Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: trade unions act 1926 chapter i preliminary Page 19 of about 4,907 results (0.170 seconds)

North-east Frontier Railway Mazdoor Union Vs. the General Manager, Nor ...

Court : Guwahati

..... the north-east frontier rly. mizdoor union and the general secretary of the said union by telegram and a letter of the same date that the recognition of the union was withdrawn.2. the petitioner's case is that it is a trade union of non-gazetted employees, registered under the indian trade union act, 1926 and that it was accorded recognition ..... of the railway. they allege that the petitioner however adopted methods other than those specified for ventilating their alleged grievances. they also deny that the petitioner union acted in conformity to the rules for recognition of service association of non-gazetted railway servants. the respondents submit that the strike launched on 19.9.68 was ..... associations contained in part b of appendix xiii and the conditions precedent to the recognition of a union by a railway administration contained in part c thereof.8. a railway servant becomes a member of a trade union with a view to protect his interests in the service as well as to share the fruits .....

Indian Express Newspapers (Bom) Employees Union Vs. K.M. Desai and ors ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : [1995(71)FLR54]

..... english dailies, loksatta, which is a marathi daily and samakalin, a gujarati daily. it also publishes english weekly screen and marathi weekly lokprabha. 3. the petitioners are a trade union registered under the trade union act, 1926 and have been representing the working journalists and non-journalists employed with respondent no. 3 since 1953. it claims to have as its members an overwhelming majority of the ..... employees of respondent no. 3. in 1981, respondent no. 2. maharashtra general kamgar union, which is also a trade union registered under the trade unions act, enrolled some of the employees of respondent no. 3 .....

Rashtriya Colliery Mazdoor Congress and anr. Vs. South Eastern Coalfie ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : (2010)ILLJ46MP

..... /227 of the constitution of india was the action of respondent, south eastern coalfields limited, of stopping the structural meetings under the industrial relations systems with the petitioner, a trade union registered under trade unions act, 1926, at unit sub area and company head quarter level. the petitioners also challenge the order/circular dated july 14, 2007 issued by general manager (ir/legal) of the respondent ..... of hearing the petitioners have confined their challenge to the issue of withdrawal of check-off facility.2. the relevant facts briefly are that the petitioner is a trade union registered under the provisions of trade unions act, 1926. initially it was the chhatisgarh colliery workers federation, manendragarh and thereafter underwent series of changes, it is now known as, rashtriya colliery mazdoor congress; claiming to have .....

Bajirao Rajaram Patil Vs. Maharashtra State Co-operative Bank Ltd. and ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 1997(2)BomCR577; (1996)98BOMLR702; [1997(75)FLR320]; (1997)ILLJ781Bom; 1997(1)MhLj526

..... and employees in certain matter and to consolidate and amend the law in relation to the settlement of industrial disputes. the m.r.t.u. and p.u.l.p. act was enacted to provide for the recognition of trade unions for facilitating collective bargaining for certain undertakings; to state their rights and obligations; to confer certain powers on unrecognised ..... to another covered under them 3, of schedule iv of the maharashtra recognition of trade unions and prevention of unfair labour practices act, 1971 (for short, 'm.r.t.u. and p.u.l.p. act, 1971') could be filed by such affected employee or has to be filed by recognised union 5. the aforesaid question arises in the following manner. the petitioner (for short .....

Dattatraya Shankarrao Kharde and ors. Vs. Executive Engineer, Chief Ga ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1994)ILLJ395Bom; 1994(1)MhLj776

..... 30, 1984 their services were terminated with effect from august 31, 1984. ny filling applications (complaint cases) under section 28 of the maharashtra recognition of trade unions and prevention of unfair labour practices act, 1971 (for short 'the act') before the learned industrial court, amraoti, they challenged their orders of termination on the ground that in terminating their services, the respondents have committed an ..... employer with regard to the conditions of service applicable to the employee, is absent in such collective bargaining agreements arrived at between the trade union representing its members, or if it is a representative union having authority under the above acts to represent all the employees. in awards there is an element of compulsion since it is by adjudication which is binding under the .....

Waman Pundlikrao Deshmukh Vs. Shivaji Agriculture College, Amravati

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 1996(1)BomCR640; [1995(71)FLR1021]; (1996)IIILLJ596Bom; 1995(2)MhLj342

..... the main complaint itself at the time of deciding the interim application under section 30(2) of the maharashtra recognition of trade unions and prevention of unfair labour practices act, 1971 (for short 'the unfair labour practices act'). 2. nobody, appeared on behalf of the respondent. 3. after hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner, i find ..... it would be seen that the petitioner filed a complaint before the industrial court, amravati, under section 28 read with schedule iv of the unfair labour practices act. 1971, praying that the order dated july the 31, 1990 issued by the respondent be set aside and the respondent be restrained from changing the present ..... court did not find any prima facie case in favour of the complainant, the application for interim relief under section 30(2) of the unfair labour practices act, 1971, could have been dismissed. 6. admittedly, no enquiry has been conducted by the industrial court nor the complainant was afforded any opportunity to lead any .....

O.N.G.C. Mazdoor Sangh Vs. O.N.G.C. Ltd. and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (2002)2GLR1295

..... that the trade union is an authenticated body; the names and occupation of whose officer-bearers also become known ..... the principal raison d'etre of the trade unions. however, to see that the trade union, which takes up the matter concerning service conditions of the workmen truly represents the workmen employed in the establishment, the trade union is first required to get itself registered under the provisions of the trade unions act, 1926. this gives a stamp of due formation of the trade union and assures the mind of the employer .....

Municipal Corporation of City of Amravati Vs. Ashok Ramkrishna Kamble ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1998)IIILLJ212Bom; 1994(1)MhLj1004

..... .12.1992 initially the four incumbents filed a complain under the provisions of section 28 of the maharashtra recognition of trade unions and prevention of unfair labour practices act (hereinafter referred to as the m. r. t. u. and p. u. l. p. act). these complaints came to be registered as ulp complaints nos. 10 of 1993 to 13 of 1993. the respondents also ..... ). section 28 of the m.r.t.u. and p.u.l.p. act, 1971 provides the procedure for dealing with the complaints with regard to unfair labour practice and distastes that where any person has engaged in or is engaging in nay unfair labour practice, then any union or any employee or any employer or any investigating officer may, within ninety .....

Forbes Forbes Campbell and Co. Ltd. Vs. M.G. Chitale

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1979)81BOMLR1; 1977MhLJ869

..... manufacturing rectified power plants and other electrical items. on december 15, 1975, respondent no. 2 (engineering mazdoor sabha, a trade union registered under the trade. unions act, 1926, representing workers in engineering industry/trade in greater bombay) filed an application in the prescribed form (being mrtu no. 39 of 1975) for registration as a recognised ..... commencement or continuation of a strike which is deemed to be illegal under this act; or(vi) that its registration under the trade unions act, 1926, is cancelled; or(vii) that another union has been recognised in place of a union recognised under this chapter.it will appear very clear that section 13 sets out ..... the total number of employees employed in the undertaking. further the expression 'union' occurring in that section must be a union as defined in section 3(17), that is to say, must be a trade union registered under the trade unions act, 1926 and secondly the minimum 30 per cent, membership spoken of by that section .....

Association of Engineering Workers, Through its General Secretary, San ...

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

..... the commencement or continuation of a strike which is deemed to be illegal under this act; or (vi) that its registration under the trade unions act, 1926, (xvi of 1926) is cancelled; or (vii) that another union has been recognised in place of a union recognised under this chapter. (2) the industrial court may cancel the recognition of a ..... union if, after giving notice to such union to show cause why its recognition should not be ..... submissions of shri shahane, learned advocate for the petitioner can be summarized, in brief, as follows:- (a) the petitioner is a registered union at mumbai under the trade union's act, 1926 on 16.10.1958. (b) the petitioner was granted recognition by the industrial court, ahmednagar on 17.6.1995. (c) several settlements .....