Use Based Application - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: use based application Year: 1952 Page 1 of about 579 results (0.761 seconds)Munshi Lal Vs. Balmukund Singh
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Feb-26-1952
Reported in: AIR1953All231
..... of the execution application and not before the institution of the suit he has based his argument on the words used in section 14 ..... should have been served after the presentation of the execution application it is obvious that this could not be the intention ..... saying that the notice must be issued after presentation of execution application held section 14 requires existence of one of the grounds .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTLingangouda Marigouda Vs. Lingangouda Fakirgouda and ors.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jul-08-1952
Reported in: AIR1953Bom79; (1952)54BOMLR829; ILR1953Bom214
..... by defendant for use of plaintiff plaintiff s claim based on equity to portion of money received by defendant applicability of article 62 ..... preliminary objection is taken by mr hungund that no revision application lies because the decision of the district judge was a ..... difficulty i prefer not to express any opinion on this application because in my opinion even assuming i had jurisdiction under .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBabu Ram Vs. Dominion of India
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Mar-20-1952
Reported in: AIR1952P& H337
..... unjust inoperative and unenforceable the case before the trial court seems tohave turned upon the applicability of section240 of the government of india act it wasurged that the plaintiff having been ..... the facts of the case the plaint however contains no particulars on which theplaintiff based his assertion to use the languageof the prayer clause that the order of dismissaland the order of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Canara Bank Ltd. Vs. the Warden Insurance Co. Ltd.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jan-14-1952
Reported in: AIR1953Bom35; (1952)54BOMLR661; ILR1952Bom1083
..... therefore in our opinion unless the legislature expressly makes section 5 applicable section 5 does not apply when no period of limitation ..... bench rejected that contention and held that section 5 had no application and the learned chief justice observed p 577 it is ..... to all appeals proprio vigore and this argument is based upon the different language used by the legislature in section 3 and section 5 .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHiranand Ramsukh Vs. the State of Hyderabad.
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad
Decided on: Mar-01-1952
Reported in: 195426ITR608(Hyd.)
or without properly canvassing the true position in filing his applications for reference before a person not authorised to receive them
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTChhatu Lal Shaw Vs. Panchanan Shaw and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Apr-24-1952
Reported in: AIR1953Cal755,57CWN563
he would consider what orders should be passed on the application for amendment 3 in the first place we are clearly
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPannalal Sen Vs. Lakshmisona Pyne and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: May-12-1952
Reported in: AIR1952Cal840,56CWN597
..... clear that these anomalies and undesirable consequences must necessarily follow from their applications 32 the terms of order 21 rule 89 are in my ..... the other part of the judgment of the patna decision is based mainly if not entirely on the observation of rankin j in ..... the rule which immediately follows order 21 rule 89 and which uses the expression the decree holder or any person entitled to share .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPuthiya Purayil Puthanpurayil UssaIn Vs. Pavayi Kunhiraman and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-24-1952
Reported in: AIR1953Mad419; (1953)IMLJ132
another desom and a fresh survey number that application was based on the allegation that there was a mistake made by have taken into consideration the fact that since an earlier application for the same relief had been dismissed another petition was
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDurga Prasad Vs. the State
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jan-18-1952
Reported in: 1952CriLJ1225
..... the civil judge first class betul decided to prosecute durga prasad applicant for using a forged document and also for perjury and for setting up ..... has set aside the conviction and sentence passed on the accused applicant before us because in his opinion the trial judge had acted ..... fall for consideration here the case decided by graer j was based on the dictum laid down in the madras high court that .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBaldeo Dass Vs. Joshi Gauri Dutt and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Sep-18-1952
Reported in: AIR1953All329
new matter in the controversy thereupon the petitioner made an application for permission to withdraw the suit with liberty to bring
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial