Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: trade unions act 1926 chapter i preliminary Page 1 of about 4,907 results (0.276 seconds)

Firm Tulsiram Sadanand Sarda Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Labour, Nag ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1961)63BOMLR342; [1961(3)FLR131]; (1961)ILLJ711Bom

..... be construed as an industry within the meaning of the act. 16. chapter i of the central provinces and berar industrial disputes settlement act, 1947, deals with preliminary matters and enacts definitions. chapter ii deals with recognized unions. section 2(28) defines union as meaning a trade unions registered under the indian trade union act, 1926 (xvi of 1926). under the trade unions act the trade union is a combination, temporary or permanent, formed primarily for ..... the purpose of regulating relations between the workmen and the employers and it could be registered only on an application of seven or more members of the trade union and by subscribing their .....

Sunil Prakash Sharma S/O Late Suraj Prakash Sharma Vs. Central Bank of ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2007(2)AWC1194; [2007(113)FLR88]; (2007)2LLJ1005All

..... india organisation to which such union is affiliated. however, clause (iii) thereof reads as under:iii. with ..... facing disciplinary proceedings may be represented by a registered trade union of the bank employees of which he is a member and in case he is not a member of the trade union of the bank employees, by a representative of a registered trade union or at the request of a trade union, by the representative of the state federation or all ..... in view of the provisions of section 18 of the industrial disputes act, 1947. the said clause provides that a lawyer may be engaged as a defence nominee only with the permission of the bank otherwise the employee can be represented through the registered trade union and as such the order of rejection of his application for seeking .....

Insolvency And Bankruptcy Board Of India Vs. Satyanarayan Bankatlal Ma ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... were working solely within the premises of the respective owners.32. in the case of mahindra and mahindra ltd. (supra), section 55 of the monopolies and restrictive trade practices act, 1969 ( mrtp act, 1969 for short) provided that any person aggrieved by an order made by the commission under section 13 may prefer an appeal to the supreme court on one ..... madras vs nathella sampathu chetty and anr.7, new central jute mills co. ltd. vs. assistant collector of central excise, allahabad & ors.8, and ujagar prints and others vs union of india and others9, he submits that what has to be taken into consideration is the plain language 7 (1962) 3 scr7868 (1970) 2 scc8209 (1989) 3 scc48811 used ..... . learned asg in this respect refers to the judgments of this court in the cases of bolani ores ltd. vs state of orissa1 and mahindra and mahindra ltd. vs union of india and another2. 1 (1974) 2 scc7772 (1979) 2 scc5297 7. learned asg further submits that the code has been held to be a complete code in .....

Survodaya Mills Workers Union Vs. State of Karnataka and Others

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1994Kant256; ILR1994KAR687

..... and a writ petition is pending before this court in that behalf. it is stated that the 6th respondent has entered into a settlement with another trade union, which is also a subject matter in another writ petition. it is also not in dispute that the 6th respondent has constructed certain quarters and in ..... the public interest. in this context, sri k. subbarao, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, submits that the petitioner is a recognised and registered trade union exposing the cause of the workmen in the 6th respondent industry. that, in the year 1984 immediately after election a charter of demands was submitted to the ..... the act, opposed to public policy and injuries to public interest.17. in this context, sri k. subba rao, learned counsel for the petitioner, derives support from the following decisions- : (1983)illj45sc .in fertilizer corporation kamagar union (regd.) sindri v. union of india, air 1981 sc 344 : (1980 lab ic 1367), the question whether the trade union .....

Jalindar Ganpat Lawate and Another Vs. Pravara Medical Trust, Loni, at ...

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

..... ahmed shaikh. (b) to hear and decide both the revision petitions in accordance with law and the scheme of the maharashtra recognition of trade unions and prevention of unfair labour practices act, 1971. (c) to note that this court has not considered the merits involved in the two revision petitions and has left all points ..... is, as to "whether the industrial court can refuse to register a revision (ulp) filed under section 44 of the maharashtra recognition of trade unions and prevention of unfair labour practices act, 1971?" about writ petition no.6396 of 2012 4. the petitioner in this petition is taking exception to the impugned order dated 7.7 ..... on its merits and without issuing notice to the respondents. 18. section 44 of the maharashtra recognition of trade unions and prevention of unfair labour practices act, 1971 (for the sake of brevity, hereinafter referred to as "the act of 1971") reads as under:- "44. industrial court to exercise superintendence over labour courts. - the industrial .....

