Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: trade unions act 1926 chapter i preliminary Page 7 of about 4,907 results (0.479 seconds)

Sangali Dist. Central Co-operative Bank Ltd. Vs. Tukaram Atmaram Jadha ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1997)IIILLJ1247Bom

..... 1986 informing him that he could defend himself or be represented by an employee of the petitioner bank or by an office bearer of the representative union under the act and by none else. the domestic enquiry thereafter proceeded and concluded. the first respondent was found guilty of the charges and removed from service. ..... not apply to the undertaking of the petitioner. thus, there can be no 'recognised union' within the meaning of chapter iii of the said act. consequently, all unions, including the representative union under b.i.r. act, would be unions 'other than recognized unions' as far as the industrial undertaking of the petitioner is concerned. consequently, the first ..... permit the first respondent to be represented in the domestic enquiry by an authorised office-bearer of the general workers union was a contravention of the right under section 22(ii) of the mrtu & pulp act, 1971 and, therefore, the enquiry was bad in law. having arrived at this conclusion, though the industrial .....

Ahmedabad Miscellaneous Industrial Workers' Union Vs. the Electricity ...

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (1970)11GLR628; (1970)IILLJ716Guj

..... challenged, it would be convenient at this stage to refer briefly to a few relevant provisions of the indian trade unions act, 1926 and the bombay industrial relations act, 1946. the indian trade unions act, 1926 provides in a fasculus of sections for registration of trade unions. every application for registration of a trade union, says s. 5, shall be made to the registrar and it shall be accompanied by a copy of ..... cantonment and the village of sabarmati (hereinafter referred to as the local area of ahmedabad) under s. 14 of the bombay industrial relations act, 1946. the first respondent union is also a trade union registered under the provisions of the indian trade union act, 1926. it was registered in the name of the ahmedabad electricity co., ltd., mazdoor sabha on 20th december 1967 under certificate no. g. 560 .....

Shri Sushil Ahuja and Ors. Vs. State Bank of India Officers' Associati ...

Court : Delhi

..... 1. defendant no. 1, which is (as indicated hereinabove) an association of officers of the state bank of india, delhi circle; is a trade union registered under the trade unions act, 1926 (in short the 'trade unions act').3.2 defendant no. 1, it appears, in a meeting convened by its central committee on 29.11.2009, amongst various other issues took ..... connected with the elections was void abinitio. he contended that the reason for the same was that under section 6(hh) of the trade unions act a trade union (defendant no. 1 being one such trade union) is entitled to frame rules, which are required to provide that the term of the members of its executive committee and other ..... been declared, out of which 99 candidates belonging to the defendants group had been elected unopposed. it was also contended that since section 6(hh) of the trade unions act does not provide for consequences of failure to hold elections, within the period of three years, the action of the central committee, if at all, was .....

Fenner (India) Limited. Vs. the Superintendent of Police and ors.

Court : Chennai

..... has the jurisdiction to entertain suit of this nature.2)immunity given to the unions under section 18 of the trade unions act, 1926, does not extend to conduct those acts which may amount to offence.3)peaceful demonstration is a fundamental right of the unions/employees.it would be legitimate for the workers to go on strike, but ..... at the same time, exercising such rights, unions/employees cannot disrupt the functioning of the ..... -hand to the management against the weaker section of the society namely, workmen. dealing with the abovesaid rival contention as to whether section 18 of the trade unions act, would be a bar for granting injunction, when violence was apprehended, this court held that when the workmen of public utility service, go on strike .....

Association of Engineering Workers Vs. Indian Smelting and Refinery Co ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2000(1)ALLMR485; 2000(3)BomCR75; (2000)IILLJ340Bom; 2000(3)MhLj535

..... of 1994) in reference (i.d.a) 328, 437, 462, 854, 828 of 1988. 2. the appellant original writ petitioner is a trade union registered under the trade unions act, 1926. the respondent no. 1 is a company duly registered under the companies act, 1956. the industrial disputes raised by the appellant-union pertain to the reinstatement of about 500 workmen who are the members of the appellant ..... union, who according to the appellant-union were illegally and wrongfully terminated from service of the respondent no. 1 company. the state government by 5 .....

Koyala Udyog Kamgar Sanghatan Through Its Secretary, Mrs. V. Chandra V ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2007(5)ALLMR36; 2007(4)BomCR486; 2007(4)MhLj766

..... there is also prayer to refund the amount if recovered with interest @ 18% per annum in w. p. 2190/2003. petitioner therein is a trade union registered under the provisions of trade unions act, 1926. in both these matters while issuing 'rule', interim relief has been refused. it is admitted position that thereafter respondents have completed recovery of alleged excess ..... accordingly standardisation sub-committee has taken decision and found that recovery ordered by employer was legal and valid. it is further stated that because of persistence of trade unions said standardisation committee met again and as a result of said meeting, date of implementation was taken back to 1/7/1999. it is further stated that ..... of notification dated 5/1/2001 for period up to 31/5/2001. it appears that thereafter some objection was raised to payment of arrears and various trade unions pointed out that notification came to be issued on 14/6/2001 and revised h.r.a. has been made effective from 1/6/2001 and till .....

Mukund Staff and Officers' Association Vs. Mukund Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2007(6)ALLMR312; 2007(6)BomCR75; [2007(115)FLR553]; (2008)IILLJ221Bom; 2008(2)MhLj416

anoop v. mohta, j.1. the petitioner is a trade union registered under the trade unions act, 1926 and has as its members around 800 monthly rated workers employed in the respondent company's factories at kalwe and kurla, mumbai.2. during the period 4-8-2000 to ..... their respective submissions accordingly.14. the supreme court of india in electronics corporation of india ltd. v. electronics corporation of india sendee engineers union : (2006)iiillj773sc while considering the section 10, 2(k) and (s) of the id act reversed the finding of the high court that the onus was on the persons claiming to be workman to prove that they are ..... court that the company should establish that there was no master and servant relationship between the parties and the members of the union were not workmen within the meaning of the expression 'workman' under section 2(s) of the id act was negatived. by further observing the high court came to a peculiar conclusion that since the preliminary issue was raised by .....

Chief Executive Officer, Sangli Urban Co-operative Bank Ltd. Vs. Manag ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (2006)ILLJ799Bom

..... the petitioner is an urban co-operative bank and it had advanced loan to respondent no. 2, a private limited company respondent no. 1 is a trade union registered under the trade unions act, 1926 and it claimed to represent the workmen employed by the respondent no. 2. it was claimed that about 90 workmen were employed by respondent no. 2 ..... and from january 1991, the said factory was closed down. prior to january 1990, there was a lay-off in the said factory. the respondent no. 1 union ..... therefore approached the competent authority and the judge of the labour court by filing an application under section 15(2) of the act. the present petitioner was impleaded as the respondent no. 2 in the said application. though, admittedly, .....

Municipal Corporation of Delhi Vs. Female Workers (Muster Roll) and an ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2000SC1274; 2000(2)ALT34(SC); 84(2000)DLT450(SC); [2000(85)FLR185]; JT2000(3)SC13; (2000)ILLJ846SC; (2000)125PLR371; RLW2000(2)SC329; 2000(2)SCALE269; (2000)3SCC224; [20

..... under:23. cognizance of offences - (1) any aggrieved woman, an office-bearer of a trade union registered under the trade unions act, 1926 of which such woman is a member or a voluntary organisation registered under the societies registration act, 1860 or an inspector, may file a complaint regarding the commission of an offence under this ..... act in any court of competent jurisdiction and no such complaint' shall be filed ..... services were not regularised and, therefore, they were not entitled to any maternity leave. their case was espoused by the delhi municipal workers union (for short, 'the union') and, consequently, the following question was referred by the secretary (labour), delhi administration to the industrial tribunal for adjudication:whether the female .....

Ms. Chitra Srivastava Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2004(76)DRJ558

..... my attention has been drawn to section 25-t of the industrial disputes act, 1947, which is as under:-'no employer or workman or a trade union, whether registered under the trade union act, 1926 or not, shall commit any unfair labour practice.'section 2(ra) of the act defines unfair labour practice as under:-'section 2(ra) 'unfair labour practice ..... ' means any of the practices specified in the fifth schedule.'fifth schedule of the act specifies the various trade practices. s.no ..... of any mala fides. he submits that while it is true that husband of ms. arifa nauman had been working as the general secretary of workers' union, the action of the respondent has not emanated out of any malice or ill will. in fact, he submits that the management rather accommodated the .....