Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: trade unions act 1926 chapter i preliminary Page 22 of about 4,907 results (0.275 seconds)

Aug 11 1995 (HC)

Akhil Maharashtra Kamgar Union Vs. Warden and Co. Ltd. and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1998)IIILLJ578Bom

..... september, 1994 made in complaint (ulp) no. 166 of 1993 under the maharashtra recognition of trade unions and prevention of unfair labour practices act, 1971 (hereinafter referred to as 'the act'). 2. the petitioner is a registered trade union which represents some of the workmen working in the industrial establishment of the first respondent at wagle ..... shramik utkarsh sabha reproduces the contention of the learned counsel for the appellant to the effect that the bir act and the maharashtra recognition of trade unions and prevention of unfair labour practices acts operate in different fields. paragraph 12 reproduces the contention of the respondent. in paragraph 13 the supreme ..... to represent the employees of the concerned industry in complaints relation to unfair labour practices under the maharashtra recognition of trade unions and prevention of unfair labour practices act, 1971 (mrtu & pulp act) other than those specified in items 2 and 6 of schedule iv thereof?' at once it is obvious .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 20 1982 (HC)

T.C.C. Thozhilali Union Vs. T.C.C. Ltd.

Court : Kerala

Reported in : (1982)ILLJ425Ker

..... gave way to collective bargaining, who would speak for the collective body of workmen? legislature stepped in and enacted the trade unions act, 1926, which provides for registration of trade unions and defines the law relating to registered trade unions. under section 13 of that act, every registered trade union is a body corporate with power to acquire and hold movable and immovable property and to contract; and can sue and ..... t.c.c. thozhilali union (hereinafter, the union) is a trade union registered under the trade union act, 1926. some of the workers of the travancore cochin chemicals ltd. (for brevity, the company) are members of this union. according to the company this union and another union together represent only 5.8% of the total number of the company's workers or less. as averred by the union in its plaint 'sufficient .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 14 2015 (HC)

J.B. Mangharam Mazdoor Sangh Thr Vs. J.B. Mangharam Karmchari Union Th ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... to filing of the writ petition, briefly stated, are that petitioner is a registered. trade union under the trade unions act, 1926. the petitioner as well as respondent no.1 are the trade unions registered under the provisions of the trade unions act. it is the case of the petitioner that respondent no.1 is a union sponsored by the management of the undertaking and is no longer enjoying the support and ..... faith of the majority of the workmen of the industry. the petitioner-union submitted an application .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 01 1995 (HC)

Sakhar Kamgar Union Vs. Shri Chhatrapati Rajaram Sahakari Sakhar Karkh ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 1996(2)BomCR49; [1996(74)FLR1956]; (1996)IILLJ134Bom

..... under the provisions of section 28 read with items 9 and 10 of schedule iv of the maharashtra recognition of trade unions and prevention of unfair labour practices act, 1971 (hereinafter referred to as the act). 2. the 1st respondent is a co-operative society manufacturing sugar in kasaba bhavada, district kolhapur. the petitioner ..... is a registered trade union representing the employees working in the 1st respondent sugar factory. 3. the petitioner filed complaint (ulp) ..... the industrial court is not only erroneous, but also contrary to the intendment of the parliament. the contract labour (regulation and abolition) act, 1970, is an act brought on the statute book 'to regulate the employment of contract labour in certain establishments and to provide for its abolition in certain .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 18 1968 (HC)

Southern Railway Mazdoor Union (by Its General Secretary, P. Govinda M ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1970)ILLJ83Mad

..... september 196s, withdrawing recognition to the petitioner-union.2. the petitioner is a trade union registered on 13 february 1961 under the provisions of the trade unions act, 1926. classes iii and iv employees of the southern railway are members of the petitioner-union and the strength of membership of the petitioner-union as on 31 december 1967 is 43,737 ..... . the petitioner-union was recognized by the railway by its order dated 21 ..... be given an opportunity before its recognition is withdrawn. according to the railway, the withdrawal of the recognition was for due cause and the petitioner-union cannot complain that it was not given an opportunity.6. the question that arises for consideration is the effect of para. 3610 of the indian railway .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 17 1982 (SC)

Board of Trustees of the Port of Bombay Vs. Dilipkumar Raghavendranath ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1983SC109; (1983)ILLJ1SC; 1983MhLJ1(SC); 1982(2)SCALE1097; (1983)1SCC124; [1983]1SCR828; 1983(1)SLJ256(SC); 1982(14)LC897(SC)

..... the employee is a class iii or a class iv employee, of an 'office bearer' as defined in clause (d) of section 2 of the trade unions act, 1926 (16 of 1926) of the union to which he belongs, to present the case on his, behalf, but may not engage a legal practitioner for the purpose unless the said presenting officer ..... connection, we would like to refer to a weighty observation on this point where despite constitutional inhibition this court conceded such a right. in k. roy v. union of india : 1982crilj340 the learned chief justice while rejecting the contention that a detenu should be entitled to appear through a legal adviser before the advisory board observed ..... a corollary it cannot be said that in such an enquiry against a workman natural justice demands that he ought to be represented by a representative of his union much less a member of the legal profession. while buttressing this approach, an observation was made that unless rules prescribed for holding the enquiry do not make .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 20 1996 (HC)

Municipal Mazdoor Union Vs. Municipal Commissioner and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : [1997(75)FLR409]; (1997)IILLJ309Bom

..... admission to the screening test for the post of ward officer, bombay municipal corporation (bmc). the petitioner is a trade union registered under the trade unions act, 1926, representing a large number of bmc employees. the petitioner union has filed this petition for and on behalf of pest control officers working in the insecticide branch of the health department ..... pest control officer is permitted while the pest control officers are denied admission to the screening test by applying wholly arbitrary criteria of pay scale. the union points out that persons working in the state government and semi-government organisations drawing the minimum basic pay scale of rs. 2,000/- are allowed for ..... pest control officers are denied even basic right to appear for the test by fixing a criteria of higher pay scale. it is contended by the union that criteria of minimum basic pay scale is clearly discriminatory, arbitrary and unreasonable. it is also contended that the criteria should not be the pay .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 24 1994 (SC)

Dr. M. Ismail Faruqui Etc, Mohd. Aslam, Hargyan Singh, Thakur Vijay Ra ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1995SC605A

..... , was substituted by the constitution ' (seventh amendment) act to read as under:-acquisition and requisitioning of property. before the constitution (seventh amendment) act, the relevant entries read as follows:-list i, entry 33 :acquisition or requisitioning of property for the purposes of the union.list ii, entry 36 :acquisition or requisitioning of property ..... , except for the purposes of the union, subject to the provisions of entry 42 of ..... upheld the sovereign power of the state to acquire property. b. k. mukherjee, j. (as he then was) held in chiranjitlal chowdhuri v. union of india : [1950]1scr869 as under:it is a right inherent in every sovereign to take and appropriate private property belonging to individual citizens for public .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 25 1994 (HC)

Shaik MohiddIn Vs. Section Officer, Karnataka Electricity Board, Kaiwa ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 1995(1)ALT(Cri)438; 1994CriLJ3689; ILR1994KAR2513; 1994(4)KarLJ147

..... 734 of 1994, the complainant here is a factory engaged in the manufacture of pharmaceutical formulations and life saving drugs. accused 1 is a trade union registered under the trade union act, 1926 and other accused are its members working in the complainant's factory. the last settlement entered into between the employees of the factory and the ..... management was on 29-7-1990. thereafter, the accused-union gave a charter of demands which are pending discussion. on 6-9-1993 the union had ..... proceedings for contempt of courts. the high courts could adopt any procedure subject to its fairness and affording reasonable opportunity for defence. the two previous acts of 1926 and of 1952 recognised that power of the high courts. the procedure followed by the high courts was deemed established by law within the meaning .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 05 2002 (HC)

Galla Mandi Mahila Shramik Sangh Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR2002MP266; 2002(4)MPLJ110

..... to be stated for disposal of this writ petition are that the petitioner is a registered society under the provisions of trade unions act, 1926 having its registered office in the district of satna. it is affiliated to indian national trade union congress. the aims and objects of the society are to make endeavour for well being of the women labourers and ..... lordships struck down the provision which stipulated the condition that services shall be terminated on her first pregnancy as unconstitutional. 12. in the case of lena khan v. union of india, air 1987 sc 1515, the regulation which required the air hostess employed to retire at the age of 35 years with extension upto the age of ..... founded on the backdrop of sex. the court declared the action has violative of articles 14 and 15 of the constitution. 10. in the case of bombay labour union v. jnternational franchises, p. ltd., air 1966 sc 942, the apex court axed down the restriction imposed on the employment of the married woman. in the case .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //