Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: trade unions act 1926 chapter i preliminary Page 27 of about 4,907 results (0.144 seconds)

Indian Jute Mills Association Vs. Wealth-tax Officer.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : [1984]8ITD757(Cal)

..... upon members shall be credited to be general fund. no expenditure from such fund shall be made in contravention of section 15 of the indian trade unions act, 1926, and subject to this restriction all moneys received on account of contributions, subscriptions or otherwise may be applied towards carrying out the objects of the ..... a distinct personality capable of regulating the inter se relationship between the different corporate bodies, who are its members. however, under section 13 of the trade unions act, 1926, the association is a body corporate with powers to acquire and hold both movable and immovable properties. accordingly, the ratio of the full bench decision ..... subhas road, calcutta, has been stated to be an association established to protect, forward and defend the trade of the members of the association. the said association has been registered under the indian trade unions act - xvi, 1926.2. the wto initiated wealth-tax proceedings by the issue of notices under section 17 of the .....

Mrf Mazdoor Sangh Vs. the Commissioner of Labour and Four Othe

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... to those referred to in the notice issued under the proviso to section10of the act: the trade unions act, 1926 is an act to provide for the registration of trade unions and, in certain respects, to define the law relating to registered trade unions. the said act regulates the right of workmen to register themselves as a trade union. though a legislative policy may be expressed in a statute, it must provide a ..... to attend/ participate/represent in the enquiry; though no statutory right is conferred under the provisions of the trade union act, 1926, principles of natural justice would require the complainant to be heard; the provisions of the trade unions act, 1926 are equally silent on the aspect of hearing the office bearers of the trade union in an enquiry for cancellation of their registration; if the office bearers of the .....

The Zuari Industries Ltd. Vs. State of Goa Through the Chief Secretary ...

Court : Mumbai Goa

..... insist for the reference, when as per the above mentioned provisions it has no right in the eye of law for its registration as trade union under the trade unions act, 1926. 11. shri shivan dessai, learned advocate for the respondents no.4 to 9, 21 and 22 has submitted that the arguments made ..... on behalf of the petitioner-industry to challenge the order of reference, are misdirected. according to the learned advocate, the order of reference was challenged mainly on the ground that the workers' union ..... . in the meantime, the registrar of trade unions revoked the registration certificate of the workers' union by an order dated 6th august, 2004 on the ground that the workers' union did not meet the requirement of 10 % membership as required by section 9a of the trade unions act. 7. the employees' union submitted a charter of demands on 10th january .....

Indian Hotel and Restaurant Association (Ahar) General Secretary Vs. T ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... the president thereof has been authorised to file the writ petition. the petitioner in writ petition (civil) no.119 of 2017 is the bhartiya bargirls union, registered under the trade union act, 1926 and represented through its hony. president. the petition is filed in a representative capacity on behalf of a large number of women dancers, singers and ..... hotel owners and bar owners and/or conductors of the same, who carry on business of running restaurants and bars in mumbai and is duly registered under the trade unions act. petitioner no.2 is the secretary of petitioner no.1 and is a citizen of india, who runs a restaurant and bar. the petitioner in writ petition ..... another v. state of m.p.2, which was relied upon in the subsequent judgment in engineering kamgar union v. electro steels castings ltd. and another3 wherein it was held as under:"21. the central act and the state act indisputably cover the same field. the jurisdiction of the state legislature to enact a law by a parliamentary .....

Ajabrao Sambhaji Bhagat Vs. Y.A. Khatke, Chairman, Pandt Staff Co-op. ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1986)IILLJ430Bom; 1986MhLJ371

..... petitioner, in his capacity as working president of the all india p & t employees federation, which is a registered trade union, had preferred a reference under s. 25(2) of the maharashtra recognition of trade unions & prevention of unfair labour practices act, 1971 (hereinafter referred as 'the act'), before the labour court, nagpur. by the said reference, the petitioner sought declaration that the lock-out of ..... which are irrelevant. the petitioner, however, contended that the labour court, by its powers well defined under ss. 30(1) and 30(2) of the act, was fully justified in granting interim relief in favour of the trade union workers.6. shri s. v. natu, counsel for respondent no. 1, on the other hand, supported the impugned judgment and pointed out that s .....

