Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: trade unions act 1926 chapter i preliminary Court: punjab and haryana Page 1 of about 77 results (0.121 seconds)

Sep 02 2004 (HC)

Haryana Financial Corporation Vs. Presiding Officer, Labour Court-cum- ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (2005)IILLJ572P& H

..... means any of the practices specified in the fifth schedule.25-t. prohibition of unfair labour practice.- no employer or workman or a trade union, whether registered under the trade unions act, 1926 (16 of 1926), or not, shall commit any unfair labour practice.25-u. penalty for committing unfair labour practices.- any person who commits any unfair labour ..... to six months or with fine which may extend to one thousand rupees or with both.entry 10 of fifth schedulei. on the part of employers and trade unions of employeesxx xx xx10. to employ workmen as 'badlis', casuals or temporaries and to continue them as such for years, with the object of depriving ..... useful to notice the legislative developments in this regard. side by side, we may refer to some of the important judicial precedents. the trade industrial disputes act, 1929 and the industrial disputes act, 1947 (as originally enacted) did not contain the definition of the term 'retrenchment'. in 1953, the government of india, in the wake .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 01 1987 (HC)

Parkash Singh Badal and ors. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1987P& H263

..... chooses to push them. xx xx xx'19. in osborne's case, (1910 ac 87) (supra), amalgamated society of railway servants, a society registered under the trade union act, framed a rule authorising it to levy contribution from members for the purpose of securing parliamentary representation. another rule provided that all candidates to be financed by the society ..... said rule was affirmed by the earl of halsbury and lords macnaghten and atkinson on the ground that a rule which purports to confer on any trade union registered under the act of 1871 a power to levy contributions from members for the purpose of securing parliamentary representation, whether it be an original rule of the ..... union or a rule subsequently introduced by amendment, is ultra vires and illegal and by lord james of hereform because one of the rules in question would .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 27 1958 (HC)

Delite Cinema and ors. Vs. Rameshwar Dyal and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1959P& H189

..... he is a member of the executive to which the management of the affairs of a trade union is entrusted within section 2(a) of the indian trade unions act, 1928. that being so, he is an 'officer' of the trade union as defined in section 2(b) of the indian trade unions act, 1926. this is not disputed. that being so, shri harish chander can represent the workmen under section ..... 36 of the industrial disputes act, 1947.the learned counsel for the petitioner has, however, argued that if .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 04 1954 (HC)

Parkash Textile Mills Ltd. Vs. Mani Lal and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1955P& H197

..... 1949 fc 111 (d).12. in -- 'saskatchewan labour relations board v. john east iron works ltd.', 1949 ac 134 (f), me distinction between a 'board' constituted under the trade unions act and a 'court' was given in the following words :'it is a truism that the conception of the judicial function is inseparably bound up with the idea of a suit ..... the supremacy of law, chap, vi, for a review of other cases, where the findings of fact by the commission were examined by the court. over other federal trade commissions also the courts have exercised jurisdiction in a similar manner: (note 81 at page 1677 of willough by on the constitution of the united states).52. in american ..... the sale has not yet been confirmed.in the meanwhile some time in july 1953 one hira lal applied under section 10 of the displaced;persons (debts adjustment) act, act 70 of 1951, to a tribunal in meerut for the determination of his claim against the sons of salig ram, and the latter on receiving notice under section .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 06 2014 (HC)

Paper Workers and Labour Union Vs. M/S Anco Papers Ltd. and Another

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... opposite counsel. no one appears for respondent no.1 anco.in the reply, psidc states that the petitioner is not a registered trade union under the trade unions act, 1926 and no details of members of the union have been disclosed in the petition nor any resolution authorising sh. sukhwinder singh to file the present petition has mittal manju 2014.05 ..... its inability to discharge its admitted debts to the two secured creditors i.e.psidc and the workers represented by the union. besides, anco deserves to be wound up under section 433 (c) of the act since it has become nonfunctional as its working stands suspended for over one year. therefore, it would be just and ..... are creditors secured in view of section 529-a of the act. the right to wages of the workers represented by the petitioning union stand determined by various orders passed by the labour courts under the provisions of the industrial disputes act, 1947 (for short "id act") ordering or awarding wages/salaries which mittal manju 2014.05. .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 28 2014 (HC)

