rules .....

United States Vs. Seeger

Court: US Supreme Court

..... merely personal moral code indeed at the outset each of them claimed in his application that his objection was based on a religious belief we have construed the statutory definition broadly and it ..... form have splintered into various denominations from 1940 to 1947 there were four denominations using the name friends selective service system monograph no 11 conscientious objection 13 1950 the church .....

General Motors Corp. Vs. District of Columbia

Court: US Supreme Court

..... of the authorizing statute does not permit the application of an apportionment formula which makes use of the sales factor alone the conclusion ..... to geographical distribution of plant payroll and sales the use of a formula based wholly on sales will result in multiple taxation and ..... any position on the constitutionality of a state income tax based on the sales factor alone for the present purpose it .....

Suba Singh and ors. Vs. Sadhu Singh Chuhar Singh and anr.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: AIR1966P& H518

..... 30 bom 56 about the various stages of a review application the following passage from the judgment of venkatasubba rao j may be usefully reproduced the question that arises is whether the order to ..... apparent mistake in it it was further pleaded that the judgment of the court was based on facts and could not be reviewed and the plaintiff could file an appeal 5 .....

Dr. Mrs. Joginder Kaur Malik and anr. Vs. Malik Anup Singh

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: AIR1966P& H385

..... kirpal singh the defendants also made a similar application and when both the applications were pending malik inder singh died on 11 ..... indian succession act of 1865 which corresponds to section 213 of the present act that judgment can have no applicability ..... held that even a defendant cannot use an unprobated will as a defence that decision was based on section 187 of the .....

National Bank of Lahore Ltd. Vs. Sohanlal Sehgal and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1965SC1663; [1965]35CompCas604(SC); (1965)67PLR127; [1965]3SCR293

were within time 13 even if the claim was solely based on the fraud committed by the managerduring the course of breach of the terms of thecontracts this article has no application and the appropriate article is art 115 which provides a

Brahm Dutt Sharma Vs. Life Insurance Corporation of India

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: AIR1966All474

..... the insurance policy in question clause 4 clearly provides that the application for the policy and statements made therein together with endorsements ..... section 30 was attracted to a case where the contract was based on fraud 20 after giving our anxious thought to the ..... account books and registers relating to the business of the factory used to be maintained but he pleaded his inability to produce .....

Moti Lal Bhagwan Das and ors. Vs. the Union of India and ors.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: AIR1965P& H444

included before considering the merits of the contentions it is useful to refer s 116 which runs 1 every person who of another these were problems involving manifold difficulties requiring the application of the mind of an authority whose stature and permanence

R. Venkataswami Naidu and anr. Vs. Narasram Naraindas

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1966SC361; [1966]1SCR110

..... subtenant during pendency of suit act of 1921 made applicable and tenants made application under section 9 for order of direction to ..... what they did andthis is where their principal error lay basing themselves on oneinterpretation of the section they held the covenant ..... was contended in sections 3 and 9 where building is used withoutany qualification and implies only a construction a preamble is .....

Principal, Patna College, Patna and ors. Vs. Kalyan Srinivas Raman

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1966SC707; 1966(0)BLJR207; [1966]1SCR974

education does no longer depend merely upon lectures as it used to do at one time in our country the second the fact that the petitioner postponed the filing of the application until sunday 18 4 1965 night and other relevant circumstances