Manoj Amdas Ingle and ors. Vs. Member, Industrial Court and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : [2004(102)FLR584]; 2004(3)MhLj41

..... learned industrial court by moving the complaints under item nos. 6 and 9 of schedule iv of the maharashtra recognition of trade unions and prevention of unfair labour practices act, 1971 (hereinafter referred as the act) praying for direction to the respondent/company to make them regular and permanent from 1-4-1996 by giving all monetary ..... (a) and item 4(a) and (b) of schedule ii of the said act, which read as under :--'1. to interfere with, restrain or coerce employees in the exercise of their right to organise, form, join or assist a trade union and to engage in concerned activities for the purposes of collective bargaining or other mutual ..... the management does not interfere in the rivalries of the union and encourage or discourage a particular union by threatening the employees to join or not to join a particular union. admittedly, the terminations in the present case are not related to encouragement or discouragement of trade unions and as such, the said items of schedule ii, which .....

Nav Bharat Hindi Daily, Nagpur Vs. Nav Bharat Shramik Sangha and Anoth ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : [1982]134ITR655a(Bom); (1985)ILLJ474Bom; 1984MhLJ483

..... published by 'navbharat press', nagpur, a registered partnership firm. respondent no. 1, hereinafter referred to as the respondent was at the relevant time a registered trade union of workmen engaged in navbharat press. till the year 1968-69 the work of composing was mainly done by hand compositors. in the same year the petitioner purchased ..... infraction of mandatory provisions as contained in s. 25g of the act; (iii) that the decision of the management to retrench as many as thirteen compositors was arbitrary and thoughtless; (iv) that retrenchment of workmen was mala fide amounting to victimisation for legitimate trade union activities and (v) that the reference was proper and legal. ..... followed.11. in this connection the supreme court had an occasion to consider whether the provisions of s. 25f(c) of the act were mandatory or directory in nature. in the case of bombay union of journalists v. state of bombay : (1964)illj351sc . this decision lays down that unlike clauses (a) and (b) of .....

Raj Kumar Kishorepuria Vs. General Manager, Securities and Exchange Bo ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : IV(2005)BC538,[2005]127CompCas18(Cal),(2005)4CompLJ525(Cal),[2005]63SCL1(Cal)

..... cause why proceedings should not be initiated against him under the securities and exchange board of india act, 1992, section 11b, read with the securities and exchange board of india (prohibition of fraudulent and unfair trade practices relating to securities market) regulations, 1995, regulation 12, and the securities and exchange board of ..... petitioner, the board would be empowered to take action in terms of regulation 11 of the new regulations. she refers me to passages from treatise and the decisions in union of india and anr. v. g.m. kokil and ors. : (1984)iillj20sc , chandravarkar sita ratna rao v ashalata s. guram : [1986]3scr866 , ..... contains regulations 1 and 2 dealing with short title and commencement, and definitions respectively. the second chapter, with the heading 'prohibition of fraudulent and unfair trade practices relating to the securities market', again has only two regulations (regulations 3 and 4). while regulation 3 enumerates what a person dealing in securities shall .....

Shivaji Ramsing Rajput and ors. Vs. Ravalgaon Sugar Farm Ltd. and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : [1995(70)FLR744]; (1996)ILLJ42Bom

..... 2.5.1986 made in complaints (ulp) nos. 212 to 226 of 1984 under the provisions of the maharashtra recognition of trade unions and prevention of unfair labour practices act, 1971 (hereinafter referred to as 'the act'). 2. the relevant facts required for disposal of this writ petition are : the first respondent is an industrial establishment covered by ..... other 12 employees were employed as non-seasonal permanent employees. the petitioners moved their complaints by invoking items 5, 6 and 9 of schedule iv of the act and alleged that giving the status of non-seasonal permanent employees to the other 12 junior employees situated on equal footing, for no good reason, was an ..... appears to have dismissed the complaints on the ground that the petitioners being seasonal permanent employees were not employees under section 3(13) of the bombay relations act. without expressing any view on the merits of the case as to the unfair labour practice made out in the complaints of the petitioners, i am .....

Machindra S/O Rambhu Chavan and ors. Vs. Ahmednagar Forging Ltd. and a ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (2003)105BOMLR259

..... unfair labour practices under the maharashtra recognition of trade unions and prevention of unfair labour practices act. in the said complaint, the respondent no. 1 moved an application and contended that the complaint is not maintainable as there is a ..... industrial law by the workmen, wherein the cause of action is one and not separate. normally an industrial dispute is raised by workmen collectively through a trade union as and when a. grievance is the same and/or the action affects of the workmen. learned counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance on the ..... m/s. ahmednagar forging ltd., a registered company, whereas petitioner no. 278 is a registered trade union. the respondent no. 1 is a company engaged in manufacturing of engineering goods and the respondent no. 2 is a recognised union. a complaint came to be filed by the present petitioners alleging indulgence by the respondents, in .....