D.Thomas Franco Rajendra Dev Vs. Disciplinary Authority and Circle Dev ...

Court : Chennai

..... was to be given, then it would virtually stand in the way of exercise of the statutory rights conferred on unions to hold demonstrations and meetings within the scope of trade union act, 1926. demonstrations like pendown strike, refusal to work, though inside factory or office, wearing badges, etc., were permissible under the ..... act and found acceptance in the decisions of the apex court. in the circumstances, going by the decision of this court reported ..... be mixed up with duties as officers of the bank, especially when the conduct of demonstrations were in accordance with the rights conferred under the trade union act. thus the writ petitioners stoutly denied the allegation that they had committed misconduct demanding disciplinary proceedings. in the face of the reply thus given, .....

Gujarat Mazdoor Sabha Vs. The State of Gujarat

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... july 20202. similar in content, the new notification extended the exemption granted to factories from 20 july 2020 till 19 october 2020. b3grounds of challenge the first petitioner is a trade union registered under the trade unions act, 1926 and represents about ten thousand workers employed in factories and industrial establishments in the state of gujarat. the second petitioner is a federation of registered ..... trade unions and represents a hundred thousand workmen in factories and establishments across india. 2 both the notifications dated 17 april 2020 and 20 july 2020 were issued by the labour and .....

Khajjan Singh and Others Vs. State of Haryana and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... (16 of 1926), or not, shall commit any unfair labour practice. 25u. penalty for committing unfair labour practices any person who ..... act, 1947 does not contain a provision like section 30 of the mrtu & pulp act in maharashtra. unfair labour practice in the central act are placed in chapter vc. section 25t and 25u deal with prohibition and penalty for committing unfair labour practice. the provisions read : - 25t. prohibition of unfair labour practice no employer or workman or a trade union, whether registered under the trade unions act, 1926 ..... bench of the supreme court dealt with the state law of maharashtra cited as the maharasthra recognition of trade unions and prevention of unfair labour practice act, 1971 (mrtu & pulp act). the court dealt with section 21(1) and its proviso; schedule iv items 2, 5, 6 .....

Textile Kamgar Sanghatana and Others Vs. Hon'ble Member, Industrial Co ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

..... applications have been rejected. 3. the respondent no.2 is an industry wherein its employees have formed petitioner no. 1 trade union registered under the provisions of trade union act, 1926. the service conditions of the employees of the respondent no. 2 industry are governed by various agreements/settlements between the industry ..... and elected representatives of the employees. an earlier agreement dated 07.07.2009 was for the period from 01.11.2008 to 31.10.2011. after expiry of aforesaid agreement, in absence of any representative union ..... attracted in the facts of the present case. in shivanand gaurishankar (supra), while considering the status and position of a representative union under the said act, the supreme court referred to its earlier decisions in girija shankar kashi ram vs. gujrat spinning and weaving co. ltd. 1962 .....

National Aviation Co. of India Ltd. Vs. Mumbai Mazdoor Sangh and Anoth ...

Court : Mumbai

..... the definition of 'state' within meaning assigned to this term under article 12 of the constitution of india. 3] respondent no.1 is a trade union registered under the trade unions act, 1926 comprising inter alia employees of erstwhile indian airlines ltd. 4] respondent no.1 purporting to espouse the cause of the almost 1269 casual workers raised ..... portion of which reads as follows: 18. considering the entire record and keeping in mind the discussion made above, i conclude that the demand of the union for regularization and permanent absorption with the company is not justified. however, the company has to include the names of all the workmen under reference after verifying ..... to exercise any incidental or ancillary powers. the ruling in the case of jaipurspinning and weaving mills, ltd. vs. jaipur spinning and weaving mills, ltd., mazdoor union and anr. (1959 llj 656), which deals with the powers of a tribunal to make interim award by the exercise of incidental and ancillary powers, is .....