Khajjan Singh and Others Vs. State of Haryana and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... (16 of 1926), or not, shall commit any unfair labour practice. 25u. penalty for committing unfair labour practices any person who ..... act, 1947 does not contain a provision like section 30 of the mrtu & pulp act in maharashtra. unfair labour practice in the central act are placed in chapter vc. section 25t and 25u deal with prohibition and penalty for committing unfair labour practice. the provisions read : - 25t. prohibition of unfair labour practice no employer or workman or a trade union, whether registered under the trade unions act, 1926 ..... bench of the supreme court dealt with the state law of maharashtra cited as the maharasthra recognition of trade unions and prevention of unfair labour practice act, 1971 (mrtu & pulp act). the court dealt with section 21(1) and its proviso; schedule iv items 2, 5, 6 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 15 1971 (HC)

Shanti Devi and ors. Vs. General Manager, Haryana Roadways, Ambala and ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1972P& H65

..... or not. our statutes are full of instances where appeals or revisions to courts are provided as against the decisions of designated persons and tribunals. see for example, advocates act, trade marks act. reference in this connection may usefully be made to the decisions in 1953 scr 1028 = (air 1953 sc 357 (to which reference has already been made) and ..... the meaning of those words found in section 109 of the code of civil procedure. the court accepted the contention of the solicitor general appearing for the respondent, the union of india, that it was not a judgment, decree or final order, and that being so, no certificate under sections 109 and 110 of the code of ..... judgment it is clear that the above quoted observations were made primarily on the strength of the judgment of their lordships of the supreme court in hanskumar kishan chand v. union of india, air 1958 sc 947, wherein venkatarama aiyar, j., on page 952 of the report, observed thus :-under section 19 (1) (b), the reference is .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 28 1970 (HC)

The State of Punjab Vs. Union of India

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : [1971]80ITR248(P& H)

..... beyond the reach of the state, one would have expected some restriction either in part iii or some other article. thus in the case of taxes on professions, trades, callings and employment's, there is a specific provision under art. 276. it clarifies as well as restricts the power of the state legislature under entry 60, ..... , bombay, and calcutta was intended to be excluded. i therefore, feel that there is force in the preliminary objection raised by the learned counsel for the union of india that the dispute raised in the petition filed by the state of punjab was exclusively triable by the supreme court of india and consequently decline to entertain ..... words. ......'17. the question of liberal interpretation however hardly arises in the present case. it is not the case of the union government that the inclusion of agricultural land amongst the assets by the finance act, 1969, was within the competence of the parliament by virtue of entry 86 of list i. this entry expressly excludes imposition .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 11 1996 (HC)

Kundan Rice and General Mills and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and or ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : [1998]92CompCas895(P& H); (1997)115PLR279

..... government can constitute one or more national industrial tribunals for the adjudication of industrial disputes. under the provisions of section 5 of the monopolies and restrictive trade practices act, 1969, the central government is competent to establish a commission and make appointments thereto. it is also competent to remove members from office. the ..... this contention was negatived. it was, inter aha, observed that (headnote):'the basic justification for the claim for priority made by respondent no. 1 (union of india) in the present case rests on the well-recognised principle that the state is entitled to raise money by taxation, because unless adequate revenue ..... to indicate a sufficient ground for differentiating between the claims of an individual and the claims of the community at large'. similarly, in builders supply corporation v. union of india : [1965]56itr91(sc) , itwas contended that the 'doctrine of the priority of tax dues might have been recognised by judicial decisions in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 25 1966 (HC)

K.R. Erry and anr. Vs. State of Punjab Through Chief Secretary to Govt ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1967P& H279; (1969)ILLJ679P& H

..... in its opinion, require imposition of put on the ground of the service not being thoroughly satisfactory. reliance has also been placed on champaklal chimanlal shah v. the union of india, air 1964 sc 1854, in which rule 5 of the central civil services (temporary service) rules, 1949, giving power to the government to terminate ..... particulars. the petitioner shri k.r. erry joined as an assistant engineer in the p. w. d. irrigation branch in the pre-partition punjab in november, 1926. he continued to work in that department as a permanent assistant engineer and was promoted in due course as an executive engineer. while posted as executive engineer (designs ..... , the objective criterion if any to be adopted, the effect of the decision on the person affected and other indicia afforded by the statute. a duty to act judicially may arise in widely different circumstances which it will be impossible and indeed inadvisable to attempt to define exhaustively: (vide observations of parker, j. in r